the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.










Wednesday, April 30, 2003

<  Session 1329 (Private/Phone)  >

“Focus Impressions”

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Anjuli (Myranda).

Elias arrives at 8:53 AM. (Arrival time is 15 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good afternoon!

ANJULI: Good afternoon, Elias!

ELIAS: (Laughs) And we continue!

ANJULI: We continue! I had such a fun today with you. I was floating on you in beingness. (Elias laughs) I told Michael that then the other essences of the energy exchange were there too, and they all turned into bubbles. Then the bubbles got all mixed, and this was just so, so delightful.

ELIAS: (Laughs) And creating great fun.

ANJULI: Ja, and Mary and I talked about a dream she had. Mary has said that she dreamt of a little green dog and we talked about her impression that this was a connection with Vicki. I am curious, is the little green dog of Mary’s dream Vicki?

ELIAS: Yes. (Both laugh)

ANJULI: In the past I had an opposite counterpart action with my mother and I talked with you about that. Then this counterpart action was stopped, and now it feels as we have started a new counterpart action, but not opposite.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: So we can have opposite counterpart actions with people and then this stops and after a while we start a new counterpart action which is not opposite anymore?


ANJULI: Elias, I have a list of focuses for you.

ELIAS: HA HA HA! And I am so very surprised! (Both laugh)

ANJULI: I decided not to count the impressions, because I have more impressions than I thought I have focuses, Elias. (Elias laughs) I decided not to count them, and probably my focus number has increased. I had the impression part of that could be because in my list I included the ones which fragmented. Could it be that the number of my past focuses I had felt into were the ones which were not fragmented, or what is happening?

ELIAS: First of all, I shall express to you as I have occasionally previously with other individuals, the numbering of focuses is not an absolute and may change. Therefore, there is the possibility for fluctuation. But also remember that in any designated number of focuses that I may offer to an individual or an individual may offer to themselves through their impressions, generally speaking if the individual is offering themselves the numbering of focuses that they incorporate in this dimension, it is identified in the same manner that I identify them to each of you, and that is a numbering of the focuses that are your focuses, not including those in which the individual may be an observing essence of a focus.

ANJULI: And the fragmentations? Because I view those focuses which fragment after 20 years also as my focuses although they later fragment; but in the time when they are not fragmented, they are my focuses.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Usually when you give focus numbers, are you including the ones... I mean, not the present ones. For example, when my Nepalese focus, which is a current focus, fragmented into the essence Anateal, then this could probably sort of change the focus numbering, although I still also feel her to be my focus. But are you including the focuses which later fragment also in the numbering?


ANJULI: They are not included, that is why I have more?


ANJULI: So that is one reason why I have more, and the other reason... I will see when I count them at the end, but ja, I thought I now feel that my focus number is fluctuating. I will see how many I have at the end. (Laughs)

ELIAS: Which I may express to you, Myranda, is not unusual.

ANJULI: I tried to squeeze a few impressions into one focus. (Both laugh) And in one case this was correct, but in others I un-squeezed them again. So we will see what you say.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Very well.

ANJULI: Then I added a few to my past focuses, BC.

ELIAS: Very well.

ANJULI: The name Tamuri, that is a Huari, is this correct?


ANJULI: Milumet/Sumari, intermediate, thought focused?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: 10,366.


ANJULI: I felt him to be a sort of priest. I connected bird imageries with him, and caves and time-travel and something around invisibility.

ELIAS: This impression is associated with an action of projection that this individual engages quite frequently.

ANJULI: Ah, interesting. The next focus I had felt into is an Aztec focus with the name Metaxa.


ANJULI: Milumet/Tumold, common, emotional?


ANJULI: 7856.

ELIAS: Five.

ANJULI: I think I have dreamt of her many years ago. I viewed her as being a priestess, and she is taking hearts out of the bodies of beings and she is eating them. I was so afraid when I connected with that. But these are just her beliefs. She is a sort of priestess, and this is how it is for her.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

ANJULI: And so that I don’t forget, I so much want to have a focus that gets killed by one of your focuses, Elias. (Elias laughs loudly) I view that to be so intimate. I want to create genuine intimacy so I thought this would be so much fun. I thought if probably my very earliest focus in linear time framework, my Mayan twin Winnya-Ta, who was killed by a tribal man with a dagger into his throat, if that was you.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

ANJULI: Oh nice, Elias! (Elias laughs) Ah, that is just so great!

ELIAS: I have QUITE enjoyed exploring the role of a villain in many focuses. (Both laugh)

ANJULI: But I probably wanted to kill you also. (Elias laughs) Was probably my Aztec priestess Metaxa eating your heart?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Oh, that’s nice! She did not know what she was doing – or did she? I mean, did she know that she was inserting your energy into herself?

ELIAS: Yes, and this is the point of the ritual.

ANJULI: Oh, fascinating, Elias! Oh, Margot will be interested in that.

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! I am quite sure!

ANJULI: Oh, I am so glad, Elias, that we did this nice killing of each other! That is just so great. I am observing essence of Isis. Is this a focus of the essence Lissa?


ANJULI: Is Osiris, the brother of Isis, a focus of Otha?


ANJULI: I still feel to be there. So I considered that I am Horus, son of Isis and Osiris.


ANJULI: Ah! Because I thought I would like to experience the love relationship between brother and sister also as a son. After all, I have many focuses which love to create the experience of incest. (Elias laughs) Great, Elias. He is Milumet/Sumari, soft, emotional?


ANJULI: 4330?

ELIAS: Twenty-nine.

ANJULI: This one year! (Both laugh) If I don’t have to count my number of focuses anymore, I also could include thinking that probably I also have another one in India, that is Kunti. Could that be a focus of me, the mother of the princes Arjuna, Bhima and Yudhisthira?


ANJULI: She is Milumet/Borledim, soft, emotional?


ANJULI: 3031? Or 3030 would be nice also.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Correct.

ANJULI: Nice number! (Elias laughs) Ja, and about Arjuna, I had either Archor as an impression or Arkandin. (Pause) I decide for Arkandin.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

ANJULI: Because I love the name Isidor so much, I thought I have a focus in Greece with the name Isidor who is the brother of your focus Homer. He is first a focus of Lissa and then fragments with Mi into Myranda – probably.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: First he is Ilda/Milumet and then after the fragmentation he is Milumet/Ilda.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Common, emotional, year 990?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: I still have this question about my focuses Thetis and Orestes. You said these are translations. So do they count as our focuses in this dimension or not?

ELIAS: No, not within this dimension.

ANJULI: Are they in another dimension?

ELIAS: Yes, and they...

ANJULI: All of the Iliad focuses?

ELIAS: Yes, and they are not inclusive in the numbering of focuses identified associated with this dimension.

ANJULI: That is why it saves me some focuses. And I thought you are – I forget the name – the son of King Tros, Ilos or something like that. Is that a focus of you?


ANJULI: Aha, I will tell Margot. Then I have another focus, that is Antarah ibn Shaddad al Abbas, an Arabian poet, and I thought be probably later fragments into Eliantan? (Pause)


ANJULI: Milumet/Sumari, common, emotional, 745?

ELIAS: Four, correct.

ANJULI: Mythos, a focus in Greece, who is with Pythagoras – I don’t know if it is Mythos or Mythe – probably he was first male and then female and changed gender, or the other way around. Could that be?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct in that impression, but this is an observing essence role.

ANJULI: I am observing essence of him?


ANJULI: With Pythagoras. Is Mythe/Mythos a focus of the essence Mi?


ANJULI: Is the Indian seer Patanjali a focus of me, or am I observing essence and it’s a focus of Patel?

ELIAS: The latter.

ANJULI: Then we talked about my focus in Judea, the priest Zadok. He is a teacher of Jesus/Telleth, is this correct?


ANJULI: And he was doing out-of-body experiences, not just projections, he is really often doing out-of-body experiences?


ANJULI: That is a religious book chapter focus, the Judea chapter, of course.


ANJULI: Then my focus Miriam that later fragments into the essence Sheen, did she create her baby Jesus/Telleth in the way of how I created my baby, in the way of how we talked about in Sessions 1100 and 1133? Did she create this baby like that, on her own without a father?

ELIAS: Yes, but not of that essence.

ANJULI: Another baby?


ANJULI: And that other baby is later? No, that is earlier than Jesus/Telleth, that baby?

ELIAS: Later.

ANJULI: And Jesus/Telleth was created in the normal way? (Pause)

ELIAS: Yes, although that information would be quite disturbing to many of your religious establishments.

ANJULI: Yes, I know. I will investigate about that baby. That is so interesting, Elias! Now I have got something new. She was talking with an angel and that is my Dream Walker Andria probably?


ANJULI: I will feel more into that story. There is a movie about Jesus/Telleth as a boy, 7 years old or something like that, and I always felt so moved by that. Did he look a little bit like that and his energy was a little bit as in this movie?

ELIAS: Similar.

ANJULI: That is nice! Then her husband Joseph, is this a focus of Joseph, the essence facilitating this energy exchange? (Pause)


ANJULI: And the Apostle John – Johannes – they call him John the Divine, is he a focus of Jiavani?


ANJULI: Is Barrabas a focus of you?

ELIAS: No, but a similar character.

ANJULI: You have a focus with him probably?

ELIAS: Known to that individual, yes.

ANJULI: And Barrabas is not as we think in our religious history but more as written in the book of Waldemar Bonsels/Mi, “Der Grieche Dositos.” This person Barrabas, has he been like that?

ELIAS: More closely associated, yes. Not precisely, but more closely associated.

ANJULI: Ah, so exciting! And is Salome a focus of you, Elias? Hopefully, please. (Laughing)


ANJULI: Oh, nice, nice, oh that’s so great! I also have Dositos on my list of focuses, a Greek man as in the book of Waldemar Bonsels/Mi, he goes to Judea. Is he a focus of Lissa, and then he fragmented into Myranda?

ELIAS: No, this is another observing essence role.

ANJULI: Oh, then he is probably a focus of the essence Mi again?


ANJULI: Aha, I will look for that. This reduces the number a little bit. Then we have another focus probably, with the name Lydia of Illyria, which is now Montenegro. She later came to Rome. Is this correct?


ANJULI: Milumet/Vold, common political, born in the year 3, before Christ.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Do we still have time? I did not look to the watch, Elias.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Continue.

ANJULI: Giovanna Giordano in Italy died in the volcanic eruption in Pompeii.


ANJULI: Milumet/Zuli, common, emotional, born 39 after Christ.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Myrrdin, British Isles, also called Leilokan or Ambrosius, teacher of Merlin, is this a focus of me?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

ANJULI: Lancelot, I thought him to be a focus of me that later fragmented into Jiavani. Could that be?

ELIAS: This once again is an other-dimensional focus.

ANJULI: Aha. Is this my focus?


ANJULI: King Arthur, is he a focus of the essence Archor?

ELIAS: No, a knight.

ANJULI: Archor is a knight there. Is King Arthur a focus of Arkandin?


ANJULI: Also not. Juan Diego, Mexico, Milumet/Milumet, soft, emotional, born 1001. He experiences apparitions. Is this a focus of me?


ANJULI: Pater Andreas, Benedictine monk in the monastery Maria-Laach near Andernach in Germany, is that a focus of me?


ANJULI: Milumet/Tumold, soft, emotional 1105.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Antanno, sorcerer in Scotland, Milumet/Ilda, soft, emotional 1234.

ELIAS: Three.

ANJULI: This is with your sorcerer focus, Brian.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Yes.

ANJULI: Marie de Champagne in England, the granddaughter of Marie de France, is she a focus of me?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

ANJULI: William Carrington, England, in the court of King Edward II, focus of Giselle?

ELIAS: That is also observing essence, throughout the entirety of the focus.

ANJULI: Madeleine de la Mare, France, she could have later fragmented into an essence with the essence name Madeleine. Is she a focus of me?


ANJULI: And then fragments...


ANJULI: ...with Ahmed and Elias into the essence Madeleine.

Angelka Pastrovic, in Sveti Stefan, Montenegro, built this island with her family. Is this a focus of my essence that later fragments?

ELIAS: No, but you are associated with this family.

ANJULI: I have another focus there, and Angelka, she could be a focus of either Giselle or Michael?

ELIAS: Yes, first individual.

ANJULI: Of Giselle, because I view this focus later ... that Michael, Giselle and Myranda fragment the essence Angelique and so Angelka later fragments into Angelique.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Anda Miracle, called MiraclesAnda, my Mohegan focus, Milumet/Ilda, soft emotional, 1439?


ANJULI: Is Catherine of Aragon a focus of my essence?

ELIAS: No, but you are closely associated with that individual.

ANJULI: Is Mira Bai, the queen of Chitore, who later became known as a saint and wrote Bhakti songs for Krishna, a focus of my essence?


ANJULI: Milumet/Sumari, intermediate, emotional?

ELIAS: Intermediate, political.

ANJULI: Political, interesting. Ramani, USA, pueblo native Indian, Apache – is this a correct name and focus of me?


ANJULI: She is both Tumold and Ilda aligned?


ANJULI: Soft, political, 1520.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Then we have Magome Oyuki, wife of Miura Anjin/Allessander, she is a focus of me? (Pause)

ELIAS: Not wife, concubine.

ANJULI: Oh, she was not married with him? I will tell Lynda. (Laughing, and Elias chuckles) But the same name, Magome Oyuki? (Pause)

ELIAS: Slight alteration of name, but is what you term to be close in the sound and the spelling. They are two different individuals.

ANJULI: Oh, okay. And my focus is Milumet/Ilda, intermediate, thought focused.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Miranda in Romania, a Roma, a sister of Carmen/Ioanna, is this correct?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Milumet/Gramada, soft, emotional, 1625?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: They have a focus with you, and the name of your focus is Imran Andrescu?

ELIAS: Correct!

ANJULI: Joanna will like that. (Elias laughs) My focus as the sister of your focus Lazlo Lingstrom in Sweden has the name Asa?


ANJULI: Milumet/Sumari, common, emotional, 1622?

ELIAS: 21.

ANJULI: Kaana, she came from Africa to North America as a slave, Milumet/Ilda, soft, emotional, 1679, a friend of Ashrah’s focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Hah, we got that! (Both laugh) Another focus of Myranda in the USA with the name Joe Newton, a son of a farmer in the south, is he a focus of me?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Does he later fragment or is all of him my focus?

ELIAS: Not fragmented.

ANJULI: Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1753.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Nimalayo, a Cheyenne in the USA, the name means White Hart, like this animal “hart,” Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1760.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: He has a friend, a German with the name Hartmut Herz, and he is called by my focus “Brave Heart,” and that is a focus of you.


ANJULI: Oh, that is so nice. Then Giselle and I would like to know if my focus in the French Revolution, Pierre Louis, and her focus Giselle knew your focus Elias Bodreaux. I am considering that my focus is a brother or cousin of Elias Bodreaux.

ELIAS: Cousin.

ANJULI: Cousin, oh nice, nice, nice. Oh, we are almost done. (Elias laughs) Ivan Ivanovitch Ljudow in Russia, a Cossack, Milumet/Sumari, soft, emotional, 1829.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Anjuli, a princess in India with a Russian mother and an Indian father, Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1835.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Tom Tackleton, USA, Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1839, a slave and priest in the South, African-American with a Native Indian mother.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Anders Runeberg, Iceland and Sweden, Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1842.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: He travels and meets your focus Oscar Wilde.

ELIAS: (Chuckles) Correct.

ANJULI: We have sex also, please, Elias? (Elias laughs loudly) I want to feel into how that is.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

ANJULI: Oh thank you! (Elias laughs) So nice. Miriam Aranyi, in Hungary, Milumet/Tumold, soft, emotional, 1840?

ELIAS: 39.

ANJULI: Your focus there is Count Imre Hunyadi?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Your focus Imre Hunyadi meets shortly my focus Empress Sisi and was supposed to teach her and then she falls in love with him and he was sent back to Hungary.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: That is nice. And my Hungarian focus loved you also. Okay, we let go of the other focuses I have identified as being with Miriam Aranyi. Is Maria Bernarda Soubirous, France, a focus of my essence?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

ANJULI: Is your son Vyvyan Wilde a focus of Myranda who later fragmented with Dunadin into Demian?


ANJULI: When he was my focus he is Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, and he fragments around the disengagement of your focus Oscar Wilde, of his father?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Is his brother Cyril Wilde a focus of Giselle?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

ANJULI: Mary Wood, from Ireland, she died on the Titanic. Milumet/Ilda, common, emotional, 1856.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: I don’t know if Lee Kon-Kim in China is a focus of my essence, the agent in Japan?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

ANJULI: Then we have the Australian focus, Cindy Cunningham, Milumet/Sumari, common, emotional, 1904?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: We are done. (Elias laughs) Except that the name of my current Nepalese focus which fragmented into Anateal is Anu Rana, or the other way around, family name Ranu, first name Anu.

ELIAS: The latter is correct.

ANJULI: Milumet/Sumafi, common, emotional in the time when she is my focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Do I now miss focuses, Elias? I didn’t count.

ELIAS: (Laughs) And I shall allow you to evaluate what you have discovered, which shall be a contribution to your game. (Both laugh) And I offer my congratulations to you in your vast quest!

ANJULI: Well, I managed in this session, Elias, isn’t that great. Do I have a focus in the dimension Merluna with the name Luna-Ling?


ANJULI: Aha, and the other three from Atlantis which I identified, are they all right also?


ANJULI: Ah, that was quick! We are great, Elias. (Elias laughs) It’s so, so interesting to get these focuses. They are so interesting; I have such a fun. It is more fun than a movie. Finally I get my list of focuses, because I was so jealous that my future focus Shelly Shore has a complete Sumafi-ly tidy list and me not. But I am getting the list.

ELIAS: (Laughs) And now you may expand your exploration. As you have identified these focuses, you may also now investigate their stories.

ANJULI: Yes, their stories! I am sure I will discover a few more Elias focuses in there, Elias! (Elias laughs) I plan to do that.

ELIAS: And so you shall.

ANJULI: Yes, and Elias, I really had a belief about past focuses. But some of my past focuses are objectively aware of me. It is just like with the future focuses, I can do the same actions with them.


ANJULI: Oh, I have to ask for Leland if my architect of the Cheops pyramid, Reni, is doing the cutting and lifting of the stones in the way of how we talked in the last session, when you view objective forms, matter, to be made of links of consciousness and so you can do that like that.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Like lifting the table, he is doing it like that, my architect focus of the Cheops pyramid?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANJULI: Leland will continue with his questions in his session. (Both laugh) History is so interesting – I am after all understanding my Shelly Shore. (Elias laughs) Yes, I will report everything to Giselle. She is already waiting for it.

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! Very well!

ANJULI: Howard also. We are exploring many interesting things.

ELIAS: And generating quite a playfulness and fun!

ANJULI: Now this was a session without me looking to the watch. Finally I managed that, Elias.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Very well, I shall be acknowledging you in that accomplishment also. (Both laugh)

ANJULI: Yes, and when we are done with the session, I will continue with this interesting floating on you which I did.

ELIAS: Very well! And I shall participate in your bubbles also.

ANJULI: You are very Inmi-ly these days, Elias.

ELIAS: (Chuckles) I am not more so than I have been, but you are allowing much more of an awareness and an openness to that interaction now.

ANJULI: Ja, I am aware of that. (Both laugh) Now we had another swimming pool ... another midnight meeting, Elias. (Elias laughs) I talked with you subjectively about all of Runi’s feelings in my book about midnight meetings. That was interesting, Elias, that talk. I love you so much, Elias.

ELIAS: And I offer the same to you, dear Myranda.

ANJULI: Thank you.

ELIAS: I shall be anticipating our next meeting, my dear friend, and we shall generate more playfulness.

ANJULI: Yes, we do.

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! I shall be meeting you subsequently in the bubbles.

ANJULI: Ja, in the bubbles. We will do the bubbles again, Elias.

ELIAS: Very well, my dear friend, Myranda. I express my affection and my appreciation to you.

ANJULI: Thank you.

ELIAS: In fondness, my friend, au revoir.

ANJULI: Au revoir, Elias.

Elias departs at 9:43 AM.

< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >

© 2003 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.