Friday, March 30, 2001
“Color Vibration in Interaction with Another Individual”
“Holding Your Attention Upon Yourself in the Now”
Participants: Mary (Michael), Gail (William), and Jeremy (Opan).
Elias arrives at 1:28 PM. (Arrival time is 17 seconds.)
ELIAS: Good morning!
JEREMY: Good morning!
GAIL: Good morning, Elias!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) How shall we proceed?
GAIL: Well, we have a bunch of little questions to ask, but then I don’t know where it’s going to go from there! We’ll play it by ear.
ELIAS: Very well!
GAIL: There’s one question that both Jeremy and I are interested in finding out the answer to. We’ve been viewing shafts of light that come into our awareness together, and this last one was a bigger, with color emanating from it. My understanding of the color was like a peach, kind of a yellow and an orange together. Jeremy saw the same thing, and he described it a little bit different but very similar. We were wondering what that is, and why we create that together.
JEREMY: The majority of the color is white, but we get the underlying colors behind it. I liken it to my experience of whiting out, but on a smaller scale.
ELIAS: Now; offer to myself your impression of what you are creating.
GAIL: Go for it, Jeremy! (Laughs)
JEREMY: I think we’re basically creating, as we’re interacting – because it normally happens when we’re in communication, talking about certain experiences and things like that – that it’s our allowance, briefly within the moment, of other types of interaction with each other.
ELIAS: Essentially, your interpretation is correct. I may express to you, what you are allowing yourselves to view in relation to this color is a physical display of the energy exchange. As you are aware, you incorporate energy centers and an energy field in relation to your individual selves, and in this, as you exchange energy with any other individual, what you in actuality create is a mixing or a merging of energies as they contact each other.
In physical terms, each individual projects a particular vibration or tone of energy in relation to their interaction with the other individual, and as these two energies merge and intermix together, at times you may allow yourself to actually physically view the energy expression itself, and it may manifest itself in an actual physical color tone within your dimension. In this, you may also allow yourselves to recognize the color tone that you each are projecting within the moment, and how that merges together to create a combined color tone which translates into another color.
GAIL: So, was I projecting yellow and Jeremy projecting orange, and that’s where we got peach?
JEREMY: And the white was the incorporation of all the colors, and that’s why I was getting some colors behind the white, because that was the specifics of the energy?
GAIL: Oh, that’s kind of fun!
JEREMY: I remember several dream encounters with you, Elias, where you were doing something similar with a blue energy, but it was more, as I translate it, crystal-like.
ELIAS: I am understanding. This is merely an expression which is offered in more of clarity.
You may be accomplishing this action physically also, and you may allow yourselves to view this same type of expression, if you are so choosing, and if you are practicing allowing yourself to view these vibrational exchanges of energy which create actual color tones; and as you create more of a clarity of your viewing and a clearer recognition of your own energy expression and an openness in clarity to the other individual’s projection of energy, in your terms the expression of color does become more crystallized, so to speak.
GAIL: Is there something that we can do with this energy expression? Together, us together, can we do something with it?
JEREMY: More of manipulating than recognizing.
ELIAS: I may express to you that in actuality the point of allowing yourselves to be observing this type of interaction is to be offering yourselves a clearer recognition of the movement of energy in relation to interactions between two or more individuals objectively. For, this is not an expression in which you may be incorporating an action of manipulating that energy tone, so to speak, in...
JEREMY: So, I guess that’s almost what you would term a by-product of the exchange that’s happening in which we are manipulating, which is the interaction?
ELIAS: Yes. Now; this may be significant in relation to the information that I have offered previously concerning what is actually occurring in the interaction between two or more individuals physically. For as I have stated, what you directly interact with in physical terms of matter is your own projection of the other individual, which is manufactured through your perception; but you DO interact with the energy expression of the other individual directly.
In a manner of speaking, the movement of the energy in interactions between individuals may be likened to a direction of a horseshoe, so to speak. For, one individual creates an expression which automatically projects outwardly energy. This energy, as I have stated previously, is not necessarily in actuality directed to any one individual. It is merely a projection outwardly of the individual as they create any expression...
JEREMY: So, this is like an element of allowing awareness of how we create our reality, in allowing an awareness of our interaction with each other – in like manner to our constant interaction with every individual – drawing from their blueprint to be creating the personality that we incorporate within the physical, manifesting projections within our reality.
ELIAS: Yes. For as the projection of energy is expressed by one individual, it is received by any or all individuals that may be physically interactive or within physical proximity to that individual. Once received, it is filtered through the associations of the individual that has received that energy projection, and subsequently it is turned, projected once again outward in the manifestation of the receiving individual’s perception.
JEREMY: The way I’ve been expressing it is, I’ve been creating a difference between projection and what I term a type of radiation, which is to me moving more in effortless terms, like expressing yourself within being. You are just radiating, because of your perception and things, and that’s creating of your reality. So, would it be kind of like that? Each individual’s radiating their own reality, and the other person in communication or interaction with them is picking up subjectively on that and incorporating that within their own quote/unquote “radiation”?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes, for you are receiving the projection of energy which is automatically expressed. There is no effort which is incorporated in this action. It is an automatic expression in relation to ANY movement and choice and creation of any individual within your physical dimension.
What holds significance, as I have stated previously, is your reception of that energy expression, and HOW you incorporate that and project that energy outwardly again through the mechanism of your perception, and what you allow to influence in relation to your perception as you project the energy once again outwardly, and therefore create the solidity of your reality.
Now; in the experience that you have offered in relation to the recognition of color vibration in exchange with another individual, [this] allows you to view the energy projection; and as you view the energy projection and you receive the energy projection, this may offer you a different direction of information in HOW you receive that energy, and how you filter that energy through your associations and beliefs, and reconfigure that energy as you project it outwardly once again through your individual perception.
GAIL: Wow. (Laughs) And speaking of “wows,” we’ve been having a lot of “wows!” (Elias laughs)
My “wow” came from the imagery of realizing ... or in analogy, that I’m a grain of sand, but I’m also the beach and I’m also the ocean, and I couldn’t even go further than that because that was just so “wow” as it was!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha! I may express to you, within this time framework many, many individuals are allowing themselves more of a real identification of themselves as essence, and the expansiveness and the diversity and creativity of that expression as essence.
For you have allowed yourselves an assimilation of information which is, in this time framework, greatly influencing of your allowance of yourselves now to be objectively incorporating that information in the expression of a genuine recognition – or a beginning of the recognition – of yourselves as you are expressed in being, as an element of consciousness and as essence, rather than merely your identification of a focus of essence.
GAIL: Yes, and to tell the truth, pretty “wow!” I mean, I just keep on going wow! (Laughing, and Elias laughs) Is that why both Jeremy and I have been creating pressure in our sinus areas? Is that part of it?
ELIAS: Partially. This is influenced by beliefs that you incorporate in relation to a resistance to this expansiveness.
GAIL: Yes, that’s what I thought. I also have a question about the little girl, Brook, that I came in contact with last weekend, of us creating together an exchange of imagery from myself, of her being three and me being aware that she’s not completely hearing herself in order to communicate. And I’m wondering – I mean, I know I drew that experience to myself – if also part of this is listening to myself and hearing myself of the vastness of myself?
ELIAS: Yes, and also in the expression of recognizing your own communications to yourself in the now.
I may express to you both, in similarity to what I have offered to Yarr, within this present time framework another action which is being created by individuals – both of you, also – quite frequently is a movement of holding your attention in the now but projecting your attention outside of yourself, or holding your attention within self but not within the now.
GAIL: I think I’ve actually felt that struggle with myself, to pull myself into the now but not really feeling it, being distracted by outside.
ELIAS: Correct. This is an action which is being created within many individuals’ experiences in relation to the wave in consciousness addressing to duplicity, in which you create an awareness of holding your attention within the now, in your terms, allowing yourself to be present within the now, but in that presence you project your attention outside of yourself, outwardly.
GAIL: So how do I pull my attention inwardly?
ELIAS: Ah, but you do create this action also. You create...
GAIL: I also realize that it’s at two separate times, but how do I make it coincide, to make it like unison?
ELIAS: Correct; and in this, as you allow yourself to be noticing within either of these expressions of holding your attention upon yourself but not within the now, or holding your attention within the now but projecting it outwardly – in either of these situations – as you allow yourself to be noticing, you may move your attention into a harmony and a balance, and adjust, so to speak, the aspect of your attention which is not in balance with these two factors, so to speak.
JEREMY: As an example of that, in my situation, would this be in those instances where I’m interacting with individuals and I’m allowing myself, within that now, to be recognizing more of a depth to the interactions, in that I’m recognizing why I’m creating that situation and also my beliefs and perception, and projecting outwardly a slight distinction from what they’re creating and why they’re creating it and their beliefs and perception as interactive, and also like a ... well, just the difference between me creating my reality and them creating their reality?
ELIAS: You may incorporate an example such as this as you have offered, in recognizing the moments in which your attention is being held in the now, but it is fluctuating between yourself and concerning yourself with the expression and beliefs and motivations of the other individual. As you move your attention to the expressions and choices and beliefs of the other individual, your attention has been moved outside of yourself.
JEREMY: I thought I was mainly engaging the action of noticing in my exploration of my issues, where the majority of that lies. Previously I would allow myself, within personal responsibility and stuff, to get caught up in the other individual, not recognizing that they may be creating their own situation and issues – which I’m creating within my reality, but not necessarily directly with that issue – but to be noticing other things within that issue, and so I would allow that influence, thinking ... and then I would take on that issue myself, kind of.
ELIAS: I am understanding of what you are expressing, Opan. And what I am expressing to you is in many situations in interaction with other individuals, many of you – yourself, also – have incorporated enough information to this time framework in which you have allowed yourself an adequate enough assimilation of the information that you do allow yourselves to be interactive with another individual and allow yourselves to recognize the reflection that other individuals offer to you in relation to yourselves and what you are creating.
BUT you also continue to create a familiar action – which is what we are addressing to presently – in which the viewing of the other individual’s expression is partially being accepted as a reflection of you, but it is also partially being viewed in an expression of energy outside of yourself, in which you are in actuality concerning yourself with the actions, behaviors, choices, expressions of the other individual and the beliefs that the other individual is incorporating; and this action is so familiar to you that you do not notice that you are projecting your attention outside of yourself.
JEREMY: Is that like a more subtle form of personal responsibility?
ELIAS: No. This is not an action of incorporating personal responsibility for the other individual.
JEREMY: Okay, so this is ... okay, I’m seeing the difference now. This is more of a noticing within that projecting outside of ourselves, so to speak, rather than actually taking responsibility for their choices, behaviors, and all that stuff that we are noticing.
ELIAS: Correct. It is the opportunity for you to be noticing the direction of your attention, for this is tremendously influencing of your perception and of your expressions.
JEREMY: So, giving you an example of a certain individual – who I’m not going to name (laughs) – the reflection in a previous interaction I created would move in the area of a worry. But where I take it in a projection outside of myself is when I attempt to be understanding why THEY are creating that type of worry and the beliefs involved and that sort of thing, instead of holding my attention on the areas where I’m creating it and why I’m creating that.
ELIAS: Correct. Yes, you are correct.
Now; I may also express to you that as you are aware, and as you have already stated, other individuals do reflect to you what you are creating, but their reflection may be expressed in different types of objective imagery than you may necessarily create.
JEREMY: Like if somebody has an issue with money, if you don’t particularly in your creating situation, then within talking about that it’s not necessarily that you are holding an issue with money, but you’re holding the underlying issue with the whole money thing, that money is the expression of that issue.
ELIAS: In this example, the creation of the money or the lack of creation of the money or the interaction with money or the expression of money is not the subject. The money itself is the subject.
JEREMY: Right, I was likening that to the expression of the issue that you are reflecting.
ELIAS: Correct. Now; in this, also let me express to you quite genuinely, there are many interactions that you create with other individuals that may not necessarily be expressive of a reflection of an issue. You may be drawing to yourself and presenting to yourself a reflection of the other individual to yourself in a particular expression of the other individual, concerning their choices and their creation of their reality, that you may allow yourself to view the similarities in the differences. Are you understanding?
GAIL: I think so.
ELIAS: For as you offer to yourself these types of reflections and these types of experiences in interaction with other individual[s], you offer yourself an expression of reinforcement of fellow travelers, and not learners and teachers; and you offer yourself the opportunity to be expressing a genuine projection of yourself in understanding, recognition and compassion – not in the expression of compassion that you define within your physical vocabulary and its identification of this word, but in a genuine expression of compassion within essence, which ultimately creates a genuine expression of appreciation. It creates an expression of appreciation of yourself and of the other individual.
GAIL: I have a question for Danny. He has been creating the bottom of his feet hurting. His impression of that is that he’s ready to make movement, but within his creation at this point, he isn’t making the movement; so, in that, he’s creating the bottom of his feet hurting. Is this correct?
ELIAS: Yes, this is correct, and you may also offer to this individual, there is an incorporation of fear associated with the movement.
GAIL: Yes, we’ve talked about that. He verbalizes that, that he’s afraid.
GAIL: I have one other question that I’ve been thinking about for a while and wanting to ask (laughing), which is kind of silly in my perception, but other people bring up the topic as well and even in imagery on my computer. I would like to know, what is the meaning of the expression we create of passing gas? (Jeremy cracks up in the background)
ELIAS: (Chuckling) I may express to you, you hold many beliefs within your physical dimension in relation to this action that you create. You incorporate associations with what you consume. You create associations with the function of your physical body consciousness and with particular organs. I may express to you, in actuality this action is associated with a momentary expression of a burst in release of energy which is being held in tension.
JEREMY: Release, that’s what I was going to move in the direction of thinking and associating with that!
ELIAS: I may express to you that this action that is created, within individuals and also creatures, is quite similar to the action which is incorporated within your actual planet, your earth, and the release of energy which is expressed in what you identify as geysers.
GAIL: Oh, I was going to say earthquakes! (Laughing)
ELIAS: This is a different expression.
GAIL: Yes, I see.
ELIAS: They are merely bursts of energy which are expressed in a release of tension which has been incorporated within the physical manifestation, be it within your earth, be it within a creature or within yourselves, and you merely associate this action with many different expressions in relation to your beliefs.
JEREMY: Well, it’s interesting because whenever I’m moving through an issue I create imagery of diarrhea, and with that comes an intense amount of gas which I have to let out also. (Laughs)
ELIAS: I am understanding. I may express to you that you may be noticing that this action of these bursts of energy expression are occurring in time frameworks in which you may be recognizing that your physical body consciousness is holding an expression of tension.
GAIL: That’s kind of interesting after what Vicki was saying, that she does it just at work. (Laughing) That’s kind of funny!
JEREMY: I’ve got a couple questions. I got the impression, after a brief appearance of a focus of mine that was from Japan, that his name is Himato Hiroshi. Is that correct? (Pause)
ELIAS: Himato Kobashi.
JEREMY: Kobashi, okay. I knew that there was a translation of that last name! Also, the future focus Mikah has been connecting with presently, is his name Merrilan or Merrilin?
ELIAS: Future focus, incorporating name Merlin.
JEREMY: Okay, that’s what Mike got. He thought it was either Merlin or a variation of Merlin. So, was he one of THE Merlins, or just a different individual with the name of Merlin?
ELIAS: The individual merely incorporates this physical naming. It is not a title.
JEREMY: Okay. In the investigation you and Mike have been discussing involving the Monets, he was wondering if he was Jean Monet. (Pause)
ELIAS: As the son, correct.
JEREMY: Okay, that’s cool. (Pause)
GAIL: Well, I think it’s probably time for us to go. I know Mary has a car to dig out of the snow and an appointment. (Elias laughs) So, I think that’s it for now. (Laughs)
ELIAS: Very well. I shall be offering encouragement to you both as you continue to be allowing yourselves to view these energy exchanges.
JEREMY: Oh, Mikah and I are parallel counterparts, correct?
ELIAS: You do incorporate counterpart action, but not in parallel.
GAIL: Okay! (Elias chuckles)
ELIAS: To you both in tremendous encouragement, I anticipate our next meeting and our further discussions of your adventures in what you are exploring.
GAIL: We’re having fun together, I’ll tell you that! (Elias laughs)
JEREMY: Very soon, our next interaction.
ELIAS: I am greatly acknowledging of you both, and express tremendous affection to each of you. To you this day, my friends, I express a loving au revoir.
GAIL: Bye. That was fun!
Elias departs at 2:10 PM.
© 2001 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.