Elias Transcripts – Session 996, Saturday, January 26, 2002

KEVIN: My impression is Milumet ... Milumet (changing pronunciations). I don’t know how that’s pronounced. The name escapes me of the other family – the organizers – is my other one. My orientation, my guess is intermediate. I don’t know if it’s a guess or an impression.

ELIAS: I may express to you, alignment Milumet, essence family Sumafi, and you are correct in your impression concerning your orientation of intermediate.

KEVIN: Good, because I would have had a lot of questions if it wasn’t.

ELIAS: As to essence name (pause), Jashue, J-A-S-H-U-E (jah SHOO).

KEVIN: Thank you!

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

KEVIN: I guess the major issue I want to talk about today is my feeling that in the past five years or so – and this relates to coming up to the shift – as I’ve pursued different ways of widening my consciousness, the message that has always been coming back to me is, “That’s not for you. That’s not what you need to do right now. That’s kind of there already, and you need to do more work in the physical realm, how to interact with people on the physical realm.” I just want to know if I have structured belief systems that are turning me the wrong way, or if I’m correct, or...?

ELIAS: I may express to you, my friend, you are quite correct; but I may also express to you the reason that you are offering this message to yourself is not that you are not widening your awareness, but that your association with widening your awareness moves with beliefs that this action is cosmic and not associated with the physical.

Now; let me express to you, in association with your alignment, in actuality this is quite commonly expressed by individuals that align with this family of Milumet, for there is within many of your societies rigid associations concerning spirituality and a definite separation in association with spirituality concerning physical and nonphysical. Those qualities or expressions that you deem to be pertaining to nonphysical are defined as spiritual, and those expressions that are associated with the physical are defined as non-spiritual.

In association with this particular essence family which expresses qualities concerning spirituality – but in ACTUAL expressions of spirituality – many times individuals incorporate a misunderstanding, for there is a strong association with religious beliefs, not necessarily in association with particular establishments of religion, but you all incorporate religious beliefs and in this there is a reinforcement of this separation between physical and nonphysical expressions.

Widening your awareness encompasses all of your expressions, and as you are physically manifest within this physical dimension there is a tremendous expression of paying attention and widening your awareness concerning what you physically manifest and how you interact with yourself, with other individuals and with your world, and allowing yourself a recognition of how your expression of consciousness in physical expressions, physical actions, generates a rippling effect within consciousness. It also allows you to familiarize yourself with you, therefore allowing you the ability to objectively, intentionally direct and choose in relation to your direction expressions that you want to generate and interactions that you want to participate within. This action IS widening your awareness concerning what you have chosen, to be physically manifest in exploration of consciousness, of yourself in a physical expression, and in this, you generate less separation, which is the point.

Therefore, in your terms, you are not off the track and you are not misconstruing or misunderstanding. But in allowing yourself to pay attention and to move your attention into a noticing and familiarization of what you generate physically, your message that you have presented to yourself is quite accurate: not to be concerning yourself with the cosmos for you ARE the cosmos. (Chuckles)

KEVIN: Right. I didn’t think I was off the track, but I didn’t see that connection between the physical and the spiritual as much. So that’s good.

The other major thing I want to talk about is my ... lots of my issues have dealt with feminine/masculine. I went through basically a period where I didn’t feel like I was doing anything, and then with the birth of my daughter, I awoke my feminine and I discovered that in myself. That was sixteen years ago. Three years ago with the birth of my son, it was as though my masculine was awakened. I don’t know if there is something you want to say to that, or can I actually ask a question about...?

ELIAS: Continue with your question.

KEVIN: The specific question is I have a very strong connection to the “Beauty and the Beast” story, and I was wondering where that fits into this, into my life.

ELIAS: Express to myself first of all, what is your assessment of this expression of movement in recognition of the feminine and the masculine, and what is the nature of your concern in relation to these expressions?

KEVIN: Firstly, my impression was that I grew up not really recognizing myself, not recognizing the feminine within me. Because of that, or in response to that, I didn’t interact with the world much. When I started to recognize that and accept that about myself, the feminine part of me, it was just good. It brought me into myself and brought to me where I all of a sudden decided or felt that my life was what it should be. As that kind of phase concluded, I felt as though, okay, now I know who I am and I’ll go on the rest of my life kind of being this.

ELIAS: Define feminine, in YOUR definition.

KEVIN: Feminine is more intuitive, more gentle, and I guess that’s how I was defining it, especially back then. There was a feeling of not wanting to do harm that I saw my male playmates wanting to do. But it’s more creative, more spiritual.

ELIAS: Define your recognition of your outward projection.

KEVIN: Now?

ELIAS: Of that feminine.

KEVIN: Well, until the last five years the outward projection was in being very gentle and very kind, but also that was kind of mixed with being very shy and very quiet. In the last five years, as my masculine has come more into play, the kindness, the gentleness is still there, but the interaction with other people has increased.

ELIAS: Now; within your expression of energy I am recognizing a concern in relation to the masculine expression. And shall you define that?

KEVIN: I definitely had negative connotations of the masculine expression, and I think that’s part of Beauty and the Beast, the Beast being the masculine. I saw the masculine as the part that does harm, the part that wields power incorrectly. I’m not sure I completely believe that anymore, but that’s certainly where I’ve been coming from.

ELIAS: Very well. Therefore you are expressing to myself that the nature of your concern is associated with your definitions of gender, for the expressions of masculine and feminine are the expressions of gender. In this, your definitions are being questioned, which I may express to you is also an aspect of the movement of this shift. As I have stated many times, you are redefining your terms and therefore also redefining all of your reality, and in that redefinition you are genuinely altering your physical reality in many, many manners.

Now; throughout your history and in association with beliefs, you have all generated beliefs concerning gender, and as sexuality is a base element in this physical dimension – one of the two base elements of this physical dimension – gender is a significant design. You have created a design in this dimension which incorporates a separation of two specific expressions, one male and one female. You design your physical forms in association with these genders, and you attribute gender to all that you generate within this dimension, for this is a base element of the design of this particular dimension.

You attribute qualities to male and female. Physical manifestations are associated with gender, even vegetation or structures, water, mountains, elements. You attribute masculine and feminine to all aspects of your reality. Your entire universe that you generate incorporates these qualities.

Now; you also generate beliefs in association with these genders.

Now; let me express to you first of all, gender is gender. Gender is an expression of difference in function.

Now; I may express to you that in your association, in actuality with how you configure energy within this physical dimension, there is an expression of male energy and female energy. But neither is more passive or more aggressive than the other; neither is gentler or stronger than the other. The expressions of difference of energy which you configure in association with gender are associated with the design of your physical dimension.

Now; as I have expressed, sexuality is one base element of your physical dimension. The other is emotion. Sexuality is not sexual activity. Sexuality is all that you generate physically, the physical expression of manifestation in any form, which is also associated with the masculine gender. The masculine gender is the intellectual, which is an aspect of the design of this physical dimension.

Emotion is communication. The communication is an inward generating of energy; the physical is the outward. They move in harmony. They both are expressions of the whole, and therefore they are both spiritual.

But emotion is communication, and in the expression of energy and how you configure it in relation to this dimension and its design, it is designated as the female, the feminine, and is the association of intuition. In your physical terms, intuition is no softer than intellect. They are different expressions which move together in balance.

Now; throughout your history in this dimension to this point, you have collectively, and of course individually, explored the masculine expression of energy, the male gender, the expression of intellect and the outward expression of manifestation – exploring your reality outwardly. This shift in consciousness is a Source Event which is turning the energy expression in your physical dimension, and in that, as I have stated, you are altering the physical expression within the design of your dimension.

Now; in this, you are turning the expression of the masculine to the expression of the feminine to allow you to explore your physical reality in a different manner: inwardly – what you may generate in actual ability of yourself and directing yourself – [which] continues to manifest outwardly but the perception is turned. The perception is turning to no longer concern itself with the generation of outward manifestation but the recognition of genuine ability and your movement and how you manipulate energy.

Now; in this, as you have associated specific qualities or expressions with the masculine and the feminine and you generate judgments that one is better than the other, that one is gentle and one is harsh – and in your beliefs, gentle is good and harsh is bad, therefore there are judgments that are being expressed – as you create these associations in relation to your beliefs, you allow yourself to recognize an expression of masculine and you generate a response to this that this is not good, but also in association with an underlying recognition that the movement of this shift is moving into an expression of the female gender, not to eliminate the male, but to be turning the attention to the female, which you have allowed yourself in extended time framework. But within this shift, although you are moving the energy into an expression of the female gender in association with its configuration, intuitive and self, this is not to say that you are denying the expression of the male or to be generating a judgment concerning the male, but recognizing the movement into balance.

Perhaps futurely, once you have allowed yourselves to explore the inward expression, the intuitive and female expression, in equal capacity to what you have allowed yourselves to generate exploring the male, you may choose in this physical dimension to eliminate gender entirely. But within this time framework, this is not what you are generating. You are continuing in the design of this physical dimension for it is efficient, and in that you are merely turning your perceptions.

Recognize that the male is not necessarily what you define as aggressive, for your definition of aggressive also incorporates associations with negative. In this, the male expression, as it is an outward expression, a manifesting expression in physical manifestations, is quite creative. It is highly motivated. This is what you view to be aggressive for it is naturally highly motivated, for as you project energy outwardly and you generate physical manifestation, you amaze yourselves in how you may be generating physical from nonphysical. But in that generation of physical, you also have moved your attention away from the source of you and of energy and how this is generated and how it is manipulated to generate outward physical manifestations and product, in any manner.

Therefore you have explored the physical manifestations, the male expression, to its fullest without the balance of the feminine. Now you move to explore your reality with the incorporation of the feminine but without the elimination of the male. It is merely a point, my friend, of redefining and recognizing that there is no threat. What you view in physical behaviors that you associate with male and female genders are highly influenced by beliefs.

KEVIN: And in that, are you saying that my beliefs are creating the circumstances that I view? So I view males, or have viewed males, in negative situations based on my beliefs creating those situations?

ELIAS: Correct. But view your story that you so strongly associate with in this “Beauty and the Beast,” and view the Beast. Does it not incorporate that gentle expression also?

KEVIN: Yes, right.

ELIAS: It merely appears larger and overshadowing, and Beauty appears smaller and less aggressive, so to speak. But view this story, for the Beauty, although smaller, is highly motivated and in actuality expresses quite an aggressiveness in generating what she wants. And which appears passive but the Beast? And what is the reason that the Beast appears passive, but in fear of itself and in questioning and doubting and discounting of itself? The aggressiveness of the female in your story is what generates the transformation of the Beast.

Therefore pay attention to your story that you associate with so strongly, for you are offering yourself messages concerning redefinition of your terms of the masculine and the feminine. The feminine expression of energy is not passive and its expression of gentleness is misinterpreted, for in actuality it is the incorporation of nurturing and appreciation that is expressed, and this may be expressed quite aggressively.

KEVIN: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome, my friend.

KEVIN: Before we run out of time, I would like to ask about some close relationships and their essence names and families. My wife, Lori? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Luna, L-U-N-A. And your impression?

KEVIN: I don’t remember the names so well. My impression is perhaps Ilda and I forget the ... I don’t know. She’s hard to read because she kind of keeps wraps on herself. Ilda, and the other one I’m forgetting right now. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence family, Sumafi – as are you – and alignment, correct, Ilda.

KEVIN: Orientation?

ELIAS: Common.

KEVIN: My daughter, Erin? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Allianne, A-L-L-I-A-N-N-E (ah lee AHN). Offer impression.

KEVIN: My impression of her is there’s some Milumet and some Sumari.

ELIAS: Correct.

KEVIN: I kind of had a feeling about that one. (Elias chuckles) And finally my son, Ender. Oh, Erin’s orientation?

ELIAS: Common.

KEVIN: How about Ender? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Shangshu, S-H-A-N-G-S-H-U (SHENG shoo).

KEVIN: My impression for him is some Ilda, family Ilda – could be alignment – and the other I’m not sure of at all.

ELIAS: Essence family, Gramada; alignment, Ilda; orientation, common.

KEVIN: Thank you. Okay!

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

KEVIN: I want to get this one question now, I think. One impression I had about a year ago is that there was a probability at that time of a third child, which I know my wife wants, and a further impression that that third child would only be coming if certain things happened in our lives, certain growth, I guess, for want of a better word, was accomplished. I guess the question is, is that a probability that still exists, or has that probability passed? (Pause)

ELIAS: It is a probability. I may express to you there is a willingness in association with an entering focus, but this also is dependent upon your agreements. The availability of the entering focus is expressed. Your choice is to be generating the agreement in allowance in facilitation of that action – not you singularly, you and your partner in the allowance of that expression to be facilitated.

Now; what you are generating is an expression of condition, not concerning the entering focus but concerning yourselves, and the reason that you are generating these conditions is in association with your movement in this shift in consciousness, which in recognition of your energy I am quite understanding, for you have already presented yourself with challenge concerning two focuses that you have facilitated in entrance into manifestation.

As this shift progresses and increases in its insertion and in its intensity, this generates more challenge. For, each new manifestation that is entering into your physical reality enters into the manifestation with a wider awareness, for they are entering into the physical manifestation in association with the movement of the shift. Therefore in your quite physical terms, each year that is incorporated moves the awareness of entering focuses in a wider expression and in this the objective is to be directing of self, which creates quite a challenge in association with beliefs concerning the roles of family and parents and children. For the children are being manifest knowing that they are directing of themselves, which appears to the parents within the beliefs as being rebellious or uncooperative and in this presents tremendous challenge, for these beliefs are quite strongly expressed in association with family roles and that the parents should be directing of the children, molding and leading and directing, and in this the children are recognizing that this is unnecessary. They KNOW they are creating their reality.

KEVIN: So as parents, we don’t need to worry too much about teaching them that?

ELIAS: Quite! They already incorporate an awareness and are offering themselves validation in information objectively to define this within themselves. They are recognizing of beliefs but in a different manner than yourselves, for they are more easily allowing themselves movement into acceptance of beliefs, knowing that they are an element of the design of this physical dimension and that they shall not be eliminated, but knowing that they incorporate choice, which is the point and which is what you are moving into.

Within any moment, my friend, as you look to yourself and you recognize the movement that you have incorporated and your assessment of your position in your awareness and what you have assimilated and what you recognize in information, you may assure yourself that the small ones already parallel you without books and without the physical incorporation of information that you offer to yourself. Any entering focus enters in the same movement as is being expressed en masse, and what you individually are expressing in your awareness in this moment is already being incorporated in parallel with entering focuses that incorporate no more than two weeks of age.

KEVIN: Let me just ask specifically about the connection, relationship, between my wife and our son, the three year old, because she is worried. She always worries that she is doing harm to him and is feeling a lot of stress about that, and so I’m wondering what is going on.

ELIAS: First of all, I shall express to you to direct your attention to you, for this generates an example which offers more information to your partner than any other expression, and also to yourself. I may also extend invitation, that if this individual is so choosing and wishing to be incorporating information herself in association with this situation, I shall be quite compliant in offering that information.

Let me express to you, my friend, I am understanding the nature of your concern, for you generate affection for both of these individuals; but I am also recognizing the automatic expression of attempting to fix as you incorporate information, which there is no expression to fix. If she is choosing to offer herself information in association with what motivates this discounting of herself, for this is what is being generated which generates the conflict, I shall be more than available.

KEVIN: Great! I’ll let her know.

ELIAS: Very well.

KEVIN: Well then, let’s move to the relationship between me and my daughter. I’ve always just had a feeling that there is a very ... I’ve felt there are parent/child relationships and then there are special parent/child relationships. There’s something extra there, and I guess I’m just asking for your comments on if that is so, or what that connection is.

ELIAS: Let me express to you that you incorporate many focuses with both of these individuals that you view to be children. You allow yourself different associations with each of them, partially in relation to your beliefs concerning gender and partially in allowance of yourself to be recognizing the familiarity of one, of the daughter, for the energy expression of the daughter is more pleasing to you.

KEVIN: Yeah, I got that right before you said it.

ELIAS: But you incorporate many relationships with both of these individuals, and in this it matters not, for they each also are generating certain types of expressions in relation to you and therefore projecting certain expressions of energy to you, which you are responsive or not responsive to in different manners. I may express to you, for the most part the most strongly expressed influence concerns your associations with your beliefs, not your connection, so to speak, with either of these individuals.

Acceptance is a wondrous expression, my friend, and in that acceptance, as you allow yourself to be accepting of you in all of your expressions and your awareness, you shall generate an automatic by-product in acceptance of other individuals.

KEVIN: All right. Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

KEVIN: I think we are out of time.

ELIAS: Very well.

KEVIN: I want to thank you very much for being available.

ELIAS: And so I shall be, my friend!

KEVIN: Thank you.

ELIAS: My invitation is extended to you also, and my availability is ongoing. I offer to you great encouragement in your exploration.

KEVIN: Thank you.

ELIAS: And to you, in tremendous affection, au revoir.

Elias departs at 12:19 PM.

Previous session | Go to the top | Next session