the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.










Thursday, August 05, 2004

<  Session 1602 (Private/Phone)  >

ďEvidence of ShiftingĒ

Participants: Mary (Michael) and KC (Nanaiis).

(Eliasí arrival time is 9 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good afternoon!

KC: Good afternoon, Elias. How are you?

ELIAS: As always, and yourself?

KC: As always, thank you very much. Iíve been talking to Mary and talking to Mary and talking to Mary some more. Iíve had a couple of sessions that Mary and I have cancelled, and it worked out great because this is my favorite day to have a session and this is my favorite time to have a session! Actually, Iíd like to start out with some questions for other people.

ELIAS: Very well.

KC: My good friend, Katherine, who lives in California, she would like to know her essence name, her families, orientation and focus.

ELIAS: Very well. Essence name, Claire. And your impression as to essence families?

KC: I think she is belonging to Sumari, aligned Zuli.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Oh, my goodness! I think she is oriented common...

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: ...and that sheís emotionally focused.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: I suspect sheís a final focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Oh! Oh, thatís very, very interesting!

She and I, and a lot of other people I know, have been having imagery of frustrations, worrying about the right choices, cause and effect beliefs. She has some specific questions about having a stiff neck, whether she should continue pursuing certain casting directors, and sheís been performing auditions and not getting jobs. Then just yesterday or the day before, she noticed a settling of her energy, and I noticed the same thing. So, my question for her is could you just give her words of wisdom, just something that she might need to hear right now?

ELIAS: In what capacity?

KC: Well, in terms of dealing with the frustrations she has. She is a very energetic, exciting person. She has a lot of energy, she has a lot of drive. She loves being where the action is. She loves California, and she seems to fit in there really well. She would like to be a working actor, which she is, but she would like to work a lot more. Thatís where her frustrations come in. Her questions to me originally were is she just wasting her life away in California and should she come back home to Cincinnati?

ELIAS: No. I may express to you that it is not a matter of wasting time; it is a matter of paying attention more efficiently and trusting herself in her ability.

Now; I am aware that in offering that response to the individual, it is quite likely that the response that the individual shall express is that she does trust her ability. I may express to you that you may offer my suggestion that she re-examines that, for in some capacity she does trust her ability to be generating her craft, but she also compares. And in comparing, that is an expression of doubt and not trusting her own ability. In this, that motivates her to push her energy and to be striving rather than to be allowing a natural flow of her own creativity and allowing herself to express freely.

KC: That makes perfect sense to me. You have said that we know other people better than we know ourselves, and in looking at her and in my impressions of her families, Sumari/Zuli, I see I have always felt that she definitely holds the ability to do and to accomplish what she really wants, so I have no doubts, but apparently she does.

ELIAS: For she generates this action of comparing and thusly pushes her energy, rather than allowing a natural flow of creativity and trusting her own expression.

KC: I think sheíll understand that. I shall give her that message.

ELIAS: Very well!

KC: Is there something else for her that you wanted to say?


KC: I have a question about Fran/Sandel. She didnít ask me to ask this, but Iím wondering if sheís fragmented of Tomkin. She mentioned it as a possibility.

ELIAS: That would be one.

KC: Tomkin is one! We think that Tomkin has physical focuses now. Is that correct? Yes, that must be.


KC: She knows a man named Jim, and she thinks that might be a focus of Tomkin. Is it?

ELIAS: Observing.

KC: I have a praying mantis that lives on my deck in a hibiscus. The hibiscus happens to be a reddish color and a golden yellow color, which are very close to Fran/Sandelís colors. I imagine that there is Sandel energy, or at least imagery for me, in that praying mantis. Now, I donít think that I really need validation of that, because I think I can choose to have that praying mantis symbolize Sandelís energy for me. Is that correct?

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: So this, of course, brought a smile to my face all the time. I would go outside and there he would be. He would raise a little hand up to me, almost like he knows Iím there and heís not afraid.

Meanwhile, Iíve been very in nonverbal mode. I really miss my verbal connection with people, but I think that I have been moving inward, inside, very quickly. Iíve felt a lot of movement inside myself. I think one of the reasons, one of my purposes in providing myself with the symbology of Sandel is just to feel close to somebody that I like while Iím being nonverbal and not really interacting with them verbally. Thatís my one layer of that interpretation, and I know thatís correct, but is there another thing thatís going on, because everybody is nonverbal right now? (Elias chuckles) They are!

But my computer is zooming, my computer speed is really, really fast, and yet I was doing nothing. This has changed now, but outwardly it appeared that I was doing nothing. I even got to the point where I wondered what other people were thinking, like my husband. I knew inwardly something was going on. Monday, which was August the second, I felt something that I first interpreted to be a lifting of an energy surge, and then I thought no. Somebody posted about a lightness in their energy, and I thought thatís what this feels like. It feels like a lightness in my energy. Then I thought that what I feel is that I have engaged another layer of energy in this shift. You said that there was going to be an increase of energy last year at the turning point...

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: ...and I think we are finally accustomizing ourselves to that increase. Is that what that was on Monday?

ELIAS: Partially, yes, you are correct.

KC: And what else was it?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, it is an allowance of yourself to participate with energy but not necessarily incorporate a push within yourself to be configuring it in any particular manner, therefore generating not merely more of an acclimation to the intensity of energy, but also allowing yourself to incorporate some balance in which you do not express, in your terms, a type of need to be doing with this energy.

Which is significant, for as I have been expressing recently, in this time framework, as the energy is being intensified tremendously, it is quite easy to be generating extremes, receiving energy and creating extremes with the energy that you receive. Therefore, in experiencing being comfortable with an intensity of energy but not necessarily reconfiguring it and merely allowing yourself to accept it, you generate more of an ease.

Now; also, it is not necessary to be physically communicating or interacting with other individuals to be offering each other supportiveness in energy. Each of you shall create your own type of imagery that validates the otherís generating that supportiveness, as you are with Sandel.

KC: Yes, and there are other energy exchanges I feel that Iím having on the energy highway that do not incorporate a physical manifestation of imagery. I know that Iím in touch with all the people, all the essences that I know that I have met through the forum, and even other essences, some old friends and new friends, and I feel actually much closer to these people than when I am being extraordinarily verbal. I just feel very close to a lot of people right now in energy.

ELIAS: I am understanding. This is also an element of shifting, recognizing energy much more clearly and realizing how to be projecting and receiving energy and the efficiency of it, the clarity of it and the reality of it.

KC: I have to ask you this question, because my sister, Mary Jo/Eazon, and I decided a couple of days ago to offer energy to her partner, Mike/Ealon, and weíve changed a little bit how we send energy. We used to send energy to people and a lot of times it had a specific purpose, and we have changed that now to simply offering energy. We offer energy and I imagine it like hovering in the air until the person chooses to accept it or not. So we offered Mike energy two days ago, and we did it again last night. We see definite evidence that he accepted our energy, and I just have to see if that is correct.


KC: Oh, my gosh! The evidence was just so obvious. Oh, sheíll be so happy to hear that, because weíve been practicing. Weíve been really practicing noticing, especially. Noticing, noticing, and staying in the now, and what we have noticed by staying in the now is that weíre beginning to accept the signals, which was a big snare in the past. You judge the signal, and you get caught up in judging the signal. Now weíve been accepting the signals a little better, getting the messages in the moment, and understanding ourselves better.

ELIAS: Ha ha! And this is your evidence of shifting.

KC: Oh, this is really comfortable! This is nice, because itís intense in the manner of knowing is intense. Itís not intense that youíre all excited and your adrenaline is flowing; itís a contentment. Itís an intense contentment. ELIAS: Yes.

KC: Thatís how it feels. Oh, my goodness. Well, I have to go back to Tomkin for a minute. A couple of years ago, actually it was about six years ago, I had some workmen here, they were a father and son, and their names were Tom Pitts Sr. and Tom Pitts Jr. They were black men, and they had Elias-blue eyes, quite a brilliant blue. Iíve never seen, in fact, eyes that color before. Of course, I had to ask Tom Pitts Jr. where he got his eyes, and heís a very smart-alecky; he said he got them from his father. So I figured that Tom Pitts Jr. might be Alianton, and Tom Pitts Sr., I would love it if he would be Tomkin. But I donít know; Iíd just sort of want that to be. Is that correct or not?

ELIAS: (Laughs) I am aware of what you are expressing, and I may express to you that this would be an example of the difference between an actual impression and what you wish!

KC: Well, Iím beginning to be able to tell the difference. But I can still keep the blue eyes as imagery of you!

ELIAS: This would be your imagery associated with myself. But as to the focuses of these two essences, no, that would be a wish. Ha ha ha!

KC: I have a few questions for a new acquaintance, Liana. Letís do her statistics first, her essence name, family, orientation and focus, and we do have some impressions. I wonder right away if her essence name has a ďKĒ in it.

ELIAS: Yes. And?

KC: And are you going to tell me what it is? (Both laugh) Itís not Dakota, is it?


KC: Okay, what is it?

ELIAS: Pliskell, P-L-I-S-K-E-L-L (pliss KEL).

KC: Her families, she believes, are Sumari/Milumet.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Oh, good. And she thinks she is soft, emotional, and a final focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Oh, wow! She thinks her signature color is pink and her focus color is lavender. Thatís not what she thinks Ė she only told me pink and lavender.

ELIAS: Focus color correct, lavender; signature color, a type of pink Ė mauve.

KC: Are we sisters in Italy, she and I? Do we have a focus like that?


KC: Is it current?


KC: Her son, Nathan, she believes is Sumari/Sumafi.

ELIAS: Reverse.

KC: And that he is soft, emotional, and a final focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: And what is his essence name?

ELIAS: Orrion, O-R-R-I-O-N (OR ee on).

KC: Oh, I love that. Her friend, Steve, she believes he is Sumafi/Sumari...

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: ...and that he is soft, emotional, and a final focus.

ELIAS: Not soft.

KC: Shall we allow her to explore further impressions about that?

ELIAS: Very well!

KC: And what is his essence name?

ELIAS: Shyne, S-H-Y-N-E (SHEEN).

KC: I have a couple of questions for Carter. His left ear whistle, is that Ordin?


KC: And his energy surge that he feels going up through his body and out through the top of his head accompanied by a sound, is that him releasing energy buildup?


KC: He felt like a bolt or a jolt, actually it would be like an electrical bolt of energy, and he thinks thatís your energy. Is that correct?


KC: His smoke alarm/mirror imagery, I forget the story, and itís so hysterical. He wakes up in the middle of the night, and the smoke alarmís going off. So he gets up out of the bed, and he bumps into the mirror. The mirror falls over, he grabs the mirror, and I guess he stood it back up or laid it somewhere, and the smoke alarm went off. His impression, of course, is that this is obviously a smoke alarm/mirror imagery kind of thing. Something must have been happening in his life to get him to want to pay attention to some kind of alarm, and thatís what he thought.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: The portal tile that Cynthia created, that Carter created, the magenta orb in the blue background with the white mesh that appeared and disappeared in the background, and I wanted to ask you if the magenta orb signifies the magenta energy center.


KC: We developed that tile in conjunction with our little 11:11 action, and I think that Carter just saw it one day when he was desiring to visit the 11:11 dimension. But that portal tile, we can use that to access almost anything we want, canít we?


KC: Now, there were a couple of experiences that I had. One was with Awan, Dawn/Awan, when we were doing an impression about the Mayans. She impressioned that she was a Mayan priest and she was sacrificing an infant. When I read that, I imagined that I was Awan, the priest with a knife, and I was also the infant being sacrificed at the same time. As an aside, this was a very satisfying no-separation kind of impression, and I have two questions. Was that an experience of no separation, and am I that infant?


KC: Yes, yes, yes! Just a few days ago Ė you know Gillian/Ari is making major movements in her life Ė she was writing about moving to Bath and people coming to look at her place in London. I instantly felt like I was Gillian and that people were coming to see my apartment. I was so excited, that I already imagined my cottage in Bath and how I was going to decorate it. So my question is, that was also an exploration of no separation, but do I have now a current focus that lives in Bath?

ELIAS: No, but your experience and your assessment of the experience is valid and correct, exercising your empathic sense in more of a fullness and actually merging with the other individual and generating that lack of separation.

KC: The other thing that Iíve noticed every time I have experienced a genuine feeling of no separation with... Iím trying to think if Iíve done that with any of my own focuses Ė only the probable self, I guess, my Kahana probability in Polynesia. Oh, I know the other one, the Mayan boy that murdered somebody in the past. The Mayan boy, I was him and he was me at the same time. I was him and I was me at the same time. This was a feeling of oneness, and I never lost my sense of identity.

My question is in relation to what you said about wonít we be bored after the Shift when weíll be able to create everything we want or during the shifting process. You said, ďHo ho ho! No, I think youíll be having a bit of a challenge holding to your own identity.Ē So, Iíve been kind of exploring my own identity, my own energy, who I am in relation to these experiences, and I havenít had a problem holding to my own identity. Therefore, my question is I should be able to choose to experience the Shift, insert the Shift, and hold to my own identity easily, yes or no?


KC: These experiences have been very, very reassuring to me, to experience my own individuality and no separation at the same time. Itís been such fun, which it is, and itís just been very reassuring. Because this shift can be darned scary at times. (Elias laughs) It is! It is scary, which is why weíve set up this whole no-trauma project. This is our no-trauma project, talking with you.

ELIAS: Correct. Correct.

KC: Oh, Iíve got to ask you this question. Itís a little bit of a silly question, but we have actually created, I guess, additional focuses. Myranda and I chose to have a focus in northern Italy with Archor and Patel. Myranda thinks that Jiavani is probably another essence in their family, is that correct?


KC: Now, I got the distinct idea that we are living in the 7700s AD, in the future. I was reading on the Internet about northern Italy and the Alps and skiing over to Switzerland, and I had this very funny feeling that I translated as a sense that this entire family, our occupation is as a type of rum-runners. Thatís just a distorted translation, but is that correct?

ELIAS: (Laughs) It is a translation, but in association with what you know now it would be comparable.

KC: Oh, my gosh! That just tells me thatís a very fun focus. Oh, dear. (Elias laughs) Now, also, I do check out these little things. In that focus, I, as the mother and the father because we did these sex changes, I am the mother of Myranda but I am the father of Patel and Jiavani. I made Myranda, as my little girl, a violet outfit to wear to play in the snow. Now, is that accurate?


KC: I always enjoy my imagination, but Iím really enjoying it now!

ELIAS: (Laughs) And I am greatly encouraging of you in this expression!

KC: Thank you very much for your encouragement. It works!

My nephew Brian asked you why he sees a yellow aura around all objects. I would never have thought of that question, but why do I see white auras around all objects? Sometimes it turns to blue, but thatís my translation of your energy. But why white?

ELIAS: That would be, actually, more common. I may express to you that most individuals would allow themselves to perceive a white energy field surrounding objects, and as I have expressed to the other individual, generally speaking a pink energy field surrounding what you deem to be living.

White is a natural viewing of an energy field. You may incorporate other colors in association with objects, but that would require a stronger concentration in association with the object, genuinely viewing fluctuations in the energy field which would generate different colors. But with objects, generally speaking, most individuals would view a white energy field.

KC: The other thing related to that is when I first looked in the mirror to see my own energy field, I saw that the entire thing, including the front of me, was pink. It was a pink color that I kind of define as my signature terra cotta color. Itís an off-pink, and it varies in shades from a darker terra cotta to a paler terra cotta. Now, was I seeing my signature color then?

ELIAS: Partially, but also, as I have expressed, this would be, generally speaking, the initial color that you would automatically view in association with any expression that you deem to be living, including yourself.

KC: That explains that. I just have some physical imagery to run by you. Iím still creating headaches in the morning, which I am choosing to do. After we spoke about that being my imagery of energy infusion from my essence or new brain pathways, I decided not to get the headaches anymore. I didnít get the headaches any more and I missed them, because I like the physical imagery. It makes me feel connected. I like the communication of the physical imagery. I just wanted to tell you that because Iím kind of proud of choosing something that I would not normally have thought I would choose, and Iím actually enjoying the headaches.

I wanted to bring up some pill beliefs, because I take various pills for these headaches. Iíve been thinking about that and kind of puzzled by that and wanting to understand it. My husband, David/Flynn... One aside question, is his intent, is at least part of his intent to explore being on an even keel?


KC: We were out to breakfast one day, and I was getting a headache, and I said, ďOh, Iím getting a headache,Ē and took my pills. He said, ďHow fast will they work?Ē and I said, ďIn about an hour.Ē He said, ďIíll ask you again in about an hour if you have a headache,Ē and I said, ďOh no, donít do that! Because pills are attention-moving devices, and in an hour I will have moved my attention. If you ask me if I have a headache, Iíll move my attention back to the headache.Ē And I was astonished with what had come out of my mouth! Because I realized that I use pills and I use various other physical objects and manifestations and activities to move my attention.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Quite a revelation, is it not?

KC: Itís a revelation! You said beliefs are not our enemies, and so Iíve been having that in the back of my mind, beliefs are not my enemies. I can use anything I want to move my attention.

ELIAS: Correct!

KC: I love this idea!

ELIAS: (Laughs) And I may express to you also a reiteration that one method is not better than another method. They are all methods, and you incorporate methods continuously. That generates a comfort, and it also many times creates an ease for your accomplishments.

KC: Yes, and I have been noticing how different people make different choices based on the same beliefs. We hold the same beliefs, and one person will make a choice that might be different or even opposite of my choice, and they both accomplish because we both believe in our own methods and trust our own methods.

ELIAS: Correct. This also offers you examples of different influences of the same belief, and how the incorporation of different influences may generate different outcomes or the same outcomes, dependent upon how the individual associates with the different influences.

KC: I finally had a stronger, more satisfying understanding that the outside imagery is abstract, because I posted a little bit on the Elias List Monday or Tuesday about this change in energy that I felt on Monday. I donít remember if I posted some of the physical imagery or not, but a few people wrote back and they posted their physical imagery. The physical imagery was totally different for every person. One person imaged a full moon; someone else bought a new toilet; someone else is house hunting. I might be simply cleaning the floor, and yet all of these, when we paid attention to our imagery, we gave ourselves the message that the energy was different. We all gave ourselves, relatively speaking, the same message that the energy was different, but all the outside imagery was our own personal imagery, different.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: And that is the abstractness of the physical imagery, right?

ELIAS: Correct, and each of you yourselves may generate many different physical expressions of imagery in association with one expression of energy.

KC: Letís move along, because I want to get to my meaty question at the end that Iím saving for last. Does the tone, does the word ďDakotaĒ fit to my essence? Could it be an alternate essence name for me?


KC: And how many focuses do I have now? I have three numbers: 2019, 2020 and 3001.

ELIAS: The first.

KC: I have to ask you this, because while I was just sitting down to call Mary, my phone rang. I have caller ID, so I looked to see who it was and it said ďtoll free.Ē I picked it up, I answered it, and no one was there. Of course, first of all, this is phone-ringing imagery, itís toll free, and thatís something I would define as positive. Nobody was there, meaning I was there, I was the only one there.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: So, I donít know what that is. What was that? That happened a lot in the last three or four days.

ELIAS: And that is your imagery to be paying attention to you and to your energy.

KC: I figured that was a pay attention to me thing, because I had forgotten about paying attention to what energy Iím projecting.

I have to also tell you my little expressway situation. I tried the sailboats; I tried the hot air balloons. I didnít accomplish much. I think I moved the expressway; I also think I moved the train tracks and the airport. Theyíre all closer. I decided to make the expressway energy into lights and colors because theyíre already sound, theyíre already a vibration. I thought with a small switch in vibration imagery, I could create lights out of sound and I could create colors out of sound. I had a lot more luck with that. The other thing Iíve noticed is I think the expressway is becoming a matter of non-issue for the simple reason that I feel the same way about it that I did about the tree. Maybe Iím just getting bored with the project.

ELIAS: Or perhaps allowing yourself to relax and therefore also relax your concentration.

KC: That must be it. Because you know what I started to do, I started to think about the imagery of the expressway being the energy highway, and isnít it nice that I have imagery of the energy highway so close, so easy to get on, so fast to arrive at the destination? I just started thinking about it differently. Would I really want to move the expressway if I trusted my ability to move the expressway, and would I? I donít think so. So, thatís actually a change in perception.

ELIAS: Correct, allowing yourself not to be fighting with your own expressions, and allowance, allowing yourself to not be struggling with different expressions, continuing to concentrate upon the judgment of it and continuing to attempt to eliminate. But as you relax and you begin to express the perception that it matters not and you generate some element of appreciation, your perception alters and this imagery is no longer offensive. It no longer incorporates the strength that it did previously.

KC: Yes, that is exactly what happened. So that is definitely movement.


KC: You know my coffee pot imagery and trying not to spill the first cup because my belief is the pot has been designed incorrectly? Iím still playing with that, because itís kind of fun. I got up one day and I just whacked my knee on the table. Ouch! I was grumpy and out of sorts and in a terrible mood, and I had no patience with the coffee pot. I thought to myself, well, I guess I canít choose this morning anyway, because Iím in such a bad mood. Then I thought wait a minute! Who said I canít choose when Iím in a bad mood? Iím going to stay in this bad mood and Iím going to choose not to spill the coffee anyway, and it didnít spill.

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! Which offers you...

KC: Because I had this belief that you have to be in a certain frame of mind in order to create what you want.

ELIAS: Which is not true! (Chuckles)

KC: That is not true. I was astounded, because I thought you had to do all this inner stuff and get yourself into a calm place and align your energy centers and all these requirements Ė the requirement belief.

ELIAS: These are strongly expressed truths, but they are not true.

KC: Well, I have a very interesting situation going on with windows. Iím not going to ask you about it today, because in Session 1088, Frank/Ulraís session, he was talking about dealing with other individuals and creating what he wants instead of waiting for the other person to create what he wants. Thatís the type of situation that I have going on, and youíve already explained it perfectly in Ulraís session. But there is a window situation thatís similar to his, and I may report on my success at a later date.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Very well! And I shall be anticipating your report.

KC: I have one other imagery that I would like to ask you about, and I think itís connected with the expressway. My computer has no sound. Now, I know some influencing beliefs are the computer is old, the computer is second hand, I use the computer a lot, and I donít like sound, anyway. That was what I thought I believed. So now my computer is silent to show me how much I really do like sound. I think thatís the only reason itís quiet right now.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Because I get on there and thereís no sounds, and Iím, ďIíve had it with this no sound business! Give me noise.Ē

One other thing about thoughts before we get into more of the truth wave and truth in my understanding of it, I have a big piece of coral, not fragile, but it will break. I had it sitting in the kitchen, and it was clean, and it was dark, and it was sitting on the edge of the buffet. I was getting ready to go to bed, and I looked at the coral, and my thought appeared ďthe wicked husband is going to knock it over and break it.Ē So I said, ďNo, no, your thoughts donít create your reality. I can leave it there, and he wonít break it.Ē Then I thought no, your thoughts are translating the belief youíre aligning with. I know how to fix this; Iím going to take that coral and Iím going to put it in the living room where it belongs, and then I know Dave wonít knock into it and break it. Now, is that how we are supposed to be using our thoughts? One way?

ELIAS: One manner. Let me express to you, as you are aware, thought is a mechanism of translation. Therefore it does not merely translate your beliefs, it also translates impressions. It also translates communications.

KC: Oh. Energy?

ELIAS: Yes. Therefore, in this situation, you incorporate two actions being translated through thought: one associated with the belief that your partner does not pay attention, and therefore is oblivious and incorporates the potential to be breaking an object that is significant to you. But also, you were translating an impression, an impression concerning a potential probability, and therefore you chose to generate a different probability. You objectively chose to insert a different probability into your reality by listening to that impression and moving the object.

KC: I understand. That feels right. That makes sense to me. Okay, then let me bring up one more thing. I bought a cheap little garden hose, I hooked it up to the faucet outside, and I water the plants on the deck with it. Itís not very strong. These are my beliefs. So one day I had the water turned on but I had the hose nozzle at the end of the hose turned off, so the water pressure was inside the hose. I came in the house, because I didnít want to go downstairs and turn the water off, and I sat down in the kitchen to have a cigarette. I thought I should turn that water off, because that hose canít contain that pressure, and about two minutes later the hose exploded and water shot everywhere. I had to laugh, because I thought, well, itís not like I didnít know. I not only used my beliefs to create it, but I also was interpreting an impression.

ELIAS: Correct.

KC: Yes, and also I did not change the probabilities. I allowed that interrupter, which was to me imagery of a sense of containing energy in myself and that energy shall be expressed. I almost feel that when the hose exploded and I laughed, that released some of my energy, and I felt better.

ELIAS: Correct, but also it is an expression of validation to you concerning your impressions, which in your terms, from time to time individuals generate that type of action. You express an impression, you understand the impression, you translate it, you are aware of it, and you choose not to act in association with it and therefore validate that it was a valid impression.

KC: Ah ha. I understand.

ELIAS: Therefore, you reinforce your trust of your ability to generate impressions accurately.

KC: Then the thought crossed my mind in musing about that situation that if you stay in the now and pay attention to yourself, you can make choices that you would enjoy more than if you just sort of didnít pay attention and sort of made familiar choices.

ELIAS: Correct, but in these two examples, you may view that you chose to act in conjunction with your impression in association with the coral, for it is of value to you. You chose not to follow your impression in association with the hose, for it is not of value to you. Therefore, it is expendable, and you may incorporate that expression to validate your impression rather than incorporating the breaking of an object that you value to validate your impression.

But I may express to you, the reason that individuals at times choose not to be generating an action in association with an impression is to validate the validity of their impressions and the accuracy of their impressions. For many times if you are following and acting in conjunction with an impression, generally speaking, you do not objectively view what you may have avoided.

KC: This fits right into my question about intrusiveness. In the Darlings session number two that Fran had, you said, and this will be paraphrased, are you generating a movement in the direction of openness and less separation or in more of a closed environment, which promotes less acceptance. Itís tricky to evaluate, for beliefs are strong and truths are very strong.

Now, a little background. The Darling group is a little group of people who started a little Elias list in order to communicate with each other. My concept of that was that there were many, many, many Darlings, but I prefer small groups. I thought 33 was a really nice number, but then we went up to sixty, seventy people. I do hold the belief, I do hold judgments about sizes of groups, numbers in the group, exclusivity, who I am willing to be very, very open with, and what I will say in certain groups versus what I will say in other groups.

This little group had what we like to call the Darlingsí War, in which the group was basically disbanded. My feeling, my signal, was one of hard feelings and intrusiveness that I did not reconfigure, and I think it has a lot to do with... Well, you said it in the Vermont session that the way you could reconfigure that is to know ahead of time, so to speak, that energy with the intention of intrusiveness is directed out and that you can then reconfigure that, or you can choose to accept it and explore it. I did not reconfigure that energy, and I think that in retrospect now, I really was not staying in the now and paying attention to the energy I was projecting, in terms of something else that you said in a different session, Session 1091, to pay attention to my natural expression of preference in association with the expression of other individualsí energy. Now, have I put that together pretty well myself?


KC: So, if I pay attention, as in the examples with the hose and with the coral, if I pay attention to my energy in the now, then it is quite possible for me to know what energy is being projected that I might find intrusive, that I might then reconfigure?


KC: Because I am very interested in practicing reconfiguring energy and discussing that some more with you, and maybe offering some examples between now and the next time we talk.

ELIAS: Very well.

KC: Weíre finished for the day, but Iím going to see you in person in October! (Elias laughs) I set up sessions for the whole year. One of my reasons is because itís so easy not to have a session when youíre not having a session. I decided that I wanted a session every four months at least, so I just went ahead and set them up, and I really feel good about that. Plus I have a little tiny project of making the unfamiliar more familiar, and talking to you on the phone is still a bit unfamiliar. So thatís my little project, my little shift project.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Very well! I shall be anticipating our next meeting.

KC: Me, too.

ELIAS: And I shall be encouraging to you in all of your projects.

KC: Oh, thanks, Elias.

ELIAS: As always, my dear friend, I express my tremendous affection to you in great friendship, and offer to you my lovingness.

KC: I love you, too, Elias.

ELIAS: In fondness, my friend, au revoir.

KC: Au revoir.

Elias departs after 1 hour, 1 minute.

< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >

© 2004 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.