Sunday, March 21, 1999
“Do Not Be Cosmitizing Your Abilities!”
Participants: Mary (Michael), Dale (Jene), and a new participant, Mary (Karla).
Elias arrives at 11:22 AM. (Arrival time is 23 seconds.)
ELIAS: Good morning! (Grinning)
MARY: Good morning!
DALE: Good morning!
ELIAS: Welcome to new essence this day!
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: And you have questions this day? (Grinning)
MARY: Yes, we do. First of all, thank you for being here.
ELIAS: As you have asked, I have responded. (Smiling)
MARY: Thank you. I guess initially I was wondering if you could comment on these overwhelming feelings of fatigue that I have so often in this focus, but especially lately, and it seems to be affecting all aspects of my life lately. (Pause)
ELIAS: Partially, the reason that you have experienced this type of fatigue within this particular focus is that you are designated as final focus. Many times individuals within this type of manifestation experience physically a fatigue or restlessness, impatience many times, and also sporadic lack of motivation.
In this, subjectively you recognize that you are designated as the final focus, and you hold an anticipation of moving into areas of non-physical consciousness and disengaging from areas of physical focusing. This is translated objectively – as influenced through belief systems – in the manner that suggests that there may be a more exciting adventure to be encountering once you are disengaging and that you hold an element of boredom within this particular dimension, for it has been engaged previously and is being engaged, as all of the focuses are simultaneous.
But coupling with the belief systems that are associated with this particular dimension ... it being the universe and the planet for learning and aspiring, and that if you are focusing within this particular dimension, you are occupying a lower plane, so to speak ... this is all incorrect and is all stemming from aspects of belief systems, but these beliefs are very real and they are mass belief systems and therefore are very influencing. Regardless if you are holding these belief systems individually or not, they may be affecting.
In this, individuals also hold underlying beliefs, as with yourself, that as you move through this focus and you disengage or you choose death, you shall emerge into a more perfect state. This is also incorrect, for you already occupy a perfect state! You merely move from one area to another area in disengaging physical focus.
There is another aspect that is experienced by individuals within a final focus, in that they are quite receptive – and partially objectively receptive – to the energy lent by other focuses. Therefore, it is seeming to these final focuses that they are encountering a surge of energy, which may be overwhelming at times, and is then translated into the feeling of fatigue.
MARY: Wow. I’ll have to think about that.
ELIAS: It is not necessarily that you are being lent more energy than any other focus by all of your focuses of essence, but that you hold more of an awareness of the energy which is lent. Therefore, objectively it becomes more affecting. All focuses are subjectively affecting of all other focuses, but individual focuses do not necessarily recognize or hold the awareness objectively of this influence and lending of energy.
This particular situation increases presently, for you are also responding within your own intake of energy to this present wave in consciousness which is occurring, addressing to the belief system of sexuality.
Now; also for your benefit – (to Dale) as your partner has requested the identification of these belief systems – let me clarify.
As I have stated previously, your creation of sexuality and emotion are not belief systems. They are base elements of this particular dimension, but you have created immense belief systems with respect to these two base elements of your reality. Therefore, there is a dual occurrence in addressing to this particular belief system, as shall be in the addressing to the belief system of emotion. In this, the addressing to this particular belief system appears more intense than the addressing to other belief systems.
This particular belief system holds very many aspects. There are multitudes of birds within this particular cage, elements that you do not think of as associated with this belief, for you identify this belief with the word, which – in your assessment – is quite narrow: “Sexuality applies merely to physical elements.” This is incorrect. There is much more involved with your creation of sexuality than merely physical elements. Therefore, this belief system holds MUCH energy.
In this, as you are also participating in this wave of consciousness presently, it is affecting physically with you in intensifying this situation of fatigue. It is increasing your responsiveness and your feeling of fatigue within this time period. This belief system, being as extensive as it is, shall continue to be addressed to for a time period, and within that time period, you also shall continue to be experiencing this intensified fatigue within your focus, within the most probable probability.
Now; be remembering that no element that I offer to you in information is an absolute. Therefore, you hold the ability to alter this probability in your own addressing to this belief system and your examining of the aspects of it that you hold, which shall be partially alleviating of this physical response that you hold presently.
In recognizing also that the designation of final focus is not a designation of excitement moving into greater enlightenment, but merely the designation of an action to be moving from one area of consciousness to another area of consciousness ... you continue to be you. In like manner to your physical movement to another country, you shall follow you to a new country and continue to be you, regardless that you alter your physical location.
The same holds for disengagement of physical focus. You are merely moving to another area of consciousness, but are continuing to be the essence that you are, and in this, you may also identify the aspects of belief that you hold in this area, and it may be affecting of alleviating elements of your fatigue also.
If you are looking to the now and recognizing that you are creating reality within each moment of the now, you may regain your zeal and your joyfulness within the now in THIS dimension, in THIS creation, in THIS experience, and not be projecting futurely in anticipation of what may come, but to be appreciating of the ability that you hold to be creating NOW.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
DALE: It’s my final focus too, correct?
DALE: I’d like to talk a little bit about my empathic sense that I’m playing with lately. First, I intuit that telepathy is an aspect of the empathic sense?
ELIAS: Telepathy is another inner sense.
DALE: It’s a separate inner sense?
DALE: Hmm! Okay....
ELIAS: Telepathy is your inner sense which allows you the ability to focus your attention upon the area of consciousness – with another individual – which creates thought; the energy of thought, which is reality, as you are aware. In this, exercising your telepathic sense is exercising your ability to be connecting and accessing another individual’s creation of their thought process, therefore allowing you a greater understanding of their perception as influenced through thought.
The empathic sense is your inner sense which allows you the ability to merge with another individual or thing, so to speak, and to be experiencing their experience. Therefore, if you are merging with another individual, as [an] example, you shall hold an awareness of yourself continued, but you shall also experience their experience fully; feel all of their feelings, all of their sense data – which they connect to through their outer senses – all of their physical and emotional feelings, and their energy centers and a communication of them.
DALE: Hmm! Feeling the energy centers ... that’s a good idea! I remember doing it with a dolphin and I also remember doing it with James twice within dreams, and actually, I’d like to know more about the connection between me and James. It seems like that sense came very easily; it comes very easily for me with James. Do our essences merge, or are we fragments of the same essence in counterpart action now, or ...?
ELIAS: No, you are not fragmented of the same essence, but your essences do engage the action of mergence in what you would express to be “at times.” There is an interaction that occurs in “mergence intermingling,” so to speak, therefore offering exchange of experiences and – translated into physical language – an exchange of concepts, in a manner of speaking.
This is a figurative term in relation to essence, for essence does not necessarily engage concepts in the manner that you think of within physical terms, but this would be the closest designation to the exchange which occurs within this type of mergence with these essences. This also allows the focuses more of an ease to be interconnecting.
But let me express to you also, do not be discounting of self and your creation and your ability within your individual focus, for much of this action that you experience and the ease of your participation in this empathic mergence with this individual is created by yourself and is agreed upon in compliance by your partner.
Therefore, I express to you, do not be “cosmitizing” (grinning) your own abilities!
DALE: Cosmitizing! I’m gonna have to look up that word!
MARY: Oh, I like that!
DALE: Cosmitizing! Okay. Thank you for the telepathy information too, ’cause I feel like that gives me a touchstone in a way, ’cause I couldn’t figure out where I should point my consciousness. And I was mistaken, thinking that it was part of the empathic.
ELIAS: It is merely a misunderstanding. It is not a mistake!
DALE: Ah! Touché!
MARY: Oh no! (Laughter, and Elias chuckles)
DALE: Does this have anything to do with how I talk for animals?
DALE: Okay. That’s almost like a lighter version of it, in a sense?
ELIAS: It is a slightly different action in your participation, but it is the same engagement, of partially allowing yourself to be merging with a creature and therefore allowing yourself access to information in concern to this creature.
As I have stated, you may be exercising your empathic sense with ANY element of your reality. It matters not that you consider the element to be living or not living. You may merge with a rock or a wall, and you may be allowing yourself the experience of these objects, for they also hold consciousness and ARE experiencing.
DALE: You’re quite good at it yourself! (Laughter)
ELIAS: Of course! (Grinning)
DALE: Of course! The All-Knowing! (Elias chuckles)
(To Mary) Would you like a turn?
MARY: Surely, if it’s okay. I guess I know that you’ve touched on this before, and I don’t want to be intruding on too much of an answer, if you don’t....
ELIAS: Personal invalidation!
MARY: I know, I know!
DALE: P.I., P.I.!
ELIAS: Merely engage your questioning, and you need not be qualifying!
MARY: Thank you. I was wondering if you could comment on my family of Sumari and my alignment with Milumet, and the obvious pull that they seem to have on my life, and ... could you comment on that?
ELIAS: These are interesting types of combinations with essence families, for they express, each, distinct differences. Therefore, individual focuses as yourself that choose to be manifesting with this type of combination of intents experience certain aspects of confusion and conflict at times.
The actions and qualities of the Sumari family move in the direction of excitement, drama, stirring and sparking of themselves and of other individuals. They also express, quite consistently, a lack of consistency! (Grinning at his own play on words)
MARY: That fits. Perfect!
ELIAS: They are, as I have expressed previously, the middle. They are the individuals that may be prodding, and in this, they may engage many different avenues for investigation which shall be exciting to them, but they do not hold the attention within ANY of these areas for what you would term to be long durations, for this is not in compliance with their intent. They do not hold interest in continuation of any concept, any action, any event, any element within their creation. They are quite passionate and creative.
Now; the Milumet hold a very different type of expression. Generally, in your terms, they may be much quieter, more subdued. They DO focus attention in ongoing situations and are quite diligent in quests.
In this, there is a similarity, that neither of these particular families align with officially accepted institutions or groups. Neither of these families holds an interest or a direction of attention that shall move them into aligning with officially accepted rules or officially accepted beliefs, societal creations, or the establishments of certain groups which find comfort in their shared ideas, so to speak. Both of these families are concerning themselves within their intent much more individually.
In this, they each lend energy to a movement – or an ease of a movement – for you to be stepping outside of officially accepted mass belief systems. But they also lend conflict, for there is a tendency or a leaning within yourself to focus upon a concept or an action, an event, an endeavor, a venture ... which you may present yourself initially with much excitement, which diminishes quickly, but you hold a continued fascination with this particular element and are creating of your dead mouse game! (Laughter)
For one aspect of yourself holds the readiness to discontinue action with certain creations. You have offered yourself the excitement, and therefore you also present yourself with the feeling of wishing to be moving to a new endeavor, to be creating excitement and drama once again. But the aspect of the Milumet moves you into a position of hesitation and an action of examining and re-examining and re-examining your creation! (Laughter)
MARY: That’s so true!
ELIAS: Therefore, in this movement you confuse yourself and you allow the “seeping in” – with your experience – of aspects of belief systems which confuse you more, for in this, you continue to hold yourself in the situation and continue to be playing with your dead mouse.
Now; let me express to you also that these two intents and qualities of these two families may be brought into harmony quite efficiently and may be lending much energy to you in your ventures and your creations, for you may allow yourself the excitement and also allow yourself the tempering – with the quality of the Milumet – to not be creating drama.
Drama and excitement are not synonymous. You may offer yourself excitement which shall produce motivation, but not continue the excitement into drama, which is the beginnings of conflict.
The Sumari may also temper the Milumet, in its temporariness and the recognition that it is unnecessary for you to be continuing to be re-evaluating and re-examining and re-assessing all of your creations over and over and over.
This merely lends energy to duplicity, for you begin to question yourself. You question your creations and you move into the direction of guessing and therefore not trusting.
The expression may be, (humorously) “Well ... perhaps ... maybe ... my initial expression is not entirely accurate or acceptable, and I shall re-evaluate and I shall be producing a BETTER scenario, and if I am examining this situation extensively and over and over again, FUTURELY I shall be accomplishing better!”
MARY: Finally getting it!
So you’re saying then to trust myself more initially, before it gets to be so conflicting that it becomes overwhelming, and then to more or less let it go ...
MARY: ... and move on.
ELIAS: And once again, we shall address with you – as with many other individuals in what you term to be recent time period within this action of this present wave in consciousness – our no conflict exercise, and I shall express to you that you may be engaging this no conflict exercise, and in this you shall discontinue your playing with your dead mouse, and you may identify clearly and quickly, in your terms, your conflict and how you may be alleviating of your conflict.
In this, you reinforce your acceptance of self, your trust of self. You do not lend energy to duplicity, and you also do not lend energy to the aspect of judgment or justification. You merely express an acceptance of self in expressing, “This is the identification of my conflict. This is the alleviation of my conflict.” Done!
MARY: Thank you very much, Elias.
ELIAS: You are very welcome. (Chuckling)
MARY: I’ll be looking into the no conflict exercise.
DALE: You don’t have to actually manifest dead mice like I do!
ELIAS: You may be inquiring of Michael, and he may be offering to you the no conflict exercise.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome. (Chuckling)
MARY: I guess if we could ... and this is really ... honestly, I can be very brief! (Elias grins) I was just wondering ... and I know I’m doing it again! Could you please comment – it’s a personal question – on my current relationship with my friend Jerry, and a follow-up on my relationship and “past” focuses with my friend John. (Pause)
ELIAS: With this individual that you identify as John, you have held other focuses with this individual, many of which [are] creating much conflict and irritation. You move in the direction of challenging each other in many different areas, which at times you identify as disagreement, and are playfully – and not playfully – expressing a lack of acceptance in the judgment of, “I am right; you are wrong.”
MARY: Is this John ...
MARY: ... or Jerry? John. Thank you.
ELIAS: This has continued through many focuses and has been quite efficient for you each in surfacing different challenges and allowing you the opportunity to view more of your own alignment with certain aspects of belief systems, and therefore also spurring you to be examining self and spurring you to be trusting of self at times, for there is a supportiveness and a lending of energy that occurs between you which facilitates this type of action.
You also hold future focus ... I am quite aware that you are a final focus, but all focuses are simultaneous. Therefore, there exists, in your terminology, a future focus presently, in which you are quite spurring of each other and quite challenging of each other in much playfulness, but also much agitation! (Chuckling)
This is not to say that you do not hold what you term to be in your terms closeness, for you do, for there is a trust of each other that you do not afford yourselves.
ELIAS: Correct, but you may also look to the trust that you hold for each other, and you may turn this trust and offer this to yourselves also.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome. As to this other individual, you hold one focus with this individual, and are establishing a continuation of a dynamic with this individual that has begun within another focus.
Now; I express to you, in this situation, you may also hold challenges. One challenge that may be presented to you by yourself repeatedly in the engagement of relationship with this individual is your own expression of justification, which may be an area that you may address to. The individual may be presenting different types of expressions that shall trigger you into your own thought process and feelings of your own justification.
Let me be reminding you that each time an individual is sparked into the presentment of this bird of justification, what is occurring in actuality is their agreement of their own lack of acceptance of self. This be the creation of hurt feelings or the thought process of being misunderstood or not heard.
This is not the creation of another individual. They are expressing through their perception, which is their reality and is real. You are receiving through your perception influenced by your belief systems, and are receiving in the manner of accentuating your own lack of acceptance of self and outwardly expressing this.
As the ball hits the wall, it is bouncing back in outward expression of justification of your own steadfastness in rightness, and in a frustration at times that is projected outwardly in the expression of, “YOU are not listening. YOU are not hearing.” This is expressed outwardly, and what you are expressing is the expression to self.
Another individual is NOT not hearing. YOU are not hearing and YOU are not listening with self.
This is not to say that the creation of relationships shall be riddled, so to speak, with pitfalls of challenges, but that this presentment is an area that you are moving into – within YOUR probabilities – of examination, to be more efficiently creating interaction within relationships.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
MARY: I’ll read that again. Thank you.
DALE: I have some quick questions!
ELIAS: Ah! (Laughter)
DALE: I would like the names and families and alignments of three of my friends.
ELIAS: Very well.
DALE: Eileen? (Pause)
ELIAS: Isha; I-S-H-A. (ee’sha) Essence family, Tumold; alignment, Vold.
DALE: Ah! I finally know another Vold! Tricia? (Pause)
ELIAS: Anselm; A-N-S-E-L-M. (on’chol) Essence family, Milumet; alignment, (chuckling) Zuli.
DALE: Patrice? (Pause)
ELIAS: Lais; L-A-I-S. (lace) Essence family, Borledim; alignment, Vold. This individual holds much intent within the action of this shift.
DALE: Hmm. Was I a dream walker? Did I have a dream walker focus? Did dream walkers have focuses? Dream walkers are focuses ... yes, dream walkers are focuses!
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking....
DALE: Right. I’m interested in that and in my connecting to stone circles, especially Avebury. My interest is in feeling how they were created. I feel how they were created, in a way. (15-second pause)
ELIAS: You are connecting with what you may term to be past focuses in the allowance of bleed-through, and this offers you an objective identification with certain creations and a draw to them. This, coupled with certain elements of similarities of creations of other-dimensional focuses, also is influencing, in a fascination in the manner of subjective comparison.
This may be likened to an individual within this dimension that occupies their attention within the profession of what you may term to be an archaeologist. In this, an archaeologist holds a fascination in comparisons of different societies and groups of individuals that create similarly.
In like manner, subjectively you hold a fascination in the area of comparison of different dimensions, and the similarities with some, in how they may be creating in certain aspects of their reality, creating certain structures or designs, so to speak, similarly.
There are creations within this dimension that hold similarity to creations or structures in other dimensions, and this be the draw that you hold in this area. Your participation in certain aspects of creation of some structures pastly lends energy to your fascination in this area. Are you understanding?
DALE: Yes. Thank you. In particular, was I helpful in Avebury?
ELIAS: No, but this offers you a curiosity in the design merely of the formation, in your own knowing of participation in the creation of structures that have required much energy and concentration. Let me express to you that you have participated, in your time framework and creation, within the physical location that you identify as Northern Africa, and ...
DALE: Would that be Egypt?
ELIAS: ... the creation of these structures. Your participation has been in the construction of what you term to be Sphinx. Therefore, in your subjective knowing of structural design – and energy which is required to be creating and the creativity which is expressed – you also hold a draw to all other creations within this dimension and other dimensions.
DALE: But like with the Sphinx, I wasn’t ... I don’t feel like I was totally physical in my participation. It feels more like it was a conscious participation more than a physical focus participation.
ELIAS: This has been a physical focus participation, in your participation in creating what you term to be plans or blueprints ...
DALE: Okay, that’s why I don’t....
ELIAS: ... not necessarily in the direction of manual labor.
DALE: Right, okay. That’s ... okay, thanks.
ELIAS: As to dream walkers, you hold an aspect of the dream walkers.
Let me express to you that any individual that is physically manifest presently within this dimension is not what you would term to a dream walker, so to speak, for these essences are not entirely physically focused and have chosen not to be entirely physically focused from the onset of the creation of this dimension.
But through the action of fragmentation, as each essence fragmented holds all of the qualities of the fragmenting essence, there is aspect of dream walker within many individuals that ARE physically manifest, within the essences that choose to be physically manifest. Therefore, there is an interconnectedness and there are lendings of energy in certain qualities held by dream walkers.
Now; let me also express to you NOT to be confusing yourself in movement into a direction of identifying dream walkers as differentiated from other essences, as being higher or better. They have merely chosen a different expression. They are not different in essence. Their choice is different. Therefore, they do not hold better qualities than any other essence. They merely hold different choices for experience.
In this, the lending of energy within the aspect of dream walker may be facilitating within your widening of awareness, your own accessing and exercising of your inner senses, and your abilities to be moving through consciousness while participating within physical focus.
DALE: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
MARY: Elias, unless you’d like to break first, I was wondering if I could please have John’s essence name and his family, and also Jerry’s? (Pause)
ELIAS: First individual, essence name, Sandra.
ELIAS: Correct. Essence family, Sumari; alignment, Zuli.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: Second individual, essence name, Quithe; Q-U-I-T-H-E. (kwithe) Essence family, Sumafi; alignment, Sumari.
MARY: Hmm. Like Michael. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
DALE: Not all physical focuses incorporate belief systems, correct?
ELIAS: Not all physical DIMENSIONS incorporate belief systems.
DALE: Oh. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
DALE: I’d like to know what the sparks are that I see, those sparks.
ELIAS: Energy ...
DALE: Oh, okay. I figured that!
ELIAS: ... that you allow yourself to view objectively.
MARY: Like the thing to the side. I get this movement, this circle of movement off to the side of my periphery.
ELIAS: This is a different action.
ELIAS: This is the incorporation of vision which is influenced by bleed-through of other-dimensional focuses, and viewing through your physical eyes their own vision.
MARY: Their own vision?
ELIAS: Correct, through your eyes. Therefore, you also hold the allowance within yourself to view what they view, how they view.
MARY: That is very cool! Thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
DALE: Is that the same kind of action as when ... like wavery, like a spot will be very wavery to me?
DALE: It’s the same kind of thing?
DALE: I would like to ask a question for Vic, and this is how she would like it presented, being a Sumafi. (Laughing)
“Recently, Bobbi had an unusual experience with rapid heartbeat. Another individual, who will remain anonymous, has had very similar experiences in the last few months.” (Elias chuckles)
Let’s just guess! (Laughter)
“On the day of Bobbi’s experience, there was an unusual number of people in the emergency room with heart-related conditions. On that same day, I woke up with a chest pain on the left side of my body, which is still there. Finally, the woman who took Bobbi’s place in the emergency room had the last name of Elias.” (Elias chuckles)
“Can you offer some insight into this imagery?”
ELIAS: HA HA! Lawrence! (Dale and Mary crack up)
DALE: That’s more than a chuckle!
ELIAS: I shall express to Lawrence, and also to Jale, interesting imagery, is it not, the presentment of this name? Which is also the presentment of a temporary individual – a pop-in, so to speak – to be offered for the gaining of attention. (1)
In this, this action in experience is being experienced by many individuals presently.
Now; look to your imagery that you present yourselves with.
Presently, as I have expressed, you address en masse collectively within a wave of consciousness to the belief system of sexuality – which is a base element foundational block, so to speak, of this physical dimension – and you associate this particular element of your physical form, your physical body, as your life source.
Your heart is that aspect of your physical form that YOU view within your objective beliefs as your core, your center, your life force, your driving energy, that particular aspect of your physical form which directs and pumps your physical form. Therefore, it is directing of all of your focus, for in its continuation, you continue. In its discontinuation, you discontinue physically.
In this, the belief system being addressed to is also directed to what you may term to be a life force. It is the element of your creation within this physical focus which directs all of your creations.
Your other element of this dimension, for experience, is emotional, but this is the color of the experiences. This is the element of the hue to your painting, the colors in your painting. This is your emotion. The painting itself is the sexuality; the canvas and the paint. The physical aspects of your dimension is the sexuality ... and the perception, the mental aspects. The outward expression of all of your reality is the creation of the sexuality.
Therefore, you may identify these two elements of imagery quite similarly. They are physical and they are the base element – the life force – of your reality.
In this, as I have stated previously, within this time period presently, in this final year of your century and of your millennium, your energy, your movement accelerates. It becomes more intensified. Much energy has been lent throughout your ages to this time period, and in this, you have great access to this energy. In its intensity, the action of this shift is accelerated. Therefore, the movement of addressment to belief systems is also accelerated and intensified.
You present en masse within this wave your expression to yourselves, in the KNOWING of this movement and your movement with it, objective imagery in physical creations. Some individuals are experiencing much physical affectingness within the area of their orange energy center. Many individuals are experiencing in physical area of heart, for it is your life-generating element of your physical form.
It is not, for your consciousness is your life-generating element, (grinning) but within your beliefs, your heart is your driving force.
Therefore, you also create imagery of its movement accelerating and intensifying, which may be creating of uncomfortableness physically, but you are also experiencing uncomfortableness in other areas of your reality in your addressment to this belief system and your examination of this belief system, for this is an uncomfortable belief system to view!
There are many, many aspects of this belief system that you accept as not beliefs, as merely elements of your reality that are outside of beliefs, and they are not. They are aspects of your belief. Therefore, there is difficulty in the addressment to this belief, and you may view the action of this individually and en masse, for it shall be also accelerating, and you shall be experiencing the intensity as THIS wave crests! (Chuckling)
DALE: Yippee! Oh, good! (Laughter) She has two game things too: a new category of physical imagery, pneumonia, Borledim. (Pause)
DALE: Same category, heart conditions, Ilda.
ELIAS: One point.
DALE: Okay. There you go, Vic! Hi! (Elias chuckles)
Vic’s note: Hi Dale, and thanks!
DALE: Do you want to ask about your dream this morning?
MARY: Yes, because I think Mary needs to go pretty soon.
I had a dream last night or early this morning, and basically, Dale and I were driving over a bridge. Dale was driving and I was in the passenger side, and we were way, way, way high up over a body of water, and Dale was talking to me like she does, yakity-yak, and she wasn’t watching the road, and twice tried to drive off the road. Our wheels went off, and we came back in. Down the road again, she was talking, and we drove right off the cliff. There was no guard rail.
The car disappeared, and the two of us were just face-to-face, watching each other’s expressions and just kind of falling, but not really falling in gravity, and just before we hit the water, it was almost like freeze-frames. We stopped, almost floating above the water, and then we fell into the water, and it was warm ... and everything was okay. I just wondered if you had a comment on that.
ELIAS: Very well. This is your presentment of your imagery to yourself, in that your vehicle is the symbolization of your physical focus and the encasement of your physical form.
In this, you appear to be allowing distractions in your movement of this focus, but notice the imagery that you have allowed yourself. You are traveling within the encasement, so to speak, together; the imagery of physical form, physical focuses together.
One is distracted and is continuing on and is moving off of your bridge, so to speak. The other holds concern for this action and is questioning of this action and the safety of this action. The one plunges (laughter) in the risk, but also in the trust. The other is questioning but is following, and in this following, the vehicle disappears.
The encasement or the expression physically has disappeared, and there is the movement to the emergence into the fullness of essence in expression. This be the water. There is a hesitation prior to the immersion, for there is a questioning of the safety once again, but the action is continued and the immersion allowed, and this is the allowance of the connection of essence and the knowing that there is no need for fearfulness or protection, for there is no element of unsafety in this movement and this immersion.
MARY: Therefore, the gentle mergence with the water, and the warmth.
MARY: Thank you.
DALE: Are there any nice little labels for mine and Mary’s relationship?
MARY: (Laughing) Well put, Dale!
DALE: Are we like, you know, counterparts, opposite counterparts, or any one of those kind of names?
ELIAS: You are not opposite counterparts.
DALE: I didn’t think that!
ELIAS: Were you opposite counterparts, I would venture to express to you that you would not be engaging THIS action ...
MARY: (Laughing) I knew he was going to say that!
ELIAS: ... jointly together this day, but would be repelling each other quite efficiently!
DALE: Am I that with her son Kyle? Are we counterparts?
MARY: You mean Colin?
DALE: No? Bummer! We repulse each other, though.
ELIAS: There is a counterpart action that is held between your son and this son ...
DALE: Oh! Kyle and Spencer? Okay.
ELIAS: ... and this is creating of your magnet situation.
DALE: Oh, okay.
ELIAS: As for yourselves, you are not engaging counterpart action presently, although you have engaged counterpart action previously. Presently, you have moved into a position of helpfulness to each other in lending energy to each other for the accomplishment of your individual widenings of awareness. Therefore, you have moved from counterpart action into an agreement to be sharing energy and offering challenge and helpfulness and supportiveness to each other.
DALE: Thank you. We have this thing called time that we’ve created limits for today....
ELIAS: Quite! (Laughter)
MARY: Yes! Yes, we do!
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
MARY: Thank you so much.
ELIAS: And I express to you each much encouragement in your movement and your explorations.
(To Mary) And much encouragement to you to be rediscovering your appreciation for your creations within the now, not merely your anticipation futurely.
MARY: Thank you.
ELIAS: And to you each this day, I offer great affection, and I express to you a very fond au revoir.
Elias departs at 12:50 PM.
(1) This is actually quite interesting. Bobbi and I watched this one question and answer together on Monday, April 5, 1999. As soon as Elias said “pop-in,” I got an image of a woman I saw in a bank in 1997. So, I told Bobbi about this, and she asked me to describe the woman, and then said the woman in the hospital looked VERY similar. This was surprising to both of us! (reference session 152, February 09, 1997)
© 1999 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.