the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.

Home

Introduction

Digests

Transcripts

Exercises

Gems

Library

Search

Donate

Thursday, August 10, 2000

<  Session 679 (Private/Phone)  >

ďSeizures/Blinking OutĒ

ďMerging EnergiesĒ

ďCity ImageryĒ


Participants: Mary (Michael) and Lisa (Yaulyn).

Elias arrives at 12:38 p.m. (Arrival time is 17 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good day!

LISA: Good morning! (Elias chuckles) So, how have you been?

ELIAS: As always!

LISA: (Laughing) Great answer! (Elias chuckles) So, Iím sure you have a lot of helpful information for me today.

ELIAS: And what shall be your choice of direction in discussion?

LISA: Well, first I have kind of a simple question, and itís about my essence name and alignment. I believe, before we spoke, that you had give Taulyn as an essence name for me, and then I think Katie or somebody talked to you, and it changed to Yaulyn, which my boyfriend agrees with. What I wonder is, if my essence name is changing, does that mean something about my tone is changing? Is that correct?

ELIAS: Not entirely. It is a fluctuation, and both translations of essence name are correct.

LISA: Oh, so Iím not actually changing it.

ELIAS: It is a fluctuation in tone associated with the energy of your essence as it interacts within consciousness with the mergences of other essences.

Now; let me explain to you, this type of action occurs continuously, and may not necessarily alter or influence the tone of a particular essence. But within some interactions, there IS a fluctuation of tone.

I shall also express to you that in the identification of tone of essences, the expression of essence is not static. Therefore, it is not absolute, and in not being absolute Ė even without the action of mergence with other essences within consciousness Ė there is a fluctuation of tone, as each essence is in continuous motion, and in a manner of speaking, a continuous state of alteration in its exploration of self.

Now; at times, an essence may be experiencing this fluctuation in tone, and the translation of the tone may appear to you, in words, to be quite different. But in some fluctuations Ė in actuality, many fluctuations Ė that occur in tone, it may be so slight that the translation, as it is expressed within your language, may appear as a slight change in the actual word.

Now; in this, I may express to you that the consistent expression of tone within your essence translates into the word of Yaulyn.

This is not to say that it may not be in fluctuation futurely, for it shall be. But the most consistent expression of tone, which may be expressed in translation into a word within your physical reality, would be expressed with the sound of the ďY.Ē

LISA: Okay. When I have these experiences or when Iím experiencing this fluctuation, and the fluctuation gets translated in such a way that my tone actually changes, how does that affect my experience, or does it?

ELIAS: It does not necessarily affect your experience within your physical reality. At times it may, if you are allowing that type of action.

Now; what I am expressing to you in this is that if you are allowing yourself an openness to that type of action Ė within the expression of essence, in relation to a specific movement that you may be creating within your reality in the moment Ė you may allow yourself a recognition of the expression of this fluctuation in synchronicity, so to speak, with your experiences in your physical reality.

But I shall also express to you that for the most part in an individualís experience within physical focus, they do not offer themselves, generally, an affectingness or an awareness of these fluctuations in tone in their objective physical reality.

LISA: Okay, but I do.

ELIAS: At times.

LISA: Right.

ELIAS: And in this, you are allowing this action, as I have stated, in direct relation to what you are exploring and creating within your physical reality.

LISA: Is this fluctuation something that I can willfully create? I mean, once Iíve experienced the fluctuation, can I recall it and use it again consciously? Would there be a reason to do that?

ELIAS: This is an interesting question! (Chuckling)

I may express to you, in actuality, yes, if you are so choosing, you do hold the ability to be intentionally manipulating energy and creating a mergence with another essence and experiencing a fluctuation of tone. Or, you may allow yourself to be creating a movement of energy within your own essence in a type of exploration of self that shall also create this type of action of fluctuation of tone, and you may be objectively aware of this action if you are so choosing.

I may express to you that within the design of your physical reality and within the familiarity of its present construct, this type of action would be requiring of the individual to be familiarizing themselves with self extensively, and allowing themselves an objective recognition of their own movement in an expression that you may term to be often, which is not impossible and is in actuality an expression that may be accomplished much more easily in the movement of this shift in consciousness.

As to whether this may be purposeful in your experience, I may also express to you that ALL that you engage and choose is purposeful. You may engage this type of action merely in curiosity, and it shall be beneficial and purposeful. (Chuckling)

LISA: Yeah, I have a way of playing in purposeful ways! (Laughing, and Elias chuckles)

Okay, you talk about this fluctuation, and how mergence with other energies can kind of contribute to that, and so that leads me to a question that I have about Buddy, this guy that Iím with. He and I have a lot of experiences. I know we have many, many shared focuses, and the stream of discovery of new focuses is pretty much constant. I also know that weíre obviously engaged in some kind of interaction with each other, but Iím not sure whether itís a blending of energies thatís taking place, or if itís a counterpart type of action or what. Whatís going on with us?

ELIAS: You are not engaging a counterpart action with this individual in this present now. You are allowing yourselves to be exploring a mergence of energies in a physical expression.

Now; let me express to you, this mergence of energies within essence, as I have stated, is an occurrence that is created quite constantly. Within physical objective reality and experiences, it is less frequent. This is not to say that you are not engaging an action of mergence, or as you state, blending of energy with other individuals in physical focus, but you do not allow yourselves an objective awareness of this action.

What you are allowing yourself presently is an exploration of this action, and allowing yourself the objective recognition of it. This is beneficial to you in an objective manner, as it allows you to view less separation, and through experience, offer yourself an objective understanding of that concept of no separation.

In this, you may also allow yourself to engage this type of awareness in relation to other individuals.

LISA: Okay. So, we had an experience where one evening, we both felt as if we were occupying the same space, and our energy kind of rearranged to where our actual appearance to other individuals would not have been any different, but our energy was definitely blended in a different way, and that really did happen that way, it sounds like.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

Now; let me express to you a clarification. You have not necessarily rearranged or reconstructed your energies.

What you have accomplished is turning your perceptions and allowing yourselves to view the actual lack of separation in your energies and in your interactions with each other. And you are correct Ė were another individual to allow themselves the opportunity to view the two of you within that moment through the perception of no separation, they would view one expression, not two.

LISA: Right. So basically, we were just shifting our perception, is what youíre saying.

ELIAS: Correct.

LISA: And anyone else who was there and was willing to shift their perception would see one single unit, not two people merged.

ELIAS: Yes.

LISA: Okay, I understand.

ELIAS: In this, you may be quite playful with this type of action and offer yourself actual visual validation of this type of expression, in allowing yourselves to watch the movement of your energy fields as they become one energy field.

LISA: Yeah, I think we saw some of that, although it wasnít like watching as an observer from the outside. It was more like watching from within. Does that make sense?

ELIAS: Yes.

LISA: Okay. (Elias chuckles) So thatís what was going on.

ELIAS: Yes.

LISA: Okay. Can I ask you several other things about this person?

ELIAS: You may.

LISA: We know weíve had a lot of shared focuses, and I believe heís in his first focus, and he believes so too. Can you confirm that?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

LISA: And we hold many, many focuses together. Many are in the 19th century and the basic geographic region where we are now, correct?

ELIAS: Not many, but you do engage in focuses together in that time framework and in that location, yes.

LISA: Yeah, weíre aware of those, I guess is the point. How many total focuses does he have? (Pause)

ELIAS: Total numbering of focuses within this physical dimension, 908.

LISA: Wow. And how many do we have that are shared? I have like 800 and something, I think.

ELIAS: You are correct. Numbering of shared focuses, 606.

LISA: (Laughing) Thatís not surprising! Okay, there are a couple other things that I want to ask you about. Can I just quickly tell you what they are, and you tell me which one is more interesting?

ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! (Lisa laughs and Elias chuckles)

LISA: The first thing thatís been going on is, thereís a lot of imagery about the cities. Iíve seen THE city that I guess weíre building as part of this game. Iíve never really been there, but Iíve interacted with it and Iíve seen it, and I think I help to create elements of it.

But what Iím seeing, and I think interacting with, is imagery of a gothic-type city. Itís more what youíd expect if you were picturing the doomsday type of events that people are expecting around the new millennium. I donít think that my interest in that is ... thatís not really consistent with who I am. I donít tend to dwell on that kind of imagery, but itís been very, very strong, and itís appeared in my dreams a whole lot of times.

Iíve been talking to friends about it, and to me it seems that the city Iím interacting with is almost a counterpart city to THE city, and what I feel like Iím doing with it is, Iím creating aspects of experience that I donít really wish to experience objectively and I donít really want to make part of THE city. Does this make sense?

ELIAS: Yes.

LISA: And so itís like, Gotham is holding these aspects that I wish not to experience.

ELIAS: I am understanding. You are offering yourself the viewing and the interaction with this construct as imagery to yourself to be reinforcing of your direction, so to speak, in movement in relation to this shift in consciousness, and as you have stated, to not be offering an expression of energy to be reinforcing of those beliefs that incorporate devastation or the perpetuation of trauma.

Now; I shall also offer to you a validation that you have offered yourself the opportunity to be viewing an actual construct which is inserted into the physical reality which you view to be future, in like manner to the city of which many of you choose to be playing within and contributing to its development, so to speak.

Now; let me also express to you, what you are viewing is not an actual city. It is a construction in like fashion to what you identify now as a type of museum. It is not housed, so to speak, within one building, but rather is a construction of what [you] may term to be a ďmock cityĒ that is the design of the identification of the beliefs that were held in strength in association with prophecies and predictions.

These expressions within your reality are quite strong, and have been expressed for many centuries within your physical reality. Therefore, futurely within another time framework, individuals occupying that time framework view these expressions to be worthy of objectifying in recognition of historical events, in a manner of speaking, as an element of your human experience within this physical dimension.

LISA: So, they are really a holding place for traumas that weíve chosen not to create objectively.

ELIAS: Not necessarily as an expression of a holding place, so to speak. This is what YOU have created in your association with your viewing of this site, but the site itself is designed more as a type of historical exhibition in its construct.

LISA: So, there are quite a lot of us that have been creating it.

ELIAS: Quite; yes.

LISA: Okay, alright. The next thing is, Buddy and I had a strange experience. He had ... well, his doctor said it was a seizure. He was conscious and walking around and saying things that really didnít make a lot of sense. It was almost like he was sleepwalking.

I know youíve talked a lot about different states of consciousness, and you may have talked about this, and Iím sorry if you have. But for instance, when my grandmother died, I could feel her. I could feel her the moment she died. Her essence or her spirit was still there. But in this case, it was as if Buddyís essence had actually disappeared or popped out into another dimension or something. It definitely didnít seem to be HERE. I believe I wouldíve recognized it if it simply had been out of his body and within this dimension.

ELIAS: I am understanding of what you are expressing, and I shall be acknowledging of you in your noticing and your allowance of yourself to be objectively aware of this action.

I shall confirm to you that this is an action of blinking out, so to speak, which may be exhibited for a more extended time framework within your physical linear time than individuals generally express, although many individuals that are creating this type of action, in what you physically identify as a seizure, so to speak, are engaging that very activity Ė they are blinking out of this physical dimension.

What continues is the physical body consciousness, and it continues to be functioning, directing itself temporarily, for the objective and subjective awareness is not interactive with the body consciousness within that time framework, and is engaging its attention within another physical dimension.

The individual, generally speaking, does not allow an objective recall of this type of blinking out, although I may express to you, there are time frameworks in which some individuals do allow an aspect of memory in relation to this type of blinking out, but it is quite uncommon. It is much more common within your physical reality that the individual shall not allow themselves an objective recall or memory of the activity that they have engaged within another dimension.

LISA: Okay, I have another question. When my grandmother died, it was like I could feel her essence dispersing. I donít know, it was really strange, but I could feel that, and this time I didnít feel an exit. I didnít feel anything at all. So what was it that I actually felt when she left, when she died? And why didnít I feel it when he left? Do you....

ELIAS: Yes, I am understanding of what you are describing.

In the interaction with the individual that you identify as your grandmother, you are speaking of a disengagement, and in this, the individual focus, in the choice of disengagement, is not moving its awareness and its energy entirely outside of this physical dimension and experience immediately. And even within the experiences that may be created in which an individual IS creating an entire removal of their awareness from this physical dimension at the point of disengagement, what occurs within that time framework may be likened in energy to the trails, so to speak, of your physical atoms. The awareness may be removed from this physical area of consciousness, but energy deposits continue and may create what may appear to you, figuratively speaking, as a trail of energy.

Whereas in the experience that you have engaged with your friend, this individual has not chosen to be disengaging. This individual is engaging an action of blinking out. This is instantaneous. Instantaneously, the subjective and objective awareness are blinked out or removed from this physical reality, and refocused in another reality.

Now; you all create this action continuously, but the action is created at such a rapid speed within your physical time element that you are objectively not noticing of any interruption in the flow of your objective awareness. It appears to you to be constant and uninterrupted.

Within moments that an individual may be choosing to create this blinking out and extend the physical time framework of the blink-out, it becomes quite noticeable objectively to other individuals that the individual is not present. There are no trails, so to speak, of energy which are created and no residual energy deposits, for the physical body consciousness continues to be engaged.

LISA: Right, but theyíre not doing anything with it, including disengaging it.

ELIAS: Correct.

LISA: Okay, that makes sense.

ELIAS: The physical body consciousness has not been offered the communication by the subjective awareness to be creating disengagement, and the physical body consciousness shall continue without that instruction to the point in which the subjective interaction has disengaged for such an extended time framework, within your linear time expression, that the physical body consciousness may not continue independently.

But this is requiring of an extended time framework within your physical reality, and I may express to you, generally speaking, the individual shall return the subjective interaction to the body consciousness, and communicate a choice of action which it desires the body consciousness to function within.

LISA: Oh, okay. I have a quick entry for the game, if Katie hasnít already done it. Under musical instruments, we wanted to connect the acoustic guitar with Sumafi. (Pause)

ELIAS: Acceptable.

LISA: Okay, and thatís about our time, isnít it? Or is it?

ELIAS: (Chuckling) Very well! And I shall be encouraging of you to be continuing in your exploration of your experiences with this individual, for you may be fascinating yourself in this adventure, and not in the expression of conflict!

LISA: (Laughing) For a change!

ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha!

LISA: (Laughing) Okay. Well, thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

LISA: It was lovely talking with you.

ELIAS: And I anticipate our continued interaction. I offer to you great expression of energy in my expression, and I shall continue to be interactive with you playfully!

LISA: (Laughing) I look forward to it!

ELIAS: (Chuckling) To you in great affection, my friend, au revoir.

Elias departs at 1:20 p.m.


< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >


© 2000 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.