Monday, October 01, 2001
ďTemporarily Experimenting with a Different OrientationĒ
ďAffecting Mass Expressions, and the Intolerance of IntoleranceĒ
Participants: Mary (Michael) and George (Mahidad).
Elias arrives at 10:42 AM. (Arrival time is 24 seconds.)
ELIAS: Good morning!
GEORGE: Good morning! (Elias chuckles) I guess youíre okay ... everybody wants to say, ďHow are you?Ē and we all know how you are! (Elias laughs)
The first time we talked I forgot to ask you what my essence name and family, alignment, tone, color and all that stuff is for me, so I want to do that now. I also want to ask, does the essence name and family refer to an intent of that name and family, and does family alignment refer to qualities, or what are they referred to? Also, are there other scripts that give all these definitions so you donít have to take up a lot of time doing it?
ELIAS: Very well, my friend. I may express to you, yes, there are explanations of general expressions of qualities of each of the essence families which are an identification of the intents of each of these essence families. You may be interactive with Michael and he may be offering to you direction in relation to these particular transcriptions. (1)
Also I may express to you, although each essence family incorporates an intent and specific qualities, which each of you also incorporate individually in relation to the family that you are belonging to and the family that you are aligning with, you also incorporate an individual intent in each focus, which may be described as a direction of exploration of your particular focus in this physical dimension.
As to the identification of essence name, what is offered to you as an essence name is a translation of a tone which identifies what may be termed as the whole of your manifestations of all of your focuses of essence. Combined, all of these focuses express a tone of essence, and this may be translated into a word within your language that identifies your tone of essence, which you define as an essence name, so to speak. But this essence name does not necessarily identify an intent and is not necessarily associated with your intent in this focus. It is merely an identification of the tone of your particular essence.
Now; as to identification of your individual essence name and families, I shall offer to you: essence name, Mahidad, M-A-H-I-D-A-D (MAH hee dahd); essence family, Sumari; alignment in this focus, Ilda.
GEORGE: Could you spell the family name again and say the alignment name again?
ELIAS: You may be incorporating spelling with Michael.
ELIAS: Orientation, common; focus type, emotional.
Now; offer to myself your impression concerning your signature color.
GEORGE: My what?
ELIAS: Your signature color. What is your impression?
GEORGE: Well, the first thing that pops into my head is blue, but other than that I canít say.
However, I do want to say that in our first talk back in April, I understood that my orientation was soft. In fact I said that, and you said you agreed that that was correct. Has it changed?
ELIAS: You are correct, and I may express to you this is a temporary action.
Now; let me offer explanation. No, your orientation has not changed, so to speak. What I am offering to you is information within THIS time framework of an experimentation that you are engaging presently. I may also express to you, my friend, an acknowledgment of your noticing, for you have allowed yourself to be paying attention. In this, you incorporate a temporary experimentation of incorporating an experience of another orientation. I may also express to you, this type of action is RARELY incorporated within any particular focus.
Now; I may express to you that you have quite specifically chosen to be incorporating this action merely within a temporary time framework, to offer yourself a clearer understanding in this particular focus in relation to recent creations in mass events. Are you understanding?
GEORGE: Sort of understanding. The last few months have been very tumultuous for me, and I was going to bring this up later in my questions. I havenít, to my point of view, been able to do my homework because Iíve been so involved with this guy going into a nursing home and all that stuff. When you said ďcommonĒ what popped into my head was I havenít been able to ... the healing hasnít happened. My understanding of common is, common is a focus where youíre focused on stuff outside yourself, separated, and of course my feeling of separation has been extreme. In fact, I was going to say to call me Mr. Duplicity. (Elias laughs) So Iím not sure how to comment on what youíre saying. Please go on with it.
ELIAS: Very well. As I have stated, you have not altered your orientation. You have merely allowed yourself a temporary experience of allowing yourself to be tapping into the perception of the common orientation. Therefore, in this you have allowed yourself to be experiencing a temporary time framework in this focus intentionally to be incorporating a different understanding of what is being expressed in this time framework of mass events.
Now; in allowing yourself to be incorporating this temporary experience, you also allow yourself a recognition of unfamiliarity in more of an extreme.
Now; in actuality what you have chosen to be incorporating recently is quite efficient, for in this expression you have offered yourself an opening into many expressions of unfamiliarity, which allows you to be redefining more of your reality in alignment with this shift in consciousness.
Now; I am not expressing to you that you have incorporated this action of tapping into this other orientation perception for extended time framework, for you have not. You have allowed yourself this temporary experience merely within a brief recent time framework to allow yourself certain experiences that may be helpful to you individually in understanding the creations of mass events in association with the movement of this shift in consciousness presently. Therefore, I may express to you that you have incorporated this particular experience in your physical time framework for what may be identified as merely four of your weeks. In this present moment you continue to allow yourself this experience, but as I have stated, this is quite temporary and you have not changed your orientation in this focus.
In this, you are allowing yourself to be incorporating both perceptions simultaneously. Be remembering, this type of action is quite rare.
GEORGE: Thatís very interesting. Can I ask how many previous physical focuses Iíve had? I assume itís a lot.
ELIAS: You are inquiring as to total numbering of focuses in this physical dimension?
GEORGE: Yes. (Pause)
ELIAS: Numbering of focuses, 3001.
GEORGE: Great; understand. Now, I was going to ask how many future focuses because Iíve heard that discussed in other scripts, but in our first meeting you agreed that Iím in a final focus, and I talked about resolving the word ďphysical,Ē in other words, resolving the mistake of our five senses. So from that point of view, if a human being gets to the point where they resolve the physical illusions and they get into a final focus, then the idea of the concept of future physical focuses would become moot. There wouldnít be any future physical focuses as such.
ELIAS: Not necessarily, my friend, for in actuality, as you may be aware, all of your focuses are simultaneous and the designation of the final focus is not associated with linear time framework. It is what may be deemed as a position, not necessarily final focus in relation to sequence in association with time.
The designation of the final focus is a position of action. This is the focus that, in a manner of speaking, determines the disengagement of the essence attention in the particular physical dimension. Therefore, as a final focus you are the designated focus that chooses the disengagement of attention of the essence in this physical dimension, but this is not in relation to time.
GEORGE: And again, what youíve just said brings me back to the idea which I think you agreed with before, that one can get to this idea of disengagement in this focus. One doesnít have to go to the end of what people call death to do it. (Pause)
ELIAS: You are entertaining the idea that you may be disengaging from this physical focus but continuing within physical manifestation?
GEORGE: Right, but see, what Iíve been telling myself and telling other people is, the reason this separation, this apparent separation that weíre all mired and confused in and the human race has been wallowing in for a long, long time, is because theyíre hooked on the five senses, which are interpreted materially. The fact is itís equivalent to having a television set thatís locked on one channel or trying to figure out whatís in a room by looking through a keyhole.
What the shift is really all about is a whole lot of people, without reference to specific numbers, waking up to the point where they see through that, and therefore they can remain. They may remain what appears to be physical to other people, but they see themselves quite differently.
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, you are correct; which, in a manner of speaking, this already occurs, but you within this physical dimension are not objectively aware for you incorporate a singularity of attention. You are also correct that in the movement of this shift in consciousness you shall be incorporating a wider awareness objectively, which shall familiarize you more fully with this type of identification that you are expressing presently.
For as I have stated, outside of the creation of linear time which you associate with in your physical dimension, all actions are occurring simultaneously. It is not necessarily a matter of manifestations and actions but of attention; and therefore, although an individual may be designated as a final focus and this may express the movement of attention of the essence from the physical dimension, your recognition that the physical manifestations continue is correct, for they are all occurring simultaneously.
As expressed in example with myself, I no longer focus attention within your physical dimension, but the manifestations of my essence are expressed physically in simultaneous time in relation to your physical dimension.
GEORGE: To some extent, if we wake up to a certain point we realize that we are expressing what you are expressing.
GEORGE: I guess I donít need to have you comment on my original intent, because youíve already done that.
What is my relationship to Tom C, this friend that Iíve had since the 1950s? We both want to know. Heís sort of mentioned that I could ask that.
ELIAS: And what is your impression, my friend?
GEORGE: Based on the fact that heís the one who turned me on to who you are, I would simply guess that we must have had some past karmic connections and we may be in this focus waking up to them. Thatís the only thing that makes any sense to me.
ELIAS: You do incorporate other focuses together, and if you are so choosing you may allow yourselves to be investigating of those shared focuses that you incorporate with each other. You may allow yourselves to be incorporating visualizations or dream meetings or meditations together, or you may be choosing to incorporate these actions individually and interact with each other concerning what you have discovered in your investigations of these focuses.
GEORGE: Another question that goes back a little ways, have I had relationships with you in previous focuses while you were in physical focus? (Pause)
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking. You do incorporate some focuses of attention in the same time frameworks with my manifestations and in [the same] physical location, and in some have created encounters with myself, but for the most part do not incorporate what you term to be relationship with myself. Although, I may express to you that you do incorporate one focus of attention in which you do express a type of relationship with myself.
GEORGE: Well, I can explore that.
Thereís another question relating to relationships. My relationship with this Christian Science guy in Boston worked out not very well. But as a result of it and my work with your transcripts and so on, is there a prior focus relationship with this person in Boston? Is there any point in trying to explore it or do anything about it, other than just know that it exists?
ELIAS: Yes, you do incorporate other focuses with this individual, and I may express to you that it is your choice whether you may be investigating of these focuses or not.
If you are attempting to investigate these focuses to be altering experiences in THIS focus, I may say to you that there is little point in that action. But if you are allowing yourself merely the investigation to be familiarizing yourself with YOU, this may be beneficial, but it may not necessarily be affecting of your interaction with this individual now.
What shall be affecting of your perception is to allow yourself to be paying attention to you and your expressions in relation to the other individual. This shall offer you information and may be affecting of your perception.
GEORGE: To get down to the nitty-gritty, in the realm of true confessions, because of what happened in my life since our first meeting, I really havenít done my homework. What Iíve discovered very recently Ė thinking simply of throwing out transcripts which I didnít read Ė what I of course discovered is that reading the transcripts is really extremely important for me in-between sessions. Of course, whatís happened is that there has been practically no resolution of healing of the lesions that are on my face and various other things which Iím sure youíre aware of. In other words, my duplicity and depression are quite great, and Iíve also been working on becoming more aware of how anger influences my life and has influenced my life, and of course that has been intensified by the mass event that occurred a couple of weeks ago.
I just would like to ask how I can ... really, if you could offer anything to really crack this barrier of space ... and I might also say that yesterday when I woke up I suddenly realized that I could barely recall anything about ages nine, ten, eleven and twelve, and I felt strongly that not recalling them has a great deal to do with all this blocking and inability to break through and so forth.
ELIAS: I shall express to you, my friend, no. In actuality, the lack of incorporation of memory of those particular ages within your focus are not affecting of what you are incorporating now. The reason that you incorporate little memory of that time framework is merely that you have chosen to be incorporating another aspect of self in the position of primary aspect, one that expressed different qualities than the one aspect that may be viewed as the main primary aspect throughout your individual focus.
In actuality, I may express to you that this type of action is quite commonly expressed within your physical dimension. Many individuals incorporate this type of action, and as they view years of their physical focuses they may express a lack of objective memory of different time frameworks within their focus, in which another aspect of self has moved into the primary aspect position.
This is not necessarily an affecting action of what you may be creating in the present now. Your association with that is expressed in alignment with psychological beliefs. It is strongly expressed within mass beliefs, in relation to your science of psychology, that certain experiences within certain time frameworks expressed in childhood, so to speak, are greatly affecting of your experiences subsequently within your focus. This, my friend, in actuality is a choice. It is not an absolute, and it is NOT an expression of cause and effect.
I may express to you that for the most part within your physical dimension, you do view experiences as absolutes, and therefore you do incorporate tremendous association with past experiences and allow the recall of past experiences to express an influence in relation to present experiences or anticipation of future experiences; but it is not an expression of absolute and cause and effect.
Now; in this, the challenge that you experience presently, as I have stated, is not associated with experiences created in childhood. You are choosing now to be manifesting certain expressions in relation to the movement that you are engaging NOW, not pastly.
The challenge that you express presently is that of genuinely paying attention to self, paying attention to your choices and what you are actually expressing as influenced by your beliefs. (Pause)
GEORGE: As I said ... let me mention this a different way. The feeling that Iíve had is almost continuous that I am on the brink of or have the power of transformation, translation, whatever you want to call it, to grasp and actualize being in the now, but what I experience is kind of a barrier or block. Itís as if my thinking faculties, which appear on the surface to be quite good ... but when I really try to actualize them within or presumably present myself with an opportunity to actualize them, what I experience is like the gears are stripped or theyíre frozen. The thinking process or the intelligence or whatever consciousness process simply is blocked and it doesnít work.
ELIAS: Ha ha! And I may express to you, my friend, in actuality you are creating an action which is quite efficient! For in this, what you are expressing is an intentional block of familiar movement, for it is not allowing you to move in the direction that you wish to be accomplishing within.
Now; what is familiar is the intellectualization and analyzation of actions and manifestations that you create within your focus, but what is unfamiliar is to be merely paying attention to what you are choosing and DOING in the now. The manner in which you consistently move your attention away from the now and what you are DOING and choosing in actuality in the moment is through distraction of thought.
You may view a particular manifestation that you create within any given time framework, but your attention is not directed to the moment and to the choice and the influences of the beliefs that are expressed in the moment. What you do pay attention to is your process of analyzation, which does not necessarily offer you answers.
Therefore, in this time framework what you are creating is an interruption of the distraction, the distraction being the familiar action of analyzation. You are interrupting that distraction to allow yourself an opportunity to recognize that your attention is actually not thought, and in that recognition allow yourself to move your attention from its intense focus upon thought to other expressions of yourself in relation to choice.
GEORGE: Iíll have to keep playing that one over and over again. Also, it really relates to those scripts where you dealt with this problem in terms of itching and scratching as being part of that whole process.
GEORGE: I want to ask a question about entity intrusion, based on my reading of other scripts in which you say that there is no intrusion of consciousness, no displacement or no breaking up of consciousness. But the fact appears to be that people experience what they consider to be possession, and a lot of work has been done about this. My question is that your statement is correct, but if a person opens themselves or believes, either ignorantly or consciously, that they can be intruded or possessed, then that will appear to them to be the case.
ELIAS: It may appear to them to be the situation, but it is not being expressed in relation to another essence. Those types of expressions and creations are created by the individual. There is no possession by another essence.
I may express to you, my friend, you may be opening your awareness to tremendous extent within your physical dimension and no other essence shall be intrusive and expressing this type of action that you identify as possession. That expression is created solely by the individual. It is quite real in their experience, and they are creating a tremendous expression of energy and may at times even express this energy to the extent of projecting a fear so intensely that they create an actual entity which may physically manifest within your physical dimension, but this is not an intrusion of another essence. This is created individually by an individual focus.
GEORGE: So the solution for that then is not to go ahead with a de-possession, but the solution would most likely be to work with somebody in a hypno-analytical sense or a hypno-regression sense to explore within the personís own consciousness whatís going on.
ELIAS: This is the choice of the individual. They have created that experience purposefully. They may or may not choose to be altering that experience.
GEORGE: Okay, I understand. Iíll move on.
In talking with a woman who has done an enormous amount of work in the realm of hypno-analysis, hypno-regression and so on Ė she did experiments back in the Ď80s, I believe, with electroencephalograms, computerized bio-feedback, being able to view oneís brainwaves on a computer monitor Ė and what they discovered was, which some people have known intuitively, was healing and (unintelligible) occurs when someone is maximizing what is called the delta band of brainwave frequencies. This technology is now available, and my feeling is that if one can access it, get to use it, that that would be possibly a very powerful way to break through some of this blocking that weíve been discussing, and that this would also be a way for these Indigo Children to make advances in balancing their own thinking and spiritual processes.
ELIAS: But you DO hold the ability to be expressing this action, my friend. You ALL incorporate that ability, and you do create that action in the moments that you choose to be expressing that type of movement. This is an innate ability that you incorporate within your physical expression; it is unnecessary to learn. It is merely a question of allowing yourself to become more familiar with your abilities.
GEORGE: So in other words, what I wrote here, it is a case of we donít know how to use our equipment because we forgot how to use it.
ELIAS: And this is the point of turning your attention to self and creating an intimate relationship with self and becoming familiar with what your abilities are.
GEORGE: Well, Iíll go on to the subject of Indigos, what you call ďsmall ones.Ē Iím continuing to interact with them, and this is an extraordinarily rewarding experience. Because of the interruptions in my life in the last two weeks, I havenít made much progress with pursuing that idea for the bookstore/cafes. When I talk to the Indigo kids and tell them about it, they all say itís a cool idea. Can you make any comments on how you see that that might be going, and whether we can educate the Indigos in time to make some impact on the events that have happened and so forth?
ELIAS: Express to myself, what do you identify as your intention in relation to these small ones, and what [do] you wish to accomplish in relation to these small ones?
GEORGE: Well, to make it explicit, it appears based on the reading and study that Iíve done and talking with the small ones ... most of the small ones I talk to are in the age range from say 16 to the mid-20s. When you talk to them directly they confirm the fact that from their point of view the present compulsory education system simply has failed; it doesnít work. On the other side, there are professionals who have been studying this for a long time, and the consensus of the people who have taken a look at it is that the present compulsory education system is an absolute failure and that no one is going to fix it. So the question arises, what alternatives can be provided?
The concept that Iím coming up with is a network of small bookstore/cafes that would contain all of the books, selected books and maybe other materials, that someone would really need to get educated and then provide a venue where these kids and other people who are interested could come together and have access to this material, as opposed to large bookstores now with hundreds of thousands of books in them that serve these young people, and other people as well, being unable to find what they need. Of course, this is now premised on the observation that theyíre not learning anything in their public schools and their churches and so on. The things that they need to know are not being given to them.
ELIAS: And what do you perceive it is that they need to know?
GEORGE: Well, what I perceive is their level of consciousness is at the same level, you might say, as some of the people who are accessing you, some of the middle-aged and older people that are accessing you. They have this openness in consciousness now, but they have no Ė how shall I say it? Ė no knowledge of how to pursue it. They have no access to any metaphysical teachings. They certainly have no access to you...
ELIAS: Ah, but they do! This is the choice of the individuals. I may express to you, my friend, that these individuals incorporate access to all information in like manner to yourself or any other individual. They are not deprived, and they are not being denied any information.
I may express to you that you may incorporate interaction with these individuals, if you are choosing, in relation to your own incorporation of pleasure in the interaction with these individuals, and also perhaps to offer yourself information concerning YOU; and if you are so choosing, you may be incorporating action to be establishing such types of areas in which you may interact with these individuals and they may interact with you or with each other. But examine your motivation, my friend, for there is no expressed need.
You are correct that in your terms these individuals incorporating young ages are manifest with quite open awareness in relation to this shift in consciousness. They do allow themselves an exploration of concepts which you access information concerning, through myself or through what you may term to be other resources. These individuals, for the most part, incorporate an understanding of these concepts already, for they have manifest in this time framework in association with the movement of this shift in consciousness, and therefore they incorporate a recognition of their ability to access information without books.
This is not to say that you may not choose to be incorporating interaction with these individuals and encouraging interaction with each other if they are so choosing, but what you may be allowing yourself to examine presently is your motivation in this direction. Examine the beliefs that are expressing influence in relation to what you express as a direction of movement of yourself, for you are being influenced by beliefs that create an automatic response that you need be helping these individuals and teaching these individuals that they may continue, and therefore they shall change your reality.
GEORGE: In other words, it gets back to the fact of duplicity. As a matter of fact, as you spoke I realized that I have had flashes on the idea that maybe they donít need books after all Ė very dim flashes.
Weíre running out of time. Can I go on with a couple other questions?
GEORGE: Relative to the terrible events of a couple of weeks ago, can you shed any light on our ability to select or change or stop the madness thatís been going around in Washington? We have a very, what I view and I think a lot of other people view, as a very corrupt government.
A couple of days ago I saw a book on human ethics with respect to the 20th century, and one of the things that this book dealt with was the events of the 20th century. One of the things it pointed out is that while weíre all upset about this terrible event that happened a couple of weeks ago, the fact of the matter is that as we speak, on this planet in maybe 10, 20, or 30 countries the most horrible forms of torture are being used on human beings. They have been used and theyíre being used continuously and so on.
I donít know how to phrase this or say this, but can you offer some counsel or words on developing our abilities to bring this human madness that has been part of the human race for a long, long time, either diffusing it, bringing it to a halt, or changing it?
ELIAS: I may express to you, my friend, quite simply, the manner in which you affect these types of expressions genuinely and literally lies in your expression of turning your attention to self. For as you continue to project your attention to other individuals and you continue to express the judgments concerning the choices of other individuals, in actuality what you are engaging is an offering of energy in perpetuation of these expressions. In paying attention to self and recognizing your OWN judgments, your own expressions of duplicity, your own lack of acceptance, you may alter that within self, and this is GREATLY affecting within your physical dimension. This is the point, my friend.
For allow yourself to observe within yourself in this present now your own expression of matching energies. For you offer yourself information concerning your 20th century and events that have occurred, and choices and experiences of other individuals that you deem to be bad, wrong, terroristic, and in that association, as you incorporate a strength in judgment, you are expressing the very energy that you express to myself that you wish to discontinue.
GEORGE: This is very, very helpful. I will study this. Weíve run over time a little bit, and Iím extraordinarily grateful for these words and your counsel. Itís just exactly what I need.
ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend. Let me offer to you one statement that you may allow yourself to examine and assimilate. The matching of energies is the expression of the intolerance of intolerance, the lack of acceptance of the lack of acceptance. Therefore, allow yourself an awareness of self and how you create this expression also. This shall be greatly affecting.
GEORGE: Iíll do it. I appreciate you, great friend, so much.
ELIAS: I offer to you, as always, tremendous affection and great encouragement, and I shall be offering my energy to you in this encouragement.
GEORGE: I welcome it. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
ELIAS: I anticipate our next meeting, and offer to you a word of encouragement: fear not! Within the movement that you are creating presently and the probabilities that you are engaging presently, I may express to you that you shall be disengaging this examination of the common orientation quite quickly! Ha ha ha ha!
GEORGE: Thank you, thank you, good friend, and blessings to your wonderful work.
ELIAS: To you this day, au revoir.
GEORGE: Thanks again.
(1) Information about the nine essence families can be found in the transcript of Session 67, January 21, 1996.
© 2001 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.