Monday, August 25, 2003
“Translating Elias’ Energy into Physical Form”
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Anjuli (Myranda).
Elias arrives at 7:03 AM. (Arrival time is 13 seconds.) ELIAS: Good afternoon!
ANJULI: Good afternoon, Eliance! (Both laugh) I said Eliance to you in the turning point session. I liked that mixture of “allowance” and Elias. (Elias laughs) Has your essence tone been in that moment Eliance?
ELIAS: Not necessarily, but you may present this to yourself in your playfulness.
ANJULI: When I asked you about memory, we said memory is a recall of perceptions. Since I am perceiving everything in the now and I am creating the past in the now with my now-perception, don’t I recall the past perceptions with another perception? I mean, view the recall with another perception, or what is that?
ELIAS: At times; it is dependant upon what you are creating. If you are continuing to create what you view of the past as it was created in that moment, your recall or your memory shall be of the perception that was generated in the past moment. But I may express to you, for the most part as you generate a memory you are viewing that past event through the perception that you express now. This is the reason that the memory of the event is somewhat altered in each recall.
ANJULI: How is it, for example, when we read past sessions and we read them in the now?
ANJULI: It is not a recall. Or it could be a recall if we have read it already, but we read them in the now and then we create them again in the now?
ANJULI: Or is that a recall?
ELIAS: Both. It is both in a manner of speaking, for what you are generating, you may notice that you may engage a past transcription and you may read that transcription several times, and each time that you read that transcription your perception of it shall be slightly different. For although you are partially generating a recall, you are perceiving what you are engaging through your present perception. Therefore, each time you engage the same action, it is slightly altered.
This is also evidenced many times in association with your interactions with other individuals. As you engage an interaction with another individual in recalling a memory of an event that you have shared together, your memory of that event or that experience shall be somewhat different and the other individual’s memory shall be somewhat different, for each of you are generating a recall of the experience or a memory of the experience, but you are generating that through your present perception.
ANJULI: Yes, and in those types of recall it is a recall of generating in the now the same past, or let’s say I would generate a very different past, then I have a very different memory, not even the memory of a certain event.
ELIAS: Correct, and this is how you alter the past in the present, for it is generated through your present perception. For example, you may be creating an experience in this day, and several weeks from now as this day becomes the past, you may recall that experience but your memory of it shall be filtered through your present perception. Therefore, what you recall in memory may be and most likely shall be somewhat different from what the actual event originally was, or the original experience. Now it is changed, for you are recreating it through your present perception in association with memory.
ANJULI: For example, if I remember the day, today, in two weeks and I remember that when I was with my mother we were visited by the neighbor cat, then probably I could remember that I let the cat come into my apartment instead of how it did that today, I did not let her in.
ANJULI: This would then be a new past that I generate with another perception.
ELIAS: Yes, this is correct.
ANJULI: Or I would remember that I did not let the cat in, but I would give the situation a new meaning? It would have another meaning for me than it has now, for example.
ELIAS: Yes, and that alters the past experience.
ANJULI: So even if the action, let’s say, is the same, or the physical aspect of the past that I generate in the now and recall is the same, but what it means for me is different. Then it is still not the same.
ELIAS: Correct. Your association is changed, and therefore the past is changed also, for it is changed in the now.
ANJULI: Yes, and I can also change it even more and create a very different memory, event.
ELIAS: Yes, you are quite correct.
ANJULI: And I can have the two memories. I can have the memory that once had another meaning for me and now it has this meaning. Once it has been like that and now it is like this, or I don’t remember it.
ELIAS: Correct. Yes, you are correct. But even in the incorporation of two or more memories, so to speak, concerning the same action, each memory is somewhat altered, for each continues to be filtered through your present perception.
Now; this is not to say that you cannot generate a recall of an experience precisely in the manner in which it was expressed in the past, but to generate that type of experience, generally speaking, you would engage an entirely different action – not merely a recall in memory through thought, but a memory in projecting yourself to the actual experience and allowing yourself to re-experience it in that moment.
But generally speaking, this is not an action that individuals incorporate; therefore, the natural movement and what is generated, for the most part, is to be incorporating your attention now in the present, projecting your attention to the past and generating the memory and the recall through the filter of the present, therefore altering in some manner what the previous experience was.
ANJULI: Let’s say the transcripts that are now coming are sessions of 18 months ago. I create them coming out on a certain day and then I read them in a certain hour, and in the moment when I read them, I create them.
ANJULI: We send them but I create them in the moment when read them?
ELIAS: Yes, and you do not create them of 18 month ago, you create...
ANJULI: Although it says the session has been 18 months ago, I create it in the now.
ELIAS: Correct. And as you engage that initially, you are not generating a recall or a memory, for it is a new experience that you are generating in the moment.
Now; if you read that transcription again tomorrow, you shall be generating a recall and a memory of what you experienced the day before in reading that transcription, but you shall alter it for your perception shall be expressed in the present, and your memory of what you read the day before shall be changed.
ANJULI: When I read the transcript again, I may also have, because I have changed, a new specific subjective connection with you, and therefore the session, in addition to the words, has a new meaning, because in the now I create the transcript of the session and also the interaction with you.
ANJULI: When I read the session again a month later, then I have another interaction with you about that session, and although it is the same session, but with a new perception I create it differently.
ANJULI: And you again interact with me and I am different, so I get another kind of knowledge from it.
ANJULI: I could even create reading a past session from you with other people, let’s say, and then the session has very different words from how I created it a week ago.
ANJULI: Then so to speak I always create my own sessions?
ELIAS: Yes, and your own interaction with myself.
ANJULI: Probably we translate the energy of the sessions all differently?
ELIAS: Yes, for you translate this through your perception.
ANJULI: And the others get another session. (Laughs)
ANJULI: Interesting – I need to be all of them! Fortunately, I am consciousness, and I can get all the information of how the others perceive the sessions, although focus-me does not remember that. (Both laugh) Ja, but I can get all the various knowledge of all the various essences about your sessions?
ANJULI: You know, when I read the recent transcripts, they were all about no absolutes. After all, they were 18 months ago, but I thought they are so present!
ELIAS: Correct, for they are being created now by each of you.
ANJULI: Can we also create getting a future session now?
ELIAS: If you are so choosing, although as with any manifestation in relation to the design of your physical dimension and your incorporation of linear time and the familiarities of your associations, you may express much more challenge and difficulty in generating that action than you shall with generating a past action, for you view past actions to already be and to be solid; whereas, you view future, within your beliefs and your associations, to not already be and to not be solid.
ANJULI: Yes, and now we are exploring viewing the future and the past to be the same.
ELIAS: Correct, but this is also associated with any expression that you associate as not physically present or not physically manifest. The past, in your associations and your beliefs, is already physically manifest, and therefore you may generate recall and memory of it, and you may generate actual manifestations of it in your present now. But the future is not solid, is not what you term to be or you associate to be physical or manifest. Therefore, you generate much more challenge in creating a thing from what you perceive to be nothing, although this is what you create continuously in each of your days, in every moment, but your association is different.
This is the reason that individuals generate tremendous challenge and difficulty in presenting a physical manifestation to themselves of an individual that has disengaged. It is not that the energy is not present or available, it is that your beliefs are so strongly expressed in association with creating a thing from nothing.
ANJULI: Like me creating you in physical solidity.
ELIAS: Correct, or your mother creating her partner.
But you may each create a memory of some experience in the past, for that is already manifest, in your association, in a different manner than the future. Therefore, it is not as challenging to generate the manifestation physically of some expression which has occurred in how you associate “already in the past,” for that is viewed as already inserted into your physical reality.
ANJULI: So sometimes when I am aware of our energy mix and when I connect with you, then sometimes that’s a more subjective energy experience and sometimes there is an immediate association with a physical body imagery.
ANJULI: I have the feeling that it is not that I connect with your energy subjectively and then I am musing on how I could translate that energy, for that is what I have been doing, too – in the past that I now remember. (Laughs)
ANJULI: But it feels as if it is very suddenly or spontaneously or it is just there, this imagery, as if you are suggesting the imagery, not as if you are reaching through layers of consciousness. Or am I just more natural in translating you, although you are then not solid?
ELIAS: You do allow an openness, which within your physical manifestation it is not necessary for you to reach through layers of consciousness, in your terms, for I project energy through layers of consciousness. Therefore, it is already available and present, and you may merely allow yourself an openness to receive it. In that reception, you may configure it in any manner that you wish.
ANJULI: In the last session, you said I don’t have to think of how you look, that it is like translating any other person into form, because we usually don’t reconfigure the form, how it looks, and that is with your form the same.
ANJULI: But you don’t have a form.
ELIAS: I am understanding, but I have incorporated a form which has been inserted into your past, so to speak. Therefore, you may choose any of those manifestations, any of the configurations of energy of any manifestation that I have incorporated in what you term to be the past, and merely allow that energy, or allow yourself to tap into that energy, and therefore, without reconfiguring the energy, automatically generate the projection of the form in whatever form you have tapped into. I incorporated many, many, many focuses within your physical dimension. Therefore, you have many choices of forms.
ANJULI: You mean it would be the form of one of your focuses, not another one?
ELIAS: Yes. Generally speaking, yes, for this is what is familiar to you, to generate a form in likeness to yourself, which would be a physical focus.
Now; you may, if you are so choosing, generate a different form from some other physical manifestation within another physical dimension, and that would be an accurate translation also. But what is familiar to you is to interact with another being of your species, therefore another human being. In this, you tap into my energy and move your awareness to a physically manifest form of my energy, and thusly allow yourself to configure that energy in the manner in which it was expressed in your physical dimension.
ANJULI: Ja, but this would not be like being visited by one of your physical focuses, as if a past focus is visiting me? I would translate the form?
ELIAS: It is a different action. It is dependent upon what your direction is. You may be tapping into a past focus of myself and viewing that focus and allowing yourself to assimilate information concerning it, but not necessarily generating an actual physical projection of it standing before you.
Whereas, if you are tapping into my energy, not necessarily another focus but my energy, and allowing your awareness to move slightly sideways into a configuration of that energy in association with a physical form, what you shall do, in your terms, is tap into an aspect of my energy that may be translated into a physical form. Therefore, you shall project a physical form that would be associated with some manifestation that I have actually incorporated within your physical dimension. But you shall not be interacting with that focus, merely...
ANJULI: Ja, I am understanding. All the forms that you had in all dimensions, they are your forms, and I can use any of these forms for the energy I connect with, the energy, let’s say, of your Inmi-Elias attention or whatever I am connecting.
ELIAS: Correct, but what you shall be interacting with is my energy now, not the energy of another focus – merely the form of another focus.
ANJULI: This means I could create on one day being visited by a physical form of you and using the imagery of one focus of you, and on another day you look different, for I use the imagery of another focus?
ANJULI: Then you could sometimes have black eyes and sometimes blue ones.
ANJULI: That is what my confusion has been, because I thought I have to have always the same form in my imagery of you.
ELIAS: No, it is not necessary. That is an expression of more rigidness.
Now; I may express to you that many times individuals express more of a comfort in attaching to one form, and may express that that type of an association is easier for them to concentrate upon and offers them a type of focal point. But it is not necessary, for you may tap into the energy of any form and it may change dependent upon what you in the moment are tapping into and what you are allowing yourself to generate in that particular moment.
Also, at times, that may be influenced by what energy you are interacting with in association with myself. In one moment you may be interacting with one aspect of energy of myself, and in another moment you may be interacting with a different aspect of energy with myself, and perhaps you image them to yourself differently in association with the different expressions of energy also.
ANJULI: I, for example, connect with one aspect of you and may give him the form of a focus of you with blue eyes and the other one gets black eyes.
ANJULI: When I translate you with black eyes and black hair, then this form could be connected with, for example, our focus in Hungary or our gypsy focus?
ELIAS: It is possible.
ANJULI: Arkandin van Anderson also has black eyes and black hair, does he look very similar to... Because, Elias, you are sort of getting mixed.
ELIAS: (Laughs) Allow yourself a freedom. Allow yourself to merely flow with whatever energy you may be tapping into in the moment and allow yourself to configure that in any manner that you choose. For you shall automatically be tapping into a form that is the expressed energy of one of my focuses; therefore, it matters not.
ANJULI: What if I take the form of Arkandin because I mix you so much and take one of his focuses to create a form for you? Could this accidentally happen also?
ANJULI: This means I can allow myself to have any impression I have now. I don’t have to think, “Now I need to think of another form,” when the impression is of this form.
ELIAS: Correct, for I have expressed manifestations with a very similar appearance.
ANJULI: (Laughs) Oh, Elias, I have really fun with the both of you! You did not possibly start to merge, Arkandin and you?
ELIAS: That is an action that occurs continuously with essences, and therefore, this is not an unusual expression. I...
ANJULI: Ja, but usually it is then temporarily.
ELIAS: Correct. I incorporate that action with yourself, also.
ANJULI: There could also be mergers that are not temporarily? What is then happening when you are merging with an essence but it is not a temporary merger?
ELIAS: This would be somewhat difficult to explain, for that implies permanence, which also implies an absolute. But in another manner of speaking, I may express to you yes, for there is no separation. Therefore, all essences are continuously merged with all other essences or with each other as consciousness.
But if you are associating with individual essences and an action of individual mergences in that association, no, there would not be an expression of permanence in mergence, for that generates an absolute, of which there are none.
ANJULI: Then I can just forget it and I do it differently. I just don’t have to think of separation of essences anymore because I think I start to have difficulties to think like that! (Elias laughs) Then with you and Arkandin and Veerin, you are so... I said in the last session they are kind of Elias-essences for me. What is that?
ELIAS: Elias-essences? Ha ha! You are merely generating associations of what you have allowed yourself to tap into and to view and to generate an identification of appearances, and allowing yourself to generate certain appearances in association with my energy. That allows you to project a form that is familiar to you and to interact with that in association with my energy.
ANJULI: Oh, isn’t that a nice mixture game! We talked about energy and the turning point and you are connecting with us with a greater volume. You are using a greater volume in sessions.
ANJULI: Or in all our connections?
ANJULI: And therefore we also change. You, for example, said I create more openness to receive a greater capacity.
ANJULI: So what am I doing? I am opening, I am expanding my energy, what am I doing for to create that? What have I been doing for to create that greater capacity?
ELIAS: You are expanding and widening your awareness, and therefore also expressing more of an openness, more of a vulnerability, more of an allowance, which generates a greater capacity to receive. But it also generates a greater capacity to create, for the more you allow yourself to receive, the more you allow yourself to create. It is a natural flow of energy.
ANJULI: Has it also something to do with the energy field? Is that also influencing my connection with you?
ELIAS: In what capacity?
ANJULI: When I balance my energy centers more or expand my energy field or include more energies of my other dimensional focuses as we said in that session, is this having an influence?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, for that generates an openness also, and as you express more of an openness, you generate a greater capacity to receive.
Now; it is not a matter of cause and effect; it is an action of recognition. As you become open more, you expand your awareness and you expand your understanding, and that generates a greater allowance and more of a trust of yourself, and that is what allows you to create more.
ANJULI: And also that I am practicing to be not so singularly focused anymore, so that sometimes I feel many things happen at once. When I connect with you, I have more eyes, so to speak, with which I look at you.
ELIAS: Yes, in a manner of speaking. This also is an expansion of awareness, a greater capacity for allowance.
ANJULI: Then we said that I can color my picture with the blending of our energies, and you said like I use colors.
ANJULI: You are coloring our pictures?
ELIAS: I am offering a contribution. Ha ha ha!
ANJULI: Ja, I like that a lot! Somehow I understand it, that is nice when you don’t have to use the intellect for something. Yes, you color my picture, because I create energy mixes like colors. I do with energy mixes like I do with colors?
ELIAS: Yes, and therefore...
ANJULI: Can I color my picture with other energies also, with Patel and with other energies?
ELIAS: Yes, you may.
ANJULI: Oh, Elias, this is great!
ELIAS: You are not limited to merely one, my friend!
ANJULI: How is that done? I mean...
ELIAS: In the same manner that you allow yourself to tap into my energy and you allow yourself to receive my energy and therefore generate a mergence with my energy. You may generate that action with any other essence or with many essences simultaneously.
ANJULI: And they color my picture because our energies are merged?
ANJULI: Oh, Elias, that is really great! (Elias laughs) I like the imagery of coloring my picture with beliefs or with energies. With energies it is even more interesting, although that is the same. What are the beliefs in there doing? The energies are the colors and the beliefs are with what I paint?
ELIAS: The forms.
ANJULI: Ah, yes. Well, a little question to the turning point. We just talked about that, Michael and I. When we had the heat in Europe, Mary told me you said to someone these weather patterns and the heat in Europe had something to do with the new wave.
ANJULI: Many in France used that as an excuse to disengage, thinking the heat was too much. Ten thousand people were that in France. I said to Mary probably they did not want to participate in the new wave.
ANJULI: Have there been more people now disengaging than usual in other time frameworks?
ELIAS: Not necessarily more individuals disengaging than in other time frameworks, but more individuals disengaging in association with natural phenomenon, and not necessarily in association with mass events that are producing of violent actions.
ANJULI: We can create new kinds of excitement and mass events now? We talked about this also, about these old types of mass events, excitements like the World Trade Center event or something like that. Mary and I talked about this electrical and magnetic thing you mentioned to some people in recent sessions. I would very much like to create excitements with my collective, but not the old type of excitements.
ELIAS: (Laughs) And this is your choice.
ANJULI: My specific choice?
ELIAS: Do you create all of your reality?
ANJULI: I create mass events, yes, so I can create my mass events to be like that?
ANJULI: Whatever, they see a blue light on the sky or something unusual like that, not necessarily the old type of events?
ANJULI: What would be mass events that would be an imagery of the thing you said about the magnetic energy? You said electrical energy is about outward attention, and magnetic energy would be about inward attention. We were thinking about that, Mary and me. Would that be these types of mass events like we all connect with, the types we talked about, would that be a mirror of whatever you said about this magnetic and electrical thing?
ELIAS: Yes, for the electrical energy is an energy that is projected outwardly. Magnetic is an energy of receiving.
ANJULI: So when we create that in the collective, all of us having this energy of receiving, we would create different kinds of mass events.
ANJULI: Like for example, mass events when we had Olympic games and we had the initial celebration and all beings are watching, are these magnetic mass events?
ANJULI: Then I understand that. That is interesting. Do we still have time?
ELIAS: You may incorporate another question.
ANJULI: Do I have 2108 focuses in the next blink of this dimension?
ANJULI: And do you have 3001 in the next blink? (Pause)
ANJULI: It is still the one question, Elias! (Both laugh) Ja, and in the past blink I had 314 focuses?
ANJULI: And did you have in the past blink 873 focuses?
ELIAS: Incorporate another 0 to that number.
ANJULI: 8730? Oh, Elias, I will tell Margot; she will be pleased. Ja, and we still don’t have the focus number of your focuses for THIS blink, Elias.
ELIAS: Ha ha! But I continue to play the game of hide and seek with you.
ANJULI: I am even ready to think you have 6000 or more in this blink.
ELIAS: (Laughs) Continue seeking!
ANJULI: Okay, we will. Well, Elias, I have many questions about the next blink. Can we do this then off-line, my questions about the next blink?
ELIAS: Very well!
ANJULI: Oh, Elias! When I put the attention on the letter of my mother, are you receiving that? She has written some greetings to you.
ELIAS: You may express my affection and my greetings to her also.
ANJULI: Ja, she gave me a little note with some love, expressing if you could greet her husband and say that she loves him.
ELIAS: I already have, and I shall continue to be projecting energy to her in loving supportiveness.
ANJULI: Thank you very much.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
ANJULI: Okay, Elias. This was an interesting session. I will think about the translating of you into form.
ELIAS: Very well, and I shall anticipate...
ANJULI: I will translate you and then we talk about the next blink and all other kind of stuff.
ELIAS: Very well, and I shall be anticipating our next objective meeting. Ha ha! As always to you, Myranda, in tremendous affection and great lovingness, my friend...
ANJULI: From me, too.
ELIAS: ...in dearness, au revoir.
ANJULI: Au revoir, Elias.
Elias departs at 7:59 AM.
© 2003 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.