the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.

Home

Introduction

Digests

Transcripts

Exercises

Gems

Library

Search

Donate

Sunday, February 18, 2001

<  Session 781 (Private/Phone)  >

ďMyths and LegendsĒ

ďA New Reality with New Explanations and DefinitionsĒ

ďCaliforniaís Energy CrisisĒ


Participants: Mary (Michael) and Howard (Bosht).

Elias arrives at 1:47 PM. (Arrival time is 28 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good morning!

HOWARD: Good morning! Itís been some time since we last spoke.

ELIAS: (Chuckling) In your terms! Ha ha ha!

HOWARD: Well, in my terms, we also managed to have two sessions cancelled, and I wondered what was THAT about, but then I do understand Maryís on-going situation, and I give her all the energy I can muster for her.

ELIAS: Ah! And what is the identification of YOUR situation? (Chuckling)

HOWARD: Well, funny you should mention that!

ELIAS: HA HA HA!

HOWARD: I cannot put my thoughts together in a way that I admire from Rodney, for example. These are different things that have occurred over the past almost six months now since weíve spoken. Iíd like to go through these impressions quickly and get them out of the way. One of them is an impression that Iíve had several times that Margot is the entity known as Sacagawea. (Pause)

ELIAS: And you are inquiring as to a validation of this impression?

(Pause) Yes.

HOWARD: The next one is an observation that our myths, the myths that we bring down through time, are actually a Dream Walkerís reality.

ELIAS: Not necessarily. Your myths are created through the expression of imagination, and imagination is an expression of filtering what is known within consciousness into the translation which may be expressed within your reality, in the context of your reality.

Therefore, it is not necessarily the experience or the creation of the Dream Walkersí expressions. It may be associated with many different expressions of consciousness or creations of consciousness, but translated into your reality in a manner which complies with the blueprint of your reality, that which you objectively understand.

HOWARD: Jade, our friend the shaman, referred to myth as the archetypes, archetypically working out or moving through or displaying action Ė I forget his exact words Ė but that they were archetypes, metaphors that we had set up. I had taken that one step further in saying that the Dream Walkers were the archetypes.

ELIAS: This is also another translation. In actuality, what I am expressing to you is the actual nature of what is being created in the expression of myth or legend. It is actually an expression of imagination, and imagination is quite real. Imagination is the filtration into your physical dimension of what is known and what has been created within consciousness.

HOWARD: Okay. One more thought, scattered as it is. We, Margot and I, have decided that the space program and the man on the moon, the Apollo series, that we have not landed on the moon. Is this correct?

ELIAS: (Chuckling) In physical terms?

HOWARD: Yes.

ELIAS: Yes, you have!

HOWARD: Okay. Last December, a friend of mine, or an acquaintance of mine, passed away. His name was Gage T. I didnít hear of his passing until a couple of weeks ago, and I was very distraught. I have tried to figure out where my emotions were coming from, because I was crying a great deal. After talking with Margot and my friends in the CC chat room, Iíve come up with a conclusion that perhaps itís not about Gageís passing that I was upset with, but rather the termination of a relationship that we were developing.

Even though I do think that Gage and myself were and are very connected through many lifetimes, I feel very emotional again as I speak about it, that Iíve lost contact with an old friend, who we allowed ourselves to meet and rekindle a friendship, and heís gone again! (Emotionally) And this distresses me, because I donít understand where the feeling is coming from. Thatís my question.

ELIAS: And I shall express to you, Bosht, the suggestion that you allow yourself to approach yourself in a different manner in altering your question. Your question that you pose to yourself is concerning your lack of understanding as to where this emotion is coming from, in your terms.

Now; I may express to you, in actuality this is what you are expressing to yourself objectively, for your confusion is, in actuality, not with the emotion but with the contents of the emotion. For I may express to you, you have already offered yourself thought processes and validations, in a manner of speaking, from yourself and through your interaction with other individuals which justifies the expression of the emotion, but you continue to be questioning the emotion for these justifications are inadequate.

The reason the justifications are inadequate is that you are attempting to offer yourself explanations in relation to a reality that you are no longer creating. Therefore, the explanations that you are offering to yourself do not fit within the reality that you are now creating.

Let me express to you quite genuinely and quite realistically: in this time framework we have spoken much concerning this shift in consciousness, and many of you have allowed yourselves to be viewing the concept of this shift in consciousness, but continuing to view this as a future event. I have expressed to you within your physical time framework of this previous year Ė and continue to do so Ė that now you are inserting this shift in consciousness into your objective realities. Therefore, it moves from the expression of concept into the expression of reality.

What is meant by this is that you have actually already altered your reality. Your reality continues to alter in what you may term to be a day-by-day action, a moment-by-moment action. It is, in actuality, being created differently. Therefore, the definitions that may have applied concerning your reality previously do not fit any longer in the reality that you are now creating.

HOWARD: Thatís right.

ELIAS: Therefore, as you experience a movement such as this expression that you are creating now, and have been in relation to this subject matter of this individual and their choice of disengagement or what you term to be death, you seek out explanation and definitions for your expressions which no longer fit within your present experience of reality. They may have been justified, so to speak, previously in the reality that you have created previously. But in a manner of speaking, those explanations and definitions are meaningless in THIS reality.

And this is, in actuality, the nature of your questioning, not ďwhere is this emotion coming from,Ē in your words, but ďwhat is the expression of this emotion? What is its definition in relation to this reality that I am now participating within and creating?Ē Therefore, what is the communication?

HOWARD: Yes, and I think I said pretty much the same thing, that this was a shift deal, and my awareness of a casual acquaintance, of his passing and the emptiness that I feel, was and is a part of this shift.

ELIAS: It is a new recognition that you offer to yourself in this altered expression of reality.

HOWARD: Yes, it is.

ELIAS: And in this, shall we explore what the actual identification and communication of this sadness and this emptiness is?

HOWARD: I believe that I can do that.

ELIAS: Very well.

HOWARD: And I believe that what Iíve learned from this will be very helpful to me, at least to recognize in the future.

ELIAS: Indeed! And if you are so choosing, I express to you my continued offering that I shall be available to be offering explanation, if you wish.

HOWARD: Okay. Thank you, thatís fine. That is fine. Iíll be taking you up on that, Iím sure, in the future. (Elias smiles and nods)

ELIAS: Very well, my friend.

HOWARD: My next ... well, let me skip this; I think weíve answered this, or rather it has been answered in the past.

Another short, what I perceive to be a short thing, my perception of the electrical power problem in California certainly is something of a mass consciousness idea, as well as some kind of conflict, a duality, a very conflicted point of view that theyíre coming up with.

For some time, probably 30 years, I have had in my mind a device which seemed very reasonable to me in physical terms. Itís shaped like a dodecahedron. It is a hollow sphere with a porthole. The object is to generate heat, and it attracts the sun, this porthole does. Inside is a multi-faceted mirror system which generates heat inside, enough so that it would be able to generate power, that is, by steam. And it strikes me that this would be a solution that could be pursued. It has been there in my head for all these years, and Iím wondering if Iím correct in my observation?

ELIAS: I may express to you, in physical terms, yes, you are correct, although this is not the point.

I may express to you, you are correct that this is a mass expression which is being created in that physical location. I may also express to you that this is another movement of this shift in consciousness in emergence into an awareness concerning energy.

And in this, the challenge is the recognition that energy is not limited and that there is no limit of supply, so to speak, individually or en masse. It matters not that it be expressed in actual physical exhibitions of power that you identify in terms of electricity or fuel or any type of action to be producing those elements within your reality that you perceive that you need, and it matters not that it be an individual expression of energy and the limitations of one individualís energy in physical, emotional, intellectual expressions. These are the outward expressions of imagery.

The point of this movement is an emergence into a recognition in reality that energy is movement, and there is no supply of movement. It is a natural expression of consciousness and therefore is infinite, and the manners in which you physically express that may be created in myriads of manners; it matters not. The recognition of the unlimitedness of energy is what holds significance, and I may express to you also that you are correct that there is great influence of this wave in consciousness addressing to duplicity which is being expressed in this challenge also.

HOWARD: Yes. Itís very obvious; yeah, itís quite obvious.

ELIAS: In the movement of this shift now, as you have moved into your new millennium and you are inserting this shift in consciousness into your objective reality, you are also experiencing a time framework which appears to be expressed in extremes. This in actuality is temporary, but in the design of your physical dimension, it also, in a manner of speaking, follows your creation or your expectation of what accompanies emergence.

This is not an absolute, and may be expressed as an unnecessary expression, but it matters not. It is the familiar movement of your physical dimension, that as some new manifestation shall be emerging, there is an expectation that that emergence shall be accompanied by trauma of some type, and much of the expression of trauma now is being created in extremes.

HOWARD: Yes, okay. I need to get into some of these TFEs (1) that Iíve been through for the last four years, maybe ten.

There are several images in the TFEs that have haunted me. One is of an Indian that seems to be a scout for the British and the Americans in the Revolutionary War or the War of 1812 or maybe the French and Indian War previous to that. Itís not clear. He was a double agent, so to speak, and he tried to get both sides to kill each other and appeared to be very successful at what he was doing.

One image that I have was of him moving back and forth between the lines of engagement, misdirecting the opposing forces in such a manner that they seemed to have backed into each other during a mutual retreat, which resulted in both forces receiving nearly 100 percent casualty losses. I canít put a tribe to his face, like maybe all of his people were dead. But I do recall the ending of his life. It seemed he died alone; it was in a swamp or river. And I wrote down here ... I was wondering what battle that was that I saw where this carnage occurred, and the name that came to me was the name of Cucamonga. Then I wondered who was this person that I was viewing, and what was his name and what tribe was he from?

ELIAS: And what is your impression?

HOWARD: My impression is ... oh, I had many: the Ohio Valley, like Mohican, and other times, itís Piute. Itís very confusing, and since I donít know that much about the eastern tribes ... Iím sorry, I donít know.

ELIAS: And in this, what is your impression concerning this individual?

HOWARD: Just now, a name like John Payne came to mind Ė a half-breed.

ELIAS: And do you view this individual to be a focus of your essence?

HOWARD: Yes.

ELIAS: You are correct. In this, I may also validate to you that this individual is what you in physical terms express as of mixed lineage.

HOWARD: Okay.

ELIAS: I may also express to you that your identification of the actions of this individual are also correct, and that the disengagement of this individual was Ė is Ė near a river. Therefore, I shall validate your viewing of this also. And I may offer to you one more validation as to the identification of the tribe, so to speak, or family that this individual participated with, and that is of what you term to be the Mohican tribe.

HOWARD: Iíll be damned!

ELIAS: And in this, if you are so choosing, you may continue to be allowing yourself an exploration, or you may merely validate yourself that you have allowed yourself to accurately view another focus of your essence.

HOWARD: I guess this would be the French and Indian War, and the battle was Cucamonga.

ELIAS: And shall you acknowledge yourself?

HOWARD: Yes.

ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha!

HOWARD: Okay. Next is the association that I had with Ė a rather vivid thing, also Native American Ė another image associated with a Little Death Ceremony that Margot and I had with Jade.

This image involved myself with many women. I assumed I was a man, and the only man; thatís the feeling I have. I also assumed that I was an Indian, but I could have been a trapper. I was well armed, I had a rifle and a hatchet and several knives, and I wore a heavy bearskin coat. And I was appalled and shocked at what appeared to be a massacre occurring before my eyes. There was a great sense of urgency of the women to get to a place of safety. These women, all dressed in buckskin, white buckskin, were coming down out of a deeply forested canyon onto a beach. There was a river running through this place.

I was out on the water in a canoe, and they seemed to have no place to escape to. Someone was pursuing them; Iím not sure who. This small beach was on a river, as I said. The women were stacking up at the riverside. They were young and old and seemed to be in a panic. The escape from the beach was by way of the river, and apparently most could not swim, or didnít or werenít able to by injury, so I was trying to transport them across the water.

My feelings of this whole thing, which just greatly affected me, were that I could not save them all. As I took what appeared to be the old Ė which was a full boatload across the river in the direction of safety Ė I returned to find the remaining women being ... they were slaughtered.

This is somewhere in the northwest, maybe even into Canada. The place reminds me ... when I see it, I am reminded of Big Hole, Montana, where Chief Joseph and his people were attacked and were affected there badly. I get a connection between the two, and I would like to know why I had this deep sense of guilt and responsibility for the women. Also Iíd like to know what it might have been about. Who was I, and who were these women?

ELIAS: I may express to you, you do hold a focus that participates in this action, and is what you term to be Native American. In this, you are also correct in your identification of western location, although you may adjust your identification of that to be what is known to you as California.

HOWARD: Oh!

ELIAS: In this, you draw to yourself the imagery of that particular focus in recognition of the similarity of the extreme expression of personal responsibility that that individual expressed within that focus concerning what you may associate as family and friends.

In this, you also in THIS focus create a similar type of association in the expression of personal responsibility to other individuals. That individual incorporated an expression of guilt in their lack of ability to be altering other individualsí realities, and you in this focus incorporate a very similar expression.

This is the reason that you draw the energy and expression of that focus to you in this focus, to allow yourself a clearer identification of what you create now.

HOWARD: Yep! Boy, boy!

ELIAS: This also moves in conjunction with your previous explanation of experience in relation to your friend and your expression of emotion that you experience now.

HOWARD: Oh! Yes, yes. What goes around comes around!

ELIAS: No!

HOWARD: (Laughing) No?

ELIAS: No, my friend! This is not cause and effect, and it is not karma!

Let me express to you, you are merely presenting yourself with information to more clearly identify what you are associating with in this present time framework, and as I have offered to you, this is an opportunity for you to become more familiar with your own expressions and what you create, and therefore allow yourself to be opening to more of your choices and your recognition of reality as it is expressed Ė not to be discounting of yourself.

And I shall reiterate to you that if and when you are so choosing for the incorporation of more information, I shall be compliant in offering this to you. I merely withhold presently in recognition that you are creating a barrier presently and wish not to be exploring this information yet.

HOWARD: Okay. All right, I accept that.

ELIAS: And in not being intrusive to your focus and your direction, I express to you the choice that futurely you may recognize that I am always available to you.

HOWARD: All right; so accepted. I have noticed something in some of the focuses that I have ... no, Iíll do this later.

I would like to introduce this: the chapter focus that we participated in in Scotland. To me Ė and Margotís talked about this in the last session, so itís kind of a follow-up Ė to me, it seems to be Middle Ages, British Island, that is to say somewhere between 800 AD and 1300 AD, which is a big time, 500 years.

When Iím listening to Miles Davisí ďSketches of Spain,Ē there is a particular tune in there which I had associated with El Cid. When I was listening to it recently, I decided that it was almost like a eulogy or a lament for a gypsy, a Basque, a very powerful individual, magician, sorcerer, who left the country probably due to the Spanish Inquisition that was occurring or was fomenting. This individual moved and settled in northern Scotland. His Spanish name was Ė and this is all impression Ė his Spanish name was Algernon, and he went by the name of Algernon or Aldebaran, like the star. Thatís the name of the individual who brought this magic Ė probably out of the East Ė but brought it nevertheless. He was a Celtic individual, and it was about 800 AD. Am I correct in this?

ELIAS: I shall express to you, your impression as to the relocation of an individual to Scotland is correct. I may express to you also the initial naming of the individual is also correct. I may express to you, the cultural or ethnic identification of this individual is not Spanish. This individual is Moorish.

HOWARD: Of course!

ELIAS: I may also express to you that your time framework, late 800s, is also correct. I may also express to you that this particular individual that you may identify as a sorcerer is not in actuality participating in the chapter focus that you are identifying. That particular focus is expressed within a different time framework.

HOWARD: Okay. My, my!

ELIAS: But you may continue your investigation, for I may also validate to you that your impression of this chapter focus being within that particular 500 years is also correct.

HOWARD: Okay. My, my, how interesting!

ELIAS: (Chuckling) Much to be investigating, my friend!

HOWARD: Oh my, yes!

ELIAS: HA HA! Therefore you shall continue to be quite busy!

HOWARD: Yes. (Elias laughs) Well, I have one more rather long thing to say if we have time; if we donít, we can do it again, although I would like to get it out if we could.

ELIAS: Very well!

HOWARD: As you recall, there was some discussion in our last visit at Ronís and Vicís regarding the lost chapter focus, and Margot has expressed to you that she came to grips or saw something with the Greeks. And I, too, had a Greek experience, but whether or not it was a chapter or just simply my own ... actually, I think it was a chapter also Ė Iíll stop weaseling Ė it was around the time of the so-called Golden Age of Greece, and I seemed to be a member or a participant in a group of the stoics, and we were discussing a great deal about the concept of one god, which was coming at us from Mesopotamia and the East. The time frame would be 600 BC, I guess; it could be as late as 1000 BC.

And I got this name: Minos, M-I-N-O-S, and I couldnít decide whether that was a place, an island, or an individual. Also, I made a great leap that this was also Minoan in culture ... and the Valley of the Kings in Cyprus, a very unusual archeological site which Iíve been to and seen. No one knows where that came from, symbols chiseled in the rock ... itís all very mysterious and quite wonderful in its grandeur.

And so I said to myself, well, this sounds like something that we would be doing, investigating concepts of god-ness, from the pantheon to a singularity. Is that correct, or...?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

HOWARD: Okay. The time frame would be around 800 BC? (Pause)

ELIAS: Your initial impression is closer.

HOWARD: All right. Which brings me then to both Cyprus and Corfu. When I saw Corfu, it was like, wow! I am home! And I had the same impression in Saudi Arabia in a town called Hofuf, and on the other coast, on the west coast, is Yanbu.

Now Iím going to a specific time and place. Yanbu is on the edge of a large desert that stretches probably 70 or 80 miles to the north. Itís five or six miles wide, and thereís a range of mountains there.

When I first got there, I said, ďWhoa! I have been here before!Ē And I looked up at this one peak which was discernable above the others, about 4000 feet high, or 3000 or so. I said, ďThat is the mountain where Moses got the tablets! Thatís the mountain! And this Ė Iím standing on it right here Ė is the wilderness of sin, on the flinty plain.Ē And without trying, I got myself caught up in Muslim lore with the escape of Mohammed being chased out of Medina, and his little cave where the spider made his web in front of the opening to proclaim to any visitor who would be on the outside that no one had passed through here and that the cave was not occupied. And I could remember sitting inside looking out, watching this spider make this web.

I donít know if that would ... the prose thatís written in the Koran about this is very powerful and can create images that I truly believe that I was there, so much so that I have stated to Margot and others that Iíve seen the mountain and walked on the plain. I know where the cave is. I realize that this is a bleed-through of many focuses perhaps, but many experiences at the same time.

Thatís why I might say that I really like the Arab people, and I have a lot of empathy for the Jewish problem. I feel that the Kabah there in Mecca, where Abraham was reported to have put Isaac on there and was about to take his life, that the Kabah itself is a very powerful symbol to the unity between the Muslims and the Israelis, and that in time perhaps this holy place will be opened up to them, or at least the symbol thatís there will help them heal their wounds.

Those are my thoughts on that, and I guess Iím looking for validation about my impression.

ELIAS: And I shall be validating of your impression concerning your experience and the expression of this and other focuses in that time framework and in that location. You are correct.

HOWARD: Okay. All right! (Elias chuckles) Thank you.

ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend.

HOWARD: Thatís pretty much it!

ELIAS: Very well. (Smiles)

HOWARD: Thank you. Thank you for being there!

ELIAS: Accept from myself an expression of energy in encouragement to you, and also, in an expression of essence, of compassion offered to you in this time framework.

I anticipate our continued interaction. I shall be expressing my energy with you in this interim time framework, and anticipate our next meeting.

HOWARD: All right.

ELIAS: I offer to you a tremendous expression of affection.

HOWARD: Masalamah. Thank you so much.

ELIAS: To you, my friend, au revoir.

HOWARD: Good-bye.

Elias departs at 2:52 PM.


Endnotes:

(1) TFE – Transfocal Encounter; viewing other focuses while in an altered state. Sometimes referred to as ďpast life regression,Ē but within the concept of simultaneous time, all focuses occur simultaneously, and there is no ďpast.Ē

Digests: find out more about trans-focal encounters.


< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >


© 2001 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.