Home

Introduction

Digests

Transcripts

Exercises

Gems

Library

Search

Donate

  Session 878 (Private/Phone)  

“Money”

“Examining Physical Imagery”

“A ‘Crazy’ Neighbor”

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Carla (Jilliane).

Elias arrives at 11:33 AM. (Arrival time is 33 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good morning!

CARLA: Good morning.

ELIAS: (Chuckles) Welcome!

CARLA: This is Carla or ... could you pronounce my name?

ELIAS: Jilliane (zhil ee AHN).

CARLA: French, perhaps?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: You’ve spoken about being in contact with ones that are objectively drawn to the material prior to them getting into the material. When did you first contact me?

ELIAS: I have been subjectively interactive with you, in your terms of time framework, approximately eight months.

CARLA: I have a couple of questions from Dale or Jene. She says, “I’ve noticed I was perpetuating my financial situation by automatically choosing obstacles. I’ve also noticed much of my reasons for choosing to create in this manner, the foremost being to notice creative expression is not limited by lack of financial resources or by anything outside of self. In regards to this and my intention of being an intuitive facilitator, I’ve also noticed that the easiest and least intrusive and most accepting ‘method’ so to speak is by simply expressing my personal experiences in likeness and not holding expectations of what my clients may take or not take from it. Am I finally getting it, so that I may be creating much more effortlessly and pleasantly?”

She’s had a long-standing issue with this.

ELIAS: I am understanding, and you may convey to Jene an acknowledgment from myself that now she is allowing herself to create movement that shall be creating more of an effortlessness in relation to her creativity. In this, allowing herself to turn her attention to self and not be expressing the expectations in relation to other individuals and what they shall create is a significant step in turning her perception.

In this also, I may express that other than noticing and recognizing the projection of attention outside of self in expectation concerning other individuals, she also may be allowing herself to be recognizing the automatic expression and response of allowing other individuals’ choices to be dictating to her what her choices shall be. This is expressed quite strongly in the subject matter of finances.

CARLA: She doesn’t get what the shredded money imagery has to do with this, but she’s quite certain it’s related.

ELIAS: Which is imagery concerning actual lack of value of this manifestation.

In this, let me express to you that you may offer to her, she is also allowing the object to dictate to her what her choices shall be or shall not be. It is not even necessary for her to allow herself to be dictated to in choices by other individuals – she allows OBJECTS to dictate her reality to her. If this object is not within her possession, she shall deny her own choices in movement, for her belief is that the object is a requirement in relation to certain choices. What she may allow herself to view now is that she does not ACQUIRE this object of currency, she generates it.

None of you acquire this object of currency; it is not dependent upon the choice of other individuals. Other individuals do not GIVE you what you do not already possess, regardless of how it appears in objective physical imagery.

(Firmly) Once again I shall express: objective physical imagery is abstract, and in this, the beliefs that she holds in like manner to many other individuals create a perception, or influence her perception, in a manner in which she expresses to herself that she must be acquiring this object of currency from other individuals, and therefore other individuals create aspects of her reality by offering this currency to her and her receiving of it, and the object itself dictates her choices. In this, she becomes victim within self in relation to other individuals and to the object of the currency itself.

Rather, in turning her attention to self, examining her beliefs, examining automatic responses, expectations and how she allows other expressions to dictate her reality to her, she may also offer herself the recognition that in actuality she is not acquiring, she is generating.

CARLA: James would like to know if you liked his combination picture of you as your focuses of Beethoven and Wilde.

ELIAS: It matters not.

CARLA: Okay, that was the question I was given.

ELIAS: This is his expression of creativity, and what holds significance is whether HE is appreciating of it or not.

CARLA: Dale’s other question is, “In regards to my nail imagery, I feel I am presenting myself a reminder of not holding to my energy in fear of my expression; stepping out into myself and allowing a free circulation of ALL of me. Correct?” (Pause)

ELIAS: To an extent, yes.

CARLA: Is Dale thought focus or religious, political ... I don’t think she’s an emotional. (Elias chuckles; Carla laughs) Or am I wrong? She doesn’t think she’s an emotional.

ELIAS: Ah! (Laughs) And I may express to you, yes, she is incorporating emotional focus.

CARLA: But it’s not necessarily a Vold belonging ... Vold are not necessarily emotional, right?

ELIAS: No, not necessarily.

CARLA: That just happens to be the case.

I’d like to ask you a few basic questions about family, alignment, orientation, focus of my immediate family and their essence names. I’ll start with my husband. What is Rob’s essence name?

ELIAS: Essence name, Omar.

CARLA: O-M-A-R?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: And his family, what does he belong to?

ELIAS: And your impression?

CARLA: I did have one impression a while ago that keeps coming back and it was ... I don’t know if it’s belonging to or aligning with, but it’s Gramada.

ELIAS: Correct – belonging to Sumafi, aligning with Gramada.

CARLA: Is he a continuing focus or a final focus? I’d say he’s like me, I’d say he’s a continuing.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

CARLA: And he’s common, isn’t he?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: That’s what I thought. Okay, and my daughter, Robyn, her essence name? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Ritah, R-I-T-A-H (REE tah).

CARLA: I’m going to give you my impression as far as ... I don’t know if it’s belonging to or what, but I think there’s Sumari there.

ELIAS: Correct.

CARLA: Okay, belonging to or alignment?

ELIAS: Belonging to.

CARLA: Her alignment ... I have no idea. (Laughs)

ELIAS: Aligning with Zuli.

CARLA: Is she a continuing focus, Robyn?

ELIAS: I may express to you that you may access this information quite easily merely by inquiring of each individual, for each individual innately objectively knows.

CARLA: Everybody’s common in this family, aren’t they?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: Yes, that’s what I thought. And then you’re telling me to figure out whether they’re continuing or not?

ELIAS: You may inquire of each of them, for they shall know.

CARLA: Let’s go to Cal, what is his essence name? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Voyste, V-O-Y-S-T-E (VOIST).

CARLA: My impression of Calvin is that there’s Zuli there somewhere.

ELIAS: I may express to you this individual holds the reverse of...

CARLA: Ritah?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: Cool! Zuli/Sumari, okay! What is my sister Cari’s essence name? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Willa, W-I-L-L-A.

CARLA: And she’s common?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: Final focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: I told her about this session and asked her what note she thought she resonated with, and she thought A minor. She’s pretty musical.

ELIAS: Correct.

CARLA: She said that she thought I resonated with B, and I said C, middle C.

ELIAS: C sharp.

CARLA: C sharp?

ELIAS: Correct.

CARLA: And colors, she thinks that she’s a dark red or a brick color. I would call it maroon.

ELIAS: Correct.

CARLA: And for me, some kind of a green, a really light green.

ELIAS: You are correct, that which you may identify as sea foam.

CARLA: Sea foam green, okay! I’d like to know how many focuses I have in this dimension.

ELIAS: Eight hundred fifty-six.

CARLA: How many focuses in this time frame?

ELIAS: This present time framework, four.

CARLA: How many focuses does Cari have in this dimension?

ELIAS: Nine hundred seventeen.

CARLA: And in this time framework?

ELIAS: Six.

CARLA: I’ve been trying to ... a lot of people are able to know who their other focuses are. I think I’ve gotten four of them, and I would like to confirm them. The only focuses I tune into are women, and they’re tall women, distinctively tall. The first woman I tuned into where I was actually her – I knew I was me but I was her – she was a black woman and she had a duffle bag full of money. It was a dream, but I think she might be a focus.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

CARLA: I can’t get what time frame she’s in. She’s not one of the current ones?

ELIAS: No. Nineteenth century.

CARLA: Okay, here’s another one: a tall blond woman, I think in Las Vegas or Los Angeles ... I think it’s Las Vegas, though. She’s being put up or kept by some mobster dude. All I can remember is her being tall, with blond hair, and she’s wearing pink. I don’t know what her name is.

ELIAS: You are correct.

CARLA: Can I ask you, what is her name?

ELIAS: (Chuckles) You shall discover this information if you are so choosing to be investigating!

CARLA: Are you going to tell me that with the previous one, too, if I ask what her name was?

ELIAS: Ha ha ha! Yes.

CARLA: Dang! I just have a problem with the names!

Another one was a Russian woman with big black boots, and she’s trudging through the snow. That’s all I remember of her. Do I have a focus as a Russian woman?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: And you won’t tell me her name, either? (Laughs, and Elias laughs)

You say I have four focuses in this time frame. Is Eric Clapton’s former wife, Patti Boyd, a focus of mine?

ELIAS: No, although your impression is valid for you have participated partially with that focus as an observing essence.

CARLA: Okay, because she’s actually someone I’ve had a few dreams about. I’ve dreamt I was her. On that same note, Dale had an impression that she had a focus of being Eric Clapton’s son, the one who fell out of a window and died back in 1990 or ‘91. Is she correct on that one? (Pause)

ELIAS: No. There is an association of a similar action which has been created within another focus of Jene, but not as this individual.

CARLA: A long time ago I tried to get essence names off of a Ouija board, and the only one I got I actually had a dream about. I was trying to get my sister’s, and the name Greta came up and then I had a dream where my sister-in-law told me that no, your sister isn’t Greta, I’m Greta! Can you elaborate on that?

ELIAS: This is a focus name, in actuality.

CARLA: Oh, a focus name. A physical focus name?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: My sister-in-law Kristen’s physical focus name?

ELIAS: Both.

CARLA: What?

ELIAS: Both individuals. (1)

CARLA: Okay, but ... okay!

A couple of weeks ago I had an incident when I was at my sister’s. I bent to get something out of the refridge and something in my upper left rib cage snapped. I’ve been having ... well, not when I’m awake and up and moving, it seems okay. But oh man, when I’m lying down it hurts! I just want to know, what is that? I think my body’s trying to tell me something, and I’m not sure what it is.

ELIAS: And what is your impression?

CARLA: Well, you know ... (laughs) I think it has something to do with me avoiding things. That’s my impression; that’s how I perceive it.

ELIAS: Partially, you are correct. You have created this painfulness in this particular area in a quite specific manner, in which you image to yourself objectively that when you are not creating movement you are dissatisfied with yourself.

In this, in the direction that you have chosen presently, to be examining self and beliefs and allowing yourself to widen your awareness, you also create this objective imagery to be emphasizing to yourself the significance of your continued movement in this expression and not to be creating a static-ness within yourself by not paying attention to automatic responses.

CARLA: Oh! (Laughs) I can tell you, when I retype that ... I understand what you’re saying, and the fullness of it will come to me when I type it out. I knew it was significant, because it hurt! (Elias laughs) I mean, it’s like a slap in the face, only it was in my rib.

ELIAS: Ah, and allow yourself to examine how efficiently you have created this expression in alignment with your cliché of the “thorn in the side.”

CARLA: (Laughs) Okay!

I got into a car accident and the whole imagery of it was avoidance. I was scared, I was runnin’, and they got me anyway! I just laughed to myself as I was waiting for the cops to show up. This is obviously me saying, “You can’t AVOID anything!” (Laughs) It’s got to be something like that.

ELIAS: And presenting to yourself that it is futile to be attempting to avoid YOURSELF.

CARLA: Avoid myself ... can you elaborate on that?

ELIAS: You shall be with you regardless of where you run. Therefore, it is futile to attempt to be avoiding yourself and escaping yourself, for you shall be present regardless of where you move. This also presents you an opportunity to pay attention to self and to view the strength of your expression of fear.

CARLA: My expression of fear is quite strong.

ELIAS: Quite, and in this, as you offer yourself the opportunity to view your expression of fear, you also may examine this and allow yourself to dissipate this fear, recognizing that you in actuality create all of your reality. No other individual may express any hurtfulness to you that you do not create within yourself.

CARLA: I do know I do this.

ELIAS: Correct, and this offers you a tremendous opportunity in familiarizing yourself with you and these types of expressions. You may offer yourself new freedom to choose other expressions. You are not locked to the experiences that you have created previously as absolutes.

CARLA: Because I can start over ... I can just start creating new experiences.

ELIAS: Let me express to you, my friend, every moment is a new experience and creates a new outcome.

CARLA: I read in a transcript about somebody creating an energy deposit in their backyard. Well, I think I created an energy deposit in one of my plants, because I’m harvesting four-leaf clovers. You obviously know what the imagery of that is! (Laughs) I have shamrocks, but they’re three-leaf clovers. I’ve never honestly seen a four-leaf clover, and now I’m growing them! There’s got to be something going on with that!

ELIAS: Offering yourself a validation in relation to your movement in what you associate as...

CARLA: Good luck?

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: Of course ... you know, I offer myself black cats running across my path in the morning. (Elias laughs) I offer myself a bunch of bad luck imagery, and this is actually really kind of a novelty to me.

ELIAS: And I may express to you, my friend, this is merely your choice of imagery that offers you information which is suggestive of the alignment of your beliefs. You image to yourself physical imagery that is in alignment with superstition. This is not bad. It is merely a choice of a type of imagery that you create that offers you information concerning what you are creating.

CARLA: It’s just my way of telling me something obvious.

ELIAS: Correct. In a manner of speaking, you are offering to yourself your omen. (Chuckles)

CARLA: The four-leaf clovers, they were like telling me, “Okay, everything’s still all right.” (Laughs) Even though I had worms eat away at a couple! I’ve given myself imagery with these guys. I’m the only one I know that can present myself with the good-lucky thing and then have a worm eat away at a couple of them. (Elias chuckles) But they still keep coming up. You know, I haven’t cursed myself! (Elias laughs) I don’t know! (Laughing) No, actually that’s been a real source of amusement for me.

Anyway, let me go on to my next one here. Transition, I’ve got a great example of somebody in transition. Who is it that I live next door to – Alice in Wonderland? Alice, what is going on with that woman? I’ve lived next to her for nine years and I have never even called the cops! She sees things that I really wonder about, and then she’s just off! My next-door neighbor ... I don’t know. Can you give me some kind of explanation for this woman?

ELIAS: This is not a creation of transition.

CARLA: It isn’t?

ELIAS: No, this individual merely chooses to be incorporating different aspects of reality that do not quite fit within your officially accepted reality as expressed through mass associations and beliefs. This individual allows herself to be creating a reality within your physical dimension which is expressed slightly differently than what you generally are creating en masse within your officially accepted guidelines of what you term to be the norm.

There are many individuals that choose to be creating this type of expression. I may express to you that within this time framework there are many more individuals that incorporate this type of allowance within their reality than has been expressed at any other time framework within your history, for individuals allow themselves a wider field of freedom in experimentation of creating their reality in this physical dimension in association with this shift in consciousness. As I have expressed previously to other individuals, figuratively speaking, what you view now to be lunacy and normalcy may be quite reversed in their expressions as you objectify this shift in consciousness. Ha ha!

CARLA: Maybe that’s why we ... I don’t know, but do you call it an allowance? I don’t feel like I should call the police on her – she hasn’t set her house on fire – she’s just annoying, but I really feel that it isn’t right to ... I don’t know.

ELIAS: Let me also express to you, my friend, the reason that many of you express annoyance with individuals that are choosing to be creating their reality differently than the officially accepted reality is partially that you recognize that these individuals are in actuality allowing themselves to be genuinely creating many of the expressions that you wish to be creating.

CARLA: I don’t wish to be creating a lot of things that she’s creating! She doesn’t seem to be happy in her creations. Like somebody’s in her head, they’re hurting her ears – oh, and I was burning her face two days ago.

ELIAS: I am understanding that you wish not to be creating of similar type of imagery, but this individual does hold her attention quite clearly within the now and does express a tremendous focus of attention upon self.

CARLA: She does? It’s one of these things – I’ve lived next to her for ten years – I really feel like I’ve ignored it and maybe I should look at it a little bit more. I mean, it’s there for me to see, so...

ELIAS: Quite, and it matters not that you may choose different expressions of objective imagery. There are other expressions. There are concepts that are being expressed in a reality with this individual that are quite in alignment with this information.

CARLA: I understand that, to a certain extent I do. It was always a matter of I didn’t know what to do with her. I’ve had enough of this information to try to at least stop and understand.

ELIAS: There is nothing to be done with this individual. (Laughs)

CARLA: (Laughs) I know – okay, you’re right. Well, she hasn’t done anything, really. She’s just ... she’s loud, but that’s about it. I mean, she hasn’t set her house on fire. She’s been all right. You know what, she has been all right for ten years. She’s been crazy, but crazy with quotes around it. But she’s been all right.

ELIAS: And this you may examine also your assessment and your automatic judgment. If the individual had chosen to be alighting her structure with fire, this would be her choice, would it not?

CARLA: Yes, only that she would be alighting ours, too, since we’re so close.

ELIAS: Ah, and therefore the other individual creates your reality!

CARLA: (Laughs) Logically it would seem so!

ELIAS: Ah, and this may be an opportunity also for you to examine your beliefs.

CARLA: Actually, we’re traveling down a road I don’t want to go down, because it hasn’t happened yet and I don’t think it will, so ... it’s a weird fear, but I don’t need to keep going down that road. (Laughs)

One last thing before ... I think we’ve got like five minutes here. Intent, what’s my intent? I’ve been really stymied as far as Vold/Tumold. You blew me away when you told me I was Vold. I’m like, “I’m what?” I’m NOT revolutionary. I am emotional but I’m like really inner-emotional. You know, I’m not exuding emotion. Dale said, “Your Tumold tempers your Vold.” It must, but I’m not even really sure what you mean by that. I don’t know, I’ve been trying to figure this out since I knew this information. My intent is trying to do something differently by (laughs) ... I don’t know!

ELIAS: Let me express to you, my friend, the manner in which you allow yourself to discover your individual intent within any particular focus is to view the theme of your focus, from what you identify as childhood through all of your focus.

This, my friend, I am greatly encouraging of individuals to be examining and discovering within themselves. For this is a tremendously information-offering experience, for this allows you a genuine opportunity to become realistically familiar with you. This is what may be viewed as the exploration of self in objectively discovering what you naturally generate in movement and in action within your individual expression. In this, the theme of your focus remains consistent throughout the entirety of your focus.

If you are not recognizing what your theme is in what you naturally generate in movement and attention – what you hold your attention in direction of throughout your focus – how shall you allow yourself to become familiar with you genuinely?

Therefore, this is an important and significant exercise for all of you to engage, to allow yourselves to examine the entirety of your focus, not merely your experiences but your natural movement of direction regardless of what subject matter you to choose to be engaging, allowing yourself to discover the underlying theme which motivates you in whatever direction you choose.

CARLA: I’m getting that in increments.

ELIAS: Yes.

CARLA: I think we have to bid adieu here. My little recorder thing says our hour is up. Man, I could talk to you ... well, you know! (Elias laughs) My whole worry is that I could go on forever here, and I could but I will not. I will actually hold my energy in not as much next time we get together.

ELIAS: Very well!

CARLA: And I will be more relaxed.

ELIAS: Very well, my friend. I shall anticipate our next meeting and your offering of your discovery of your individual intent.

CARLA: I’ll figure it out, or I’ll try. Thank you, Elias.

ELIAS: In great affection, I express au revoir.

CARLA: Au revoir.

Elias departs at 12:34 PM.

Endnotes: