Sunday, July 09, 2000
ďImpossibility Becomes PossibleĒ
ďAltering Physical ManifestationsĒ
ďDuplicity Ė A Method of EvaluationĒ
ďYou Are The Creator AND The CreationĒ
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Steve (Anton).
Elias arrives at 12:34 PM. (Arrival time is 17 seconds.)
ELIAS: Good morning!
STEVE: Good morning, Elias. How are you doing? As always?
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha!
STEVE: (Laughing) The minute I said that, I knew your reply, so I just had to get it out first! (Elias chuckles) I guess today, with my session here, Iíd like to try some validations on some guesses I have for my childrenís family, alignment, and orientation.
ELIAS: Very well.
STEVE: Okay. My oldest daughter Dawn, I kinda get her family as Milumet/Sumari, and that sheís soft in orientation. (Pause)
STEVE: Correct. Could I get her essence name? (Pause)
ELIAS: Essence name, Laffele; L-A-F-F-E-L-E. (la-fellí)
STEVE: Thank you. For my daughter Carolyn, Iím guessing she is Sumari, Sumafi, common. (Pause)
ELIAS: Reverse in Sumari, Sumafi.
STEVE: She is common?
STEVE: May I have her essence name? (Pause)
ELIAS: Essence name, Yaunde; Y-A-U-N-D-E. (yonída)
STEVE: Thank you. Letís see. My son Steve Ė I think heís Gramada, Borledim, common. (Pause)
STEVE: Oh, correct! May I have his essence name? (Pause)
ELIAS: Essence name, Fernad; F-E-R-N-A-D. (fer-nšdí)
STEVE: Thank you. Letís see. I guess next would be my grandson Jacob. He was just born a couple of months ago, and I had Sumafi, Milumet, common. (Pause)
ELIAS: Sumafi, Tumold.
STEVE: Tumold, okay.
ELIAS: Common, correct.
STEVE: Okay. May I have his essence name?
ELIAS: Essence name, Vincente; V-I-N-C-E-N-T-E. (vin-cenítay)
STEVE: I have a friend that I would like to take a shot at here. Karen Ė Sumari, Zuli, intermediate. (Pause)
STEVE: May I have her essence name? (Pause)
ELIAS: Essence name, Annell; A-N-N-E-L-L. (an-nellí)
STEVE: Could I get her vibrational quality of color? (Pause)
ELIAS: Vibrational color translation (pause) would be an identification of quite pale pink.
STEVE: Thank you. Iím gonna take a shot here with my brother Tom. Is he intermediate? (Pause)
STEVE: Would our former president Ronald Reagan be intermediate?
STEVE: No, okay. Just something I heard on TV made me think....
Itís interesting, or I just find it interesting, that I have a number of friends that are intermediate and common ... I mean, intermediate and soft. Iím sorry. And I just find it ... just different! (Elias chuckles) You know, it seems like I have more of that than what my own orientation is. Is there any reason for that particularly, or am I just noticing it?
ELIAS: (Chuckling) You ARE noticing, and I may express to you also that you are allowing yourself to be drawing yourself to individuals expressing different orientations, that you may allow yourself more of an understanding of the identifications of these orientations, and also that you may allow yourself to view how you may be interactive with individuals holding different orientations and not be creating obstacles or conflict, as you allow yourself to trust your own expression without judgment.
For in the judgment of other individuals, you first are creating a judgment within self and the discounting of self, and this is the expression that creates the outward manifestation of judgment upon other individuals.
In this, you are allowing yourself to be expressing a comfort, so to speak, within your own expression, which also allows for the acceptance of the movement and expressions of other individuals, which also moves in alignment with our discussion previously of your intent within this focus.
STEVE: Itís just interesting. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
STEVE: I have a question here. In the prior session, you helped me with a dream, and two individuals, Bill and George Firth, were in it, and I had a dream not too long ago where I saw them in gray clothing, and youíve told me before that black and white and variations thereof were part of my dream trigger, and I just wondered if my impressions were right, that these two men were going to kill or murder a sheriff for a perceived wrong, for an attempted hanging. Was that a dream in which I was focusing in on those focuses? (Pause)
STEVE: Interesting. Would that have been somewhere around the Kentucky/Ohio area in the 1850s? (Pause)
ELIAS: Physical location, correct. Slightly earlier within time framework.
STEVE: In my other session also, you told me the two easiest focuses I could connect with, and I just had some impressions about that, and the first one would have been a 1400s Native American, and I wondered if he was aware of the Norsemen or the Vikings, and possibly had been captured by them and hobbled, and in his own anger, he had set them up for an attack. (Pause)
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct in this individualís participation in aggressive encounter with these individuals.
STEVE: Interesting. Letís see. The other focus you told me about was an 11th century Indonesian woman, and I came up with the name of Joanya, I guess, and I wondered if she was a dwarf and a dancer, or taught dancing, and she was quite sexually active. I wondered if this was a correct impression. (Pause)
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
STEVE: Interesting. Iím kind of amazing myself with what I consider guesses here!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha!
STEVE: Mainly because I think itís more of a thing of noticing, because itís thoughts or things that I come across rather than a specific meditation on something.
ELIAS: Quite, but also the allowance of your noticing, and not discounting of what you are offering to yourself.
STEVE: Interesting. Thank you.
ELIAS: In this, be remembering that these other focuses, which you have offered to yourself in some information, may be helpful to you in relation to this focus that you are participating within now.
Each of these individuals has created a manifestation within their focus of what may be termed to be physical disability, in your assessment.
STEVE: Interesting. Thank you. Iíll explore later, and next time Iíll get some more validation, perhaps!
ELIAS: Ha ha! Very well!
STEVE: Good! Thank you! Am I emotionally focused within my current focus?
STEVE: Am I the final focus or designated final focus?
STEVE: Okay. Am I in transition now? (Pause)
ELIAS: Yes, although not experiencing an intensity of that action.
STEVE: Interesting. Is this why ... and I just thought of this question. I find myself a lot of times thinking about disengaging, whether to stick around or not. Itís been part of my life for the last thirty years or so, and I just find it interesting sometimes, and I block it. At times it causes depression and such like that. But could this be part of what it is to be a final focus?
ELIAS: At times, individuals that are the designated final focus do create this type of experience or feeling in a type of response to restlessness, in a manner of speaking. This is not to say that this is a rule within the designated final focus role, for there are many individuals that do not create this type of experience or feeling in the role of the final focus, but I may also express to you that these types of experiences are not uncommon.
STEVE: Okay, thank you. That gives me more things to ponder. (Elias chuckles) Each of these sessions Ė and the session I had with you Ė give me many things to ponder, and I thank you for that!
ELIAS: Ha ha! You are quite welcome! (Chuckling)
STEVE: Letís see. I have a question about my daughter Carolyn. I just wondered, is she politically focused? (Pause)
ELIAS: Interesting identification! I am acknowledging of your allowance within your impressions. Yes, you are correct.
STEVE: Well, sheís a political science teacher, so I donít know if that was a gimme or not, but I was just curious about that.
Have you given us much information about being emotionally, thought, politically, and religiously focused yet?
ELIAS: I have not offered a tremendous expression of information concerning these different associations with personality types in this physical dimension yet.
STEVE: Okay. Will it be coming at some point? Are we ready for it?
ELIAS: I shall be futurely offering information concerning these identifications.
Within this present now, individuals are focusing their attention in relation to waves in consciousness that are occurring, and also with the identification of the perceptions of orientations. Therefore, in response to the movement of energy which is occurring presently, I am addressing to the subject matters that are immediately relevant to the experiences of the individuals presently. These particular identifications of personality qualities are not overtly holding individualsí attentions presently.
STEVE: Well, thank you. Itís just something that had been brought up recently. You know, just curious about it.
Let me go back to a couple of other things. Like I had mentioned previously, my dream trigger was black and white, and objectively, the other day I was sitting outside, and a dragonfly landed, oh, a couple of feet from my foot, and it had a black body, and its wings were black, white, and clear, and some of its legs were black with white markings. It was white on black. The dragonfly landed on a blade of grass, took off and circled, and re-landed. It did this three times, and then it landed on my big toe and repeated the same process, which I found interesting. I wondered if this was, aside from being my dream trigger, was this an indication to me to be more objectively aware in my objective state, or is it pointing out to me that I can contact my subjective state more?
STEVE: I just wondered if you could comment on that.
ELIAS: This is imagery that you present to yourself in relation to both identifications that you are inquiring of. It may be applied, so to speak, within your objective awareness, and also within your dream state. For you allow yourself to be creating imagery of this small creature interacting with you, but also creating this circular motion and presenting itself in the objective manifestation of black and white. This may be identified not merely as your dream trigger, but also, within your objective waking awareness and your allowance of yourself to be noticing the automatic movements, in what you identify as either/or, which may also be translated in the identification of black and white.
STEVE: Something else to think about!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) As you allow yourself to be noticing of these actions more and more, you widen your awareness, and in that action, you also open to your periphery within your objective awareness, and in this, you allow yourself to become more familiar with your own movements and your own automatic responses in interaction with other individuals AND within self.
For be remembering, the automatic responses that you create are quite influenced by your belief systems, and in this, as you continue to widen your awareness and allow yourself to be noticing your own behaviors, your own expressions, your own automatic responses, you offer yourself more information in the identification of the belief systems that you align with, and therefore allow yourself an opening of the door, so to speak, into the expression of acceptance.
STEVE: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
STEVE: I guess another thing is, Iíd like to ask you for some help with a dream I had a couple days ago. Objectively, on the news, I guess we had a Bigfoot sighting about sixty miles from here in Cave Junction, which was interesting Ďcause it was on the news.
That night I had a dream where I was trying to shoot Bigfoot with a pump-action .22, but the bullets kept coming out with an odd sound and were very ineffective, and I went to look for another gun. And suddenly, two individuals appeared before me. They were a deep green color and they were rather chubby, and they seemed to be wearing red felt hats with antenna coming out of their heads, and I thought they were fairies. We had a great conversation and such like that, and I wondered if you could give me some help with them.
I had a thought, just briefly. They had a deep green color, and you said my vibrational quality of color was sea green, and I wondered if there was some kind of connection with that.
ELIAS: Offer to me, in this present now, what is your impression associated with the dream imagery that you have created?
STEVE: Well, I kind of wondered ... the two people, there was kind of a duality with them. I guess what Iím trying to say is, recently, which I found surprising in myself, and I think Mary and I were just talking about this, Iíve been investigating this material. In fact, itís almost the basis for my objective, philosophical outlook, and just recently I have found doubts in myself, where I was wondering, am I going in the right direction? Iíve just had doubts about a lot of this stuff, and Iíve wondered if this is why I was trying to shoot Bigfoot with a .22. Then all of a sudden, I have these two gremlins or fairies talking to me. I donít remember any of the conversation, but perhaps itís an affirmation that Iím on a good track for myself. (Elias chuckles) Thatís kind of what Iíve interpreted for myself.
ELIAS: I express to you that you have created this dream imagery in response to the movement of energy in relation to this wave in consciousness addressing to the belief system of duplicity.
In this, you are experiencing, as you have expressed, this doubtfulness or wondering in relation to your own movement and your alignment with certain philosophies or information, and you also present to yourself this creature within your imagery, and are attempting to be eliminating of this creature, but view yourself to be unsuccessful in your attempt.
The creature, within your imagery, is your representation of unfamiliarity and impossibility. These expressions are associated quite closely, in a manner of speaking, with this shift in consciousness, and as you continue to be moving in the expression of this shift in consciousness and inserting it into your objective reality, you also present yourself with more unfamiliar elements and more expressions of impossibility that become possible.
But the hold of the familiar within your thought process is strong. The foothold of your beliefs within your reality is also strong.
Therefore, although you continue within your movement in your expression of insertion of this shift, you also bounce back and forth, so to speak, in some manners, for you are presenting to yourself this belief system of duplicity, which questions all that you create within your reality. It is your method of evaluation.
Therefore, as this wave in consciousness continues, you are presenting your own expressions to yourself in conjunction with it and allowing yourself movement in evaluation of this particular belief system, offering certain expressions of doubt and questioning, but also allowing yourself the expression of trust within self, and the understanding objectively that these expressions matter not. They are, in a manner of speaking, objective trickery, and are methods in which you present yourself with expressions to be confusing yourself, and also diverting your attention.
The expression of the two creatures, so to speak, or unusual individuals, (chuckling) are your expression of two manifestations of yourself, which are representative of the offering of identification of this duplicity.
STEVE: Thank you. Thatís interesting. Thatís very interesting, what the two individuals represent. Interesting.
ELIAS: Within YOUR beliefs.
ELIAS: And you also present them to yourself in the identification of unrealistic beings, so to speak, or fantasy, which in underlying beliefs is deemed impossible, once again.
STEVE: Well, thank you again. Like I said, each time I talk to you or read a session, I get much to think about and ponder!
ELIAS: Ha ha!
STEVE: Letís see here. Well, I do have one other question which Iíve debated since our last session, but I donít quite know how to put the question. I guess Iím kind of like a lawyer here, looking for a loophole with my disability. Iím trying to look for ways, and itís probably lack of acceptance of it, but just to get mobility, or more mobility, instead of creating less mobility. I donít quite know how to ask the question, but I wondered if you could comment on that.
ELIAS: In this situation, let me express to you, the concentration upon the lack of mobility is the expression which perpetuates the lack of mobility. Are you understanding that statement?
STEVE: I think I am.
ELIAS: In this, the key to the expression that you are concerning yourself with is to be recognizing what you are already creating, and therefore allowing yourself to turn your perception, remembering that your perception is the instrument that creates your reality, and therefore is all-encompassingly powerful.
Regardless of the appearance of physical manifestations or outward affectingnesses, your perception is powerful enough to be altering instantaneously any manifestation which is created physically.
Now; in this situation, I am understanding of the direction and nature of your question, and in response to your question, you allow yourself a partial recognition of what you are creating presently, but it is a surface, general identification of what you are creating in the now.
In this, you look to your physical manifestation, and you may offer to yourself a general identification. Yes, you are creating this as your reality. Yes, you are continuing to be creating this manifestation presently. But you are not identifying entirely, objectively, the genuineness of that creation, in that you are CHOOSING to be creating this each moment.
You are overlaying, so to speak, the identification of the creation with this blanket, so to speak, expressing an identification of the physical manifestation as some element that is other than you; some element that is expressed BY you, but is not you. There is a separation created between your identification of you and your identification of the manifestation. The manifestation, therefore, becomes an entity of its own, in your perception.
Therefore, as you focus your attention upon the manifestation, essentially you are focusing your attention upon an entity, in a manner of speaking, within your perception. Therefore, your perception continues to create the entity.
Now; your question is presented in a framework of mobility; not necessarily in the elimination of the entity, but in the movement WITH the entity to be creating a greater expression of physical mobility, correct?
ELIAS: (Chuckling) In this, your mobility or lack of mobility is assessed and created in relation to your perception of the grip of the entity upon you.
STEVE: Interesting Ė pretty interesting! Iíll await this transcript eagerly. Youíve presented me with some amazing things to think about that Iíd never even considered.
ELIAS: Think to your entity of your Sasquatch within your dream imagery, and the ability of this creature to be gripping you and holding you and creating what you perceive to be an immobility of yourself in its grip, for it is larger and more powerful than are you, for you assess it to be separated from you as an entity.
In this, you also perceive yourself to be powerless, and as you project your attention in a manner that creates a perception of an entity outside of you or that is not you, that is separated from you regardless that it may be created by you, that is not to say that it IS you.
Therefore, as you continue to focus your attention in this manner, you also continue to provide energy to the perpetuation of its creation and of its power, and of your LACK of power. Therefore, you limit your choices and you limit your mobility.
STEVE: Interesting again! Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome, my friend.
STEVE: Itís a whole new tact that I hadnít even thought about. As always, much to think about!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha! I offer to you the suggestion that you allow yourself to ponder the empowerment of yourself, recognizing that you are not merely the creator, but you are also the CREATION.
STEVE: Interesting. Thank you. I appreciate it, as always!
ELIAS: And you are welcome, as always! Ha ha ha ha ha!
STEVE: (Laughing) Letís see. I find it interesting, the difference ... and this just popped into my mind. Iíve got a watch here and Iím looking at the time, and comparatively, from the last session to this session , it seems like Iím in kind of a time warp. In this session, I keep thinking that a lot of time has passed, and I keep looking at the clock, and actually, not that much time has passed, whereas last time it seemed to go awfully quick. This time itís slower. Just an interesting perception on my part.
ELIAS: You are allowing yourself to be assimilating information, not merely subjectively but objectively also, in part, and in this action, you are creating an alteration in your perception.
(Intently) Be aware of what I am expressing to you in literal terms. Recognize and witness what you are creating in this interaction presently with myself. You are, in actuality, slowing time movement, and this is created through the action of your perception.
Perception is not merely the viewing of your reality. It is not merely an assessment of your reality. It is an instrument or a type of mechanism within you that actually CREATES a reality. This is not imagination!
Therefore, allow yourself the recognition, in what you are noticing now, that you are in actuality creating a reality of slowing time. This is not what you identify as fantasy or imagination ... or the discounting of your abilities through the expression of, ďIt is merely a feeling, but it is not quite reality.Ē It IS reality.
If you may slow time or create more of a rapid movement of time Ė an element that you view to be absolute and that you individually do not alter Ė allow yourself to view the power of what you may be creating in other expressions that you may view to be less absolute.
STEVE: Interesting. Well, thank you again!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) You are quite welcome!
STEVE: I guess Iíve run out of questions for now. Thank you again.
One last thing. Sandel, or Fran who is Sandel, I talked to her just the other day and asked her if she had anything, and she said, ďNot really.Ē But we were talking about accepting and it matters not and such like that, and noticing, and she said, ďAwareness is the shits.Ē (Elias grins) I think she was just referring to a lot of things, and she finds herself discounting herself more, and I wondered if there was anything you would want me to relay to her.
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha! I may express, this also may be viewed as an expression in relation to this wave in consciousness addressing to duplicity, and I shall be acknowledging of her experience! For at times, within the challenges that you present yourself with and the confusion that you experience in widening your awareness, I am quite understanding of this type of identification! Ha ha!
STEVE: (Laughing) Well, you gave me an answer, and the reason I mention that is because she got out her crystal ball and said, ďI know what heís going to tell me, to wait till my session ,Ē but Iím going to fool her! Her crystal ball was wrong!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! Ah, these crystal balls, they are so faulty! (Chuckling)
STEVE: (Laughing) Yes, I know! Iíve got mine in the service shop right now! Iím gonna get an oil change on it! (Elias chuckles)
Well, Elias, once again, I appreciate all that youíve given me, as always. I canít express it enough times, how much youíve given me, so many things to think about, and giving me opening avenues for my explorations. And once again, thank you very much for the session.
ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend. I continue in my encouragement with you and my offering of energy to you, and you may express my greetings to Sandel.
STEVE: I shall!
ELIAS: Ha ha! I express to you great affection, and anticipation of our next meeting.
STEVE: Thank you.
ELIAS: To you this day, au revoir.
STEVE: Au revoir.
Elias departs at 1:28 PM.
© 2000 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.