Home

Introduction

Digests

Transcripts

Exercises

Gems

Library

Search

Donate

  Session 1056 (Group/New York)  

“Defining ‘Impression’”

“The Role of Observing Essence”

Participants: Mary (Michael), Ben (Albert), Bryce (Ximeu), Evan (Bradley), Frank (X-tian), Matt (Blythe), Mike (Mikah), Pat (Treice), Sandy (Allesander), Suki (Lissethe), Tracy.

Elias arrives at 3:06 PM. (Arrival time is 33 seconds.)

ELIAS: Welcome!

GROUP: Hi!

FRANK: (Singing) Hello, Elias! We are here!

ELIAS: A serenade by Christian! (Laughs)

I propose that this afternoon I shall open the floor to you all, and you may incorporate your questioning if you are so choosing.

SANDY: We were talking about early anatomically modern humans during the Ice Age, Paleolithic times. What’s up with that art on the cave walls?

ELIAS: Clarify.

SANDY: It seems very dynamic and fully formed for such an early expression, and this is interesting to me.

ELIAS: And why shall it not be?

SANDY: I do not know.

ELIAS: Are these expressions of your species any less than yourself? They are essences. (Pause)

SANDY: I suppose not!

ELIAS: Quite. It is merely an expression of creativity. Language is expressed in many manners. The language that you incorporate in words is much less efficient than the expression that may be incorporated in other manners. Pictures and energy convey an entire scenario in one expression.

SANDY: They do.

ELIAS: Within one moment, you incorporate an understanding of the entirety of the scenario.

SANDY: That would account for why there’s a dynamic element to these.

ELIAS: Quite. It is an expression of energy. Energy is understood much more accurately and efficiently than language and words.

SANDY: That’s why these things still speak to us.

ELIAS: Quite, for it is quite difficult to camouflage energy. Even if you attempt to camouflage energy it shall matter not, for if another individual is allowing an openness, they shall know what you are camouflaging. There are no secrets within consciousness.

SANDY: Indeed!

ELIAS: HA HA HA! (Laughter) Is this sufficient answer to your question?

SANDY: Yes.

ELIAS: Very well. (Chuckles)

TRACY: Can I ask you a question?

ELIAS: You may.

TRACY: When you said something about languages, I’ve always wondered, is there an Indo-European language originally like linguists hypothesize, and if so, where was that? You know what I’m asking? They tried to reconstruct this mother language that everything grew out of. (Pause)

ELIAS: No. For individuals in what you term historically as clans within different physical locations create their own unique expression of language.

TRACY: Then how do you account for the similarities between ancient languages like Greek and Sanskrit? Was it originally one clan that kept this (inaudible)?

ELIAS: No. This also is an expression of energy.

As you portray within pictures, you also express within language. It may appear that languages may be expressed quite differently, but there are similarities, which is the reason that you speculate that they all stem from one origin. But in actuality, it is a similarity of the expressions of energy. You recognize similar expressions within your physical dimension, and in some expressions they may be expressed in language similarly also, just as your pictures shall display similar images.

TRACY: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

EVAN: Can I ask you about some of the more interesting focuses I’ve shared with the people that are here today?

ELIAS: And shall you offer an impression?

EVAN: What’s an impression? I’m not sure.

BEN: It’s a guess about...

ELIAS: NOT guessing! (Laugher)

BEN: I have an impression!

ELIAS: Very well.

BEN: I have an impression that Matt has a focus as a famous painter.

ELIAS: You are correct, and...?

BEN: Is he a Latin American painter?

ELIAS: You are correct, and...?

BEN: Do you think he’s Diego Rivera?

MIKE: Yes! (Elias nods in assent.)

GROUP: Whoa! (Laughter)

BEN: So that’s how it works then!

FRANK: There’s nothing to it, right?

ELIAS: An impression is a communication to yourself. It may not necessarily appear initially to be rational or logical, and it may also appear within your rational thought process to be an expression of imagination. But what you do not recognize within your beliefs is that imagination is also a communication and quite real. What you may imagine in some expression of consciousness is.

Therefore, as you offer yourself information and you generate an impression that may translate into a feeling or an image or a thought, in allowing yourself to become familiar with this inner language and trusting that inner language, as bizarre as it may seem to you objectively, you are offering yourself information.

In this, within your focus, what holds fascination to you?

EVAN: A pigeon. It was just on the ledge. It was very fascinating. It wanted to get inside. Could I have shared a focus with a pigeon, then?

ELIAS: (Chuckles) Not necessarily. (Group laughter) But your fascination is with your participation in the creation of the pigeon and its movement.

Now; what do you incorporate as fascinations throughout your focus that you may express as recognizing a draw to specific cultures or time frameworks?

EVAN: I like Japanese culture: I imagine I have a strong connection with that.

ELIAS: And the reason that you draw this culture is that you incorporate other focuses in that culture. This is the manner in which you allow yourself to trust yourself and to listen to your communication within you, which offers you tremendous volumes of information. You may tap into this quite easily in merely allowing yourself to listen.

EVAN: Did I ever share a focus with Bryce in ancient Japan?

ELIAS: Yes, and also with Mikah.

MIKE: We were Samurais together?

ELIAS: Yes.

MIKE: Did we kill each other, too?

ELIAS: No.

FRANK: I’m disappointed!

ELIAS: (Humorously) Are you generating a fixation on murder? (Laughter)

EVAN: Did we slaughter people together?

ELIAS: This may be your perception presently; but in response to your question, yes, this may be the identification of an action that you engaged.

MIKE: What time framework was that focus of ours?

ELIAS: And your impression?

MIKE: 1400 AD.

ELIAS: Earlier.

MIKE: 300 AD?

EVAN: 900 AD.

ELIAS: Nine.

BEN: Ooo, one point! I have an impression that Tracy has been to the opera with Bosie before, wearing a green carnation. (Pause)

ELIAS: Correct.

TRACY: Now, I’ve always wanted to know why I’m so drawn to Oscar Wilde. When I first read him, it was like this spiritual connection. It’s an obsession, almost. I have a green carnation tattoo. Did I know him?

FRANK: And she reads Greek once a day, for you!

TRACY: It’s because of Oscar I studied Greek.

ELIAS: Yes.

TRACY: Can you tell me...?

ELIAS: And your impression?

TRACY: I don’t think I was one of his lovers. I thought maybe one of his close friends.

ELIAS: Correct.

TRACY: Ada Leverson or...?

BEN: Robert Hitchens?

ELIAS: In this moment, listen to your impression.

TRACY: Well, it couldn’t have been someone as important as Robbie Ross.

ELIAS: Observing essence; yes, you are correct.

BEN: But she also had directing essence at the same time?

ELIAS: Yes, but not in a tremendous expression of interaction – much lesser, as a schoolmate.

TRACY: A schoolmate of Oscar’s?

ELIAS: Correct.

The observing essence role may be quite impactful, dependent upon the intensity of the allowance of the experience of the observing essence and if that essence chooses to participate throughout the entirety of the focus or merely a portion of the focus.

In this situation, your essence chooses to be observing essence throughout the entirety of the focus. What I am expressing in this is that you are offering yourself no less experience in this focus than the directing essence. The experience is the same. Therefore, what you term to be the connection incorporates equal intensity.

The definition of observing essences is no less than the action of a directing essence. The experience is no less; the value is no less. You generate associations and distinctions of directing and observing, for you generate beliefs associated with control. Therefore if you are not the controlling essence, your role is lessened, and this is quite incorrect for one essence is not controlling and another essence is not expressing a lack of control. They are sharing an experience, a choice of a manifestation, and as an observing essence you are merely choosing to be merging with another essence, which is an action that essences generate continuously.

There is no separation within consciousness; therefore, this is not an unusual expression to be merging with other essences. This mergence does not merely occur within nonphysical expressions of consciousness. It also occurs in physical expressions of manifestations, and in this, at times you may even generate a new focus, so to speak, of your essence in allowing for an intensity of the experience of the observing role within a particular focus.

Therefore I express to you each, do not be discounting of the action of observing essence as any less than that of the directing essence. The point of this physical manifestation is merely exploration of yourself.

TRACY: So I was an observing essence?

ELIAS: Yes.

MIKE: Can I ask a focus question? How many focuses do I share with Matt?

ELIAS: And your impression?

MIKE: Five.

ELIAS: Eight. Mikah is fascinated with statistics. (Group discussion, laughter, and Elias laughs)

SANDY: Treice and I seem to have a connection in many different focuses. Can I offer an impression of seven shared focuses? (Pause)

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: And one of those is in Mongolia.

ELIAS: Two.

SANDY: One is in North America?

ELIAS: Yes.

SANDY: That would be the early 1700s?

ELIAS: Yes.

SANDY: Do we have Native American focuses as well that we share?

ELIAS: This IS an identification of what you term to be Native American.

SANDY: I’d like to take a stab at what that group would be called – the Lenni Lenape? (Pause)

ELIAS: Ah. What you are identifying is not necessarily what you term to be a tribe, but a family within a group. These individuals are actually not located within the physical boundaries of the country that you occupy presently but more northerly.

SANDY: Great Lakes area?

ELIAS: More northerly.

SANDY: I seem to incorporate many focuses in military regards. I would offer maybe 12?

ELIAS: Eighteen.

SANDY: I recently dreamed I was in action in the Napoleonic Wars, where I was covering a rear-guard action in a general army retreat and that focus disengaged from that. (Pause)

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: Does the Elias essence share a focus within that military action that took place?

ELIAS: (Chuckles) No, this essence has generated a manifestation as a renegade.

SANDY: As a renegade? Interesting.

ELIAS: A rebel.

MIKE: Can I ask something again?

ELIAS: You may.

MIKE: Was one of the Mongolian focuses that Sandy and Pat shared had anything to do with the Hun focuses that me and Frank shared? (Pause)

ELIAS: No.

SANDY: They’re two different time periods you’re talking about. I think the Mongolian thing was the 1340s. Was 1340 part of our Mongolian focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

MIKE: And the other one?

SANDY: I must say, 1280?

ELIAS: Slightly earlier.

PAT: Does Sandy have any connection to my future focus of Alex?

ELIAS: In shared focus, yes.

PAT: So we share that focus?

ELIAS: You participate together.

SANDY: Last summer I had an image of a person from the future who was looking at a light bulb, not actually a light bulb but a light-generating device. When I connected with this, I understood exactly how this device functioned. Was that via an Alex type of an exchange, or was that my own focus from the future that I was picking up on?

ELIAS: Your focus.

SANDY: May I offer a time period for when that fellow is?

ELIAS: You may.

SANDY: 2201? (Pause)

ELIAS: Twenty-two eleven.

BEN: Does Evan have any focuses as prostitutes?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Would that be during the French Revolution?

ELIAS: One.

EVAN: What is this related to?

BEN: Marjorie ran a brothel in the French Revolution. (Group discussion and Elias laughs)

ELIAS: I suspect it may be more appealing to be a warrior than a prostitute. Ha ha ha!

BEN: I’m sure Evan can handle both roles! (Elias laughs)

EVAN: Especially at once! Did I ever share a focus where I was both at once? (Group laughter) A warrior-prostitute or a prostitute-warrior?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking – as a gypsy! Ha ha ha!

SANDY: I have attempted to offer myself impressions as to my essence family. At first I thought it was Milumet, but the name Milumari came to me instead. Am I way off the base on this one?

ELIAS: No, you are merely combining the two families, Milumet and Sumari. You align with one; you belong to another.

SANDY: Do I belong to Milumet and align Sumari? (Pause)

ELIAS: Reverse.

SANDY: I’ve had some experiences throughout my life where I seem to be able to enter into people and feel what they are feeling and thinking and chewing and eating. I’m wondering if this is a dispersed essence action or if it’s an extension of an inner sense?

ELIAS: It is an action of an inner sense, that of your empathic sense. You all incorporate this inner sense and may engage it within any moment. Some individuals allow themselves to be engaging this inner sense more freely than other individuals, but you all incorporate this inner sense.

SANDY: It comes very naturally to me. Is this part of the fact that I’m aligned with the Milumet family?

ELIAS: It is an allowance in association with the expressions of that family, yes.

SANDY: Treice and I belong to a little group where we frequently meet up every other week, and we’ve been practicing clarity exercises and other types of exercises that you’ve offered. Within this action, I’m noticing my physical senses are altering quite a bit. My sense of smell has increased – that was the first thing that happened – followed by taste, hearing, and now we’re working deliberately on expanding the visual field. What was my question? (Group laughter) Any comments on this?

ELIAS: You may incorporate this action with any sense, an inner or outer sense, as you practice and move your attention more clearly to the expressions of each of these senses. You may, in your terms, sharpen them and express much more clarity in relation to any of them, for the reason that they appear to you to be dull is that you do not pay attention. Attention is a powerful expression.

SANDY: As one pays attention to inner senses or to outer senses, there seems to be a feedback between the two. Is this accurate?

ELIAS: Yes. All of your senses are interconnected. They all offer you information. They are all avenues of communication.

SANDY: So by practicing either inside or outside or both, the bandwidth increases as the amount of information available to be perceived is actually consciously recognized.

ELIAS: Correct, in objective terms; yes.

EVAN: Did I ever have a focus as a cook or a chef in Pomerania or Prussia around the 17th century or 18th century?

ELIAS: Seventeenth century, yes.

EVAN: Did I cook for anyone here? (Pause)

ELIAS: (Looking around the room and indicating Suki, Frank, Mike, Pat, and Bryce) One – two – three – four – five individuals.

FRANK: Did any of those people disengage after they ate? (Group laughter)

ELIAS: Perhaps the chef! (Laughter)

MIKE: Where was that? Was that Prussia or...?

ELIAS: Prussia.

TRACY: So when we die, do we automatically go on to be another person or our focus is redirected or...? What happens?

ELIAS: No.

TRACY: What happens when we die?

ELIAS: You are a focus of attention in manifestation. You are also all of essence. No one focus of attention is any less than any other focus of attention and is not a piece of an essence. It is an attention of essence.

TRACY: So the essence continues?

ELIAS: Yes. View yourself within this one manifestation. As an individual, you may direct your attention in many different expressions. You may direct your attention in one area within one moment, and you may incorporate a different subject matter or movement in another moment and move your attention and be directing of it differently.

In this, are you any less of you if your attention is focused upon the action of reading a book or your attention is focused upon interaction with myself presently? No. You continue to be you, but your attention moves.

You, in this physical dimension as an essence, incorporate many attentions, but you are engaging a physical dimension of consciousness; therefore, each of your attentions is manifest into a physical form. They are all occurring simultaneously.

In this, in like manner to yourself in this manifestation, you may incorporate moving your attention to many different expressions and actions simultaneously and not interrupt your attention in any of the directions or expressions. In similar manner, essences direct all of these attentions simultaneously, but they are manifest in physical forms.

At the point that you choose to be disengaging, or death, of any focus of attention, any physical manifestation, that attention does not cease.

TRACY: It doesn’t?

ELIAS: No, but it also does not re-manifest, for what is the point? All of your focuses are simultaneously manifest. This is an attention. You are all of essence in this focus of attention. You are no less of essence in this focus of attention than you are any less of you in any different action that you incorporate within this manifestation.

TRACY: So what happens if two focuses of the same essence meet? Can that happen?

ELIAS: Yes. I may express to you, generally speaking there is little or no interest or attraction, for it is you. Therefore, you do not generate, generally speaking, a fascination with another focus of you within the same time framework. You may incorporate somewhat of an interest or fascination with other focuses within other time frameworks. But within the same time framework, generally speaking, there is slight to no noticeable expression of attraction, for it is merely a mirror image of yourself which is choosing to be exploring a different aspect of yourself, a different experience of yourself, [and] you incorporate that experience as essence. Therefore, you generate no interest.

TRACY: So we tend to be attracted to people we knew in other times, other focuses we had previously?

ELIAS: Generally speaking, yes. You attract to familiarity in energy and similarities of preferences of essences.

We shall break and you may continue with your questions, and for the little mice in the corner, you may join at any moment. (Chuckles) We shall continue shortly.

Break at 3:47 PM.
Resume at 4:30 PM. (Arrival time is 23 seconds.)

ELIAS: Continuing! (Pause) Or not! (Group laughter)

SANDY: Can I offer an impression of my essence name?

ELIAS: You may.

SANDY: Allesandrey.

ELIAS: Alter “ay” to “ah.”

SANDY: Allesandra? (1)

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: May I offer the number of focuses I believe I have?

ELIAS: You may.

SANDY: Twelve hundred thirty-nine.

ELIAS: Alter 39: 93.

SANDY: I feel that I am a final focus.

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: Can I offer up some impressions on friends’ essence names and families?

ELIAS: You may.

SANDY: Terra: essence name, Jake; Sumari/Ilda. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence families correct; essence name, Jill.

SANDY: Jerry, my friend: Sumari/Tumold; essence name, Jonas? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence families correct; essence name, Abel.

SANDY: One final person, my friend, Suzanne: essence family, Vold; alignment, Tumold; name, Melinda. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence families correct; essence name, Voni, V-O-N-I (voh NEE).

SANDY: One last one, my little one: Milumet/Zuli; essence name, Misha. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence families correct; essence name, Yaulynn, Y-A-U-L-Y-N-N (yah LINN).

SANDY: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome. I may also express to you clarification. What you offer to yourself in impressions in association with essence names are in actuality focus names. They are incorporated by these essences in physical manifestations but in association with individual focuses, not with the tone of the essence in association with all of its focuses in this physical dimension.

SANDY: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

EVAN: I would like to know about my essence information.

ELIAS: Very well. (Pause) Essence name, Bradley.

MIKE: Bredley or Bradley?

ELIAS: Latter. Essence family, Zuli; alignment in this focus, Gramada; orientation, common.

BEN: Ooooh!

ELIAS: (Dryly) Another cheering section. (Chuckles)

EVAN: My girlfriend, Tammy, who is not here today, how many past focuses have I known her?

ELIAS: Eleven.

EVAN: Is that a lot? (Laughter)

BEN: That’s enough. (Elias chuckles)

BRYCE: Hello. I’m curious also about essence information. I don’t really have any impressions.

ELIAS: Very well. (Pause) Essence name, Ximeu, X-I-M-E-U (ZEE moo). Essence family, Tumold; alignment, Ilda; orientation, common.

BEN: Does this essence name have a particular geographic association?

ELIAS: Far eastern. (Pause) Indonesia.

SANDY: So I feel as if I’ve shared lives with everybody in this room. Can I run past some impressions on what they might be?

ELIAS: Very well.

SANDY: Mikah and myself from Poland in World War Two? (Pause)

ELIAS: Correct time framework; investigate country.

SANDY: Thank you.

MIKE: Were we kamikaze pilots together?

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: Suki, from China, 1340-ish.

ELIAS: Correct.

BEN: What was the relationship?

ELIAS: Concubine. (Group laughter)

BEN: Which one was which?

SANDY: I shall be investigating!

ELIAS: (Looking at Sandy) YOU are the concubine. (Group laughter)

SANDY: I’m getting a feeling of the Maya with Bryce here, that’s 625 AD -ish.

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: With Frank, I’m feeling a butcher in London. Is it 1225?

FRANK: Another nefarious one?

ELIAS: (Leaning towards Frank and grinning) Not that type of butcher! (The group cracks up)

(To Sandy) Correct.

SANDY: Michael and myself, and I believe also Lynda, as York, England, 900-ish. (Pause)

ELIAS: Correct.

SANDY: Ben in France, 1400-ish.

ELIAS: Seventeen.

BEN: Were we in business together?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Was he one of my customers?

ELIAS: An acquaintance.

SANDY: I’m getting no feeling from (inaudible).

ELIAS: (Laughs loudly) You have exhausted your intuitional powers?

SANDY: I think not!

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! Continue!

SANDY: Is it America, 1920s, Chicago?

ELIAS: Correct.

MIKE: Was I with them?

ELIAS: Ah, Mikah! You desire to be...

MIKE: Now, come on! I have a focus there! It’s possible! (Pause)

ELIAS: There is an acquaintanceship, you are correct.

MIKE: Did I kill either one of them?

ELIAS: Much to your dismay, no. (Laughter)

SANDY: I do have one final thing. I was reading a book recently and I came across an excerpt from a fellow named Francesco Petrarch. I got a lot of blue dots on that. Is this a focus of mine around 1300, Italy?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: I have a question for Tracy. Tracy would like to know if the Iliad and the Odyssey were written by the same person or whether it was a combination of people, or were they really written by someone named Homer?

ELIAS: The question and the response are two-fold. The stories are a collective of ideas; the writing is of one individual.

BEN: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

SANDY: May I offer a time-period impression for when they were composed?

ELIAS: You may.

SANDY: Twelve-eighty BC.

ELIAS: No.

SANDY: Earlier? (Pause)

ELIAS: No.

BEN: Does Bryce have a focus as a choreographer? (Pause)

ELIAS: Yes!

EVAN: Does Bryce have a focus as a puppeteer? (Pause)

ELIAS: Yes. (Leaning towards Bryce) Do you have impressions?

BRYCE: Do I have what?

ELIAS: Impressions. (Chuckles) It matters not. You may allow other individuals to offer their impressions. Quite efficient, allowing other individuals to offer information to you through their impressions, and in this manner you need not concern yourself! (Chuckles)

SANDY: I’ve been playing in some, what I would call, projection states and I’m becoming increasingly lucid within these states. Am I being helped in the lucidity factor? I think that these happen to me a lot, but I think that I’m being aided to some extent in becoming more lucid in this.

ELIAS: By yourself.

SANDY: Ah. This is a self-generated lucidity action.

ELIAS: In association with the movement of this shift in consciousness, yes.

SANDY: Would the shift in consciousness be the energy I’m using to help me become more lucid within these altered states?

ELIAS: No. You are generating this shift in consciousness; therefore in the choice of that movement you are allowing yourself to be widening your awareness.

SANDY: I seem to be getting a lot of dreams of future-tense cities. Would this be related to The City?

ELIAS: Yes.

SANDY: It is!

BEN: Does Sandy have a focus as a lawyer?

ELIAS: Yes.

SANDY: What time period is that?

MIKE: Is that one of Oscar’s lawyers?

ELIAS: No.

BEN: One of Bosie’s lawyers?

ELIAS: No. (Laughs)

EVAN: So, the last focus I shared with Tammy, what was that?

ELIAS: And your impression?

EVAN: I don’t know. Maybe something from the World War Two era.

ELIAS: You do incorporate a focus within that time framework and within that mass event.

EVAN: I think maybe it has something to do with World War Two, not necessarily Europe.

ELIAS: Within your present country and society.

EVAN: In the United States?

ELIAS: Yes.

EVAN: And what was the relationship between us?

ELIAS: Similar; romantic.

EVAN: Would you say that the majority of the 12 that we share are romantic? (Pause)

ELIAS: In percentage, yes. In this, what I am expressing is you incorporate four in romantic relationship, but the other relationships are intimate relationships of different capacities.

EVAN: Are there any relationships where the capacities have changed?

ELIAS: Clarify.

EVAN: That started out romantic and moved on to (inaudible).

ELIAS: Within those four, no.

MIKE: Can I ask a question for Matt? What is his essence name and essence families?

ELIAS: Essence name, Blythe; essence family, Sumari; alignment, Milumet.

MIKE: Do I have a focus in the 1970s that is a biker?

ELIAS: As slightly overlapping, yes.

SANDY: Did that focus of his disengage in a high-speed motorcycle accident?

ELIAS: No; an altered probability.

SANDY: I’m asking because I had a friend, Mark, who was a biker who disengaged as such, (inaudible). No connection?

ELIAS: No.

BEN: Does Bryce have a focus in what we would consider an alien dimension?

ELIAS: As do you all.

BEN: Was I interactive with Bryce in an alien-dimension focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Is this a physical dimension?

ELIAS: Yes.

EVAN: Do they have alien sex? (Group laughter)

ELIAS: (Humorously) It is dependent upon your definition of sex. Do other-dimensional focuses procreate? Yes. Do they engage this action in similar manner to yourselves? Not necessarily! (Chuckles)

PAT: Do I have a focus as an artist in another time framework?

ELIAS: Yes.

PAT: In Europe, southern France, Avignon?

ELIAS: Yes.

PAT: Can I get a name?

ELIAS: And shall you investigate? (Chuckles) The point is to be practicing with your impressions and allowing yourselves to trust yourselves and your communications to yourselves and express an allowance and acceptance of yourselves.

We shall be disengaging this day. But I shall offer to you each a reminder to be paying attention to yourselves, especially within this time framework. There is a tremendous expression of energy which is in movement presently in association with this shift in consciousness. Therefore, in avoidance of conflict and trauma and confusion, pay attention to what you are generating.

FRANK: What does that mean exactly? Is everything going to blow up again?

ELIAS: No! Much to your dismay again! (Group laughter) I am aware that you are craving drama!

FRANK: There’s a lot of conflicts going on now, so.

ELIAS: Quite, and shall you engage physical interaction with trauma in choice?

FRANK: Maybe.

ELIAS: Very well! Experience away, Christian! (Laughs)

But for those of you that choose to be AVOIDING trauma or conflict, I express the suggestion that you allow yourselves to be paying attention to what you are generating and yourselves, and not concerning yourselves with the choices or the behaviors of other individuals. This is a significant action in this present time framework, and you may view yourselves to be easily distracted from this action of paying attention to yourselves.

In this, I shall offer to you each and to you all my affection as always, and my continued offering of energy (leaning close to Bryce), my friend.

FEMALE: (Inaudible)

ELIAS: Yes. (Group laughter) Genuine affection.

I anticipate our next meeting. I offer encouragements to you each, and you may watch for my energy, for I shall be interactive with you each. To you all, this afternoon, au revoir.

GROUP: Au revoir.

Elias departs at 4:58 PM.

Endnotes: