the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.










Friday, February 25, 2000

<  Session 571 (Private/Phone)  >

“Alterations of Essence Names”

“The Depth of Objective Reality”

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Tom (Malhaine).

Elias arrives at 1:06 PM. (Arrival time is 24 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good morning!

TOM: Good morning! (Elias chuckles) I’m sure you’re aware of the good time we were having here! (Laughing) I always want to ask how you are, but I know how you are – you’re as always!

ELIAS: Quite! (Chuckling)

TOM: So, I guess I just want to do an energy exchange. I do have a few things. We talked about chapter focuses in our last session, and I guess I wanted to clarify a little bit about chapter focuses. Now, is this a book involving multiple essences, or is this a book of one essence that others associate with, so to speak?

ELIAS: Involving many essences.

TOM: Okay, so it is a book with many essences.


TOM: Okay, so the book that we were talking about would involve many, many essences in that intent with the shift.


TOM: Okay. Speaking of those chapters, I guess I was going to ... well, let me give you the names, to see how close my impressions are. With the sorcerer, I got two. I guess that he doesn’t use his actual name. Alantas is what he uses, but it seems like his name is Alferd, or something on that order. (Pause)

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

TOM: Okay, and the Roman soldier is Diontrius?

ELIAS: Diontria.

TOM: Diontria?

ELIAS: Correct.

TOM: It seems like he’s into studying the religions of that time era, really into the mystical, so to speak.

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes, you are correct, and offers himself information through interaction with other individuals, but also holds the information to himself, for the most part.

TOM: Because of his position as a general?

ELIAS: Correct.

TOM: Okay. Speaking of which, in the Alexander focus, the focus of Roxanne, I was wondering about her essence name. Is it the same as Jolyn, the person Jolyn? (Pause)

ELIAS: Let me offer to you information which is pertinent to this time framework presently concerning essence names, which is applicable in this situation and in many, many, many other situations presently, and has been throughout the time framework of what you would term to be this previous year.

All of this which I shall be expressing to you is directly related to this shift in consciousness and the movement of energy, and also to the time framework which has been and is now occurring.

First of all, let me preface by offering the reminder in relation to your previous year and the information that I have offered to you all concerning that year, and the movement of energy and the tremendous offering of energy to that time framework which allowed for more of an ease in movement with respect to this shift in consciousness.

This present time framework of this year also incorporates a tremendous energy surge which allows for an ease in movement also, but in a different type of manner. For within this time framework and ongoing, you are now objectively inserting this shift in consciousness into your officially accepted objective reality.

You are not merely moving energy subjectively in conjunction with the shift. You are not merely familiarizing yourselves with yourselves and with your belief systems. You have moved beyond the concept of acceptance and are beginning to be manifesting the actual physical insertion of this shift in consciousness into your reality throughout your globe.

Now; this is significant in relation to essence also, for those essences which choose to be manifesting focuses within this particular dimension presently and within the time framework which I have expressed are also allowing for a tremendous acceleration in energy and an intensity of energy.

And in that expression, in mirror, so to speak, to the action of the shift itself, the essences are also allowing a tremendous expression of freedom in energy in what they choose to be manifesting and exploring in relation to this physical dimension.

Now; this holds significance in the subject matter of essence names and families, and has accelerated in energy quite consistently within what you would term to be a time framework of approximately ten months. In that time framework – which be remembering, is continuing now – the freedom of expression within the manifestations of those essences which participate in this physical dimension and in the action of this shift is affecting of the tone and the choices of manifestations, alignments, intents, and expressions of what is projected in attention into the focuses in this physical dimension.

Fragmentation, as I have stated previously, is continuously occurring within essence. This is a continuous action which essence participates within as an exploration of consciousness and as the action of becoming. But to this point within your physical history of this physical dimension, the action of fragmentation has been affecting of focuses, but not in what you may term to be the intensity of which it occurs now.

This is creating great confusion for many individuals presently, for you within physical focus inquire of information concerning your essence family and alignment within a particular focus, and you inquire as to an offering of what you identify to be your essence name. In this, you identify quite singularly with that information, and you also identify quite permanently and absolutely with that information.

I have expressed previously that what is offered within the identification of an essence name is the offering of a translation of the tone of the entirety of essence, but I have also expressed to you that this translation of tone is not the entirety of the tonal quality which is expressed as an identification of the individual essence. It is a translatable element of the tonal quality of essence.

In this, understand, within your objective awareness and recognition, that this tonal quality is not absolute and is not static. It is fluid and it is changing.

Therefore, although I may express an essence name to any individual, the expression of that essence name is the identification, within the moment, of that translatable element of the tonal quality which may be associated with the individual identity of the personality tone in that moment.

Now; that tone may be what appears as consistently projected in some focuses. It may appear quite inconsistent in other focuses. This is dependent upon the action of essence, and there are many factors, so to speak, which may be expressed in the influence of the translation of that translatable essence tone.

As an aside, I may express to you presently, within this time framework, the translatable essence tone that you hold is altered, and appears within your language differently than that which you are familiar with. You hold a familiarity with that essence naming of Malhai.

TOM: Correct.

ELIAS: Within this present now, the identification of that translatable tone is Malhaine. (mal-hi-een’)

TOM: Could you spell that?


Now; in this, you presently, within this time framework of this day, this moment, have not requested of myself the identification of essence name or tone, correct?

TOM: Pardon me? I have not requested this?

ELIAS: Correct.

TOM: Right; correct.

ELIAS: Therefore, were I not offering this information within this present now, your thought process and your identification of yourself would be that which you associate with the tone of Malhai.

TOM: Correct.

ELIAS: For you have not offered yourself the information, which may be expressed differently. This is not to say that the tone is not expressed differently. You have merely not inquired.

TOM: Correct.

ELIAS: But as you inquire, you hold an expectation that I shall offer to you what you identify and label within your definitions as a truthful response. Therefore, I offer to you an accurate response – for as we are aware, this is not a question of truth (grinning) – and in that accuracy of response, it is confusing to you, for it is unfamiliar and it is not being expressed as an absolute.

Once the name has been offered in alteration, you re-create the association with absoluteness once again, and you look to what you identify as the new essence name as the absolute and permanent expression. I express to you that within moments subsequent to that offering, you may move in energy and expression of essence tone to the reincorporation of Malhai.

TOM: So, there are no absolutes in essence. There’s much more to this than we objectively hold presently.

ELIAS: Correct. There is more of what you term to be volume to essence than what you have allowed yourselves to view previously. What you have allowed yourselves to view previously is what is familiar to you, and that is the expression of absolute, which is flat.

What I am offering to you now in information – in conjunction with the movement of this shift, as you ARE beginning your insertion in objective terms of it into your reality – is the recognition that you are also allowing yourselves the objective movement into the knowing of essence and the volume of essence, as who and what you are.

I shall be continuing subsequently, as I continue to be interactive with other individuals, the offering of information in this direction of subject matter for a time framework, in that you collectively may allow yourselves to become more familiar objectively in the knowing of what you have held previously subjectively.

You all look to the action of this shift in consciousness and express excitement within yourselves in anticipation of the wanting of its materialization; the presentment, in objective reality, of all that you perceive to be manifest subjectively.

I express to you, you have entered your new millennium. This is your marker. This is what you are accomplishing now. This is the action that you are engaging now, to be inserting that knowing and therefore that reality into your objective awareness, which you have previously shielded from yourselves objectively, but have held subjectively.

In this, the concept of no separation is beginning its movement out of the realm of concept and into the objectification within your reality. You do not hold other focuses. You ARE other focuses.

You are multidimensional. You express tremendous volume as essence. Essence is you, and is expressed fully within every focus of attention. You are not separated by time or manifestation from any other focus of attention of essence, any more than you are separated from you, within your perception, merely by the action of focusing your attention in different manners within your reality.

You may hold your attention, as I have stated many times previously, in many different areas simultaneously, objectively, within your mundane waking reality. Within a moment that you create no intentional objective physical movement, your attention is projected in many different expressions and directions, not merely one.

None of you are, in a manner of speaking, ever singularly focusing your attention in one area. You allow yourselves the identification or the illusion that you may be concentrating your attention, so to speak, objectively in one direction, but within any moment within your manifestation, your attention is occupied in many, many different expressions simultaneously.

You merely allow yourself the perception of one direction of that attention – one expression, for the most part, of that attention – which appears to be the most dominant to you or the most interesting to you within any particular time framework. But in actuality, your attention is diversely expressed in many directions.

This is, as I have stated many times, the mirror action, in physical expression, of nonphysical expression of essence. You – as you in this focus – are the physical presentment in manifestation of all of essence. Therefore, we now begin the piercing of a new veil of self, to be incorporating the realization, in objective terms, that you are an expression of energy personality consciousness.

This is an expression of continuous movement. It is not absolute. It is not stationary. It is not static. It is continuously becoming. It is continuously altering. It is continuously changing. How may you hold an absolute, permanent identification of one tone, and also be continuously changing, becoming, altering, exploring? THIS is the contradiction, not the expression of alteration of essence tone.

Now; I shall be subsequently, what you term to be futurely, offering information in relation to essence families also, and your identification of those essence families, and shall be offering you more information concerning the actions of mergence and fragmentation, which are also influencing of your focuses presently in more of an intensity, as I have stated, for many individuals are incorporating confusion concerning self and their identification.

But I shall also be reminding of you and of all other individuals to which I speak, I have expressed previously the cautioning that within the incorporation of this shift in consciousness, and your expansion of your awareness and your allowance of yourselves to be incorporating this freedom of movement within this shift in consciousness, you also incorporate the potential and the possibility to be threatening of your individual identities temporarily.

This is not unusual, for you are allowing yourselves to be recognizing, in objective reality and awareness, this lack of separation, but you have incorporated these veils of separation for much time framework throughout your history of this particular physical dimension. Therefore, the lack of separation is quite unfamiliar to you, and the incorporation of essence as who and what you are within the expression of a focus of attention is quite unfamiliar, for it is exceedingly vast and volumous.

TOM: Well, we’re used to separating self into parts objectively – mind, body, spirit – the duality – and our beliefs in that.

ELIAS: Quite.

As to your inquiry of essence name, I offer to you, no, it is not the same. But I also express to you, I have offered you this explanation and this information this day, that you may hold an objective understanding that this is the expression within this now, and that may be altered.

I may also incorporate one note within this subject matter, which may also be offered to the new essence of Aisha, which you may be offering this information to Michael.

TOM: Aisha?

ELIAS: Yes. This essence incorporates a new expression within a focus presently, has created the action of fragmentation and has incorporated a new tone, and chosen new family and new alignment. (Reference session #570, 2/22/00-2)

What has also previously been offered to the individual focus of that essence, which has been sparking, so to speak, of that particular action, is the identification of a momentary alteration in expression of orientation within that focus. That has been adjusted.

As I have stated previously, generally speaking, orientation is the choice of the individual focus, and although a fragmentation or any other action within essence occurs and may be altering of tone and even families, the orientation of the individual focus does not alter ... although I shall express for clarification, once again, this also is not an absolute.

But generally speaking, this action is not occurring. The individual focus generally is not altering of that orientation, regardless of the alteration of other elements within the focus, and within that particular focus of which I am speaking, the orientation is also not altered. It has been merely a momentary expression in a type of transition.

But this is also information that you may be allowing yourself to be incorporating within your familiarization with self. Generally speaking, regardless of the alteration of tone of essence, which may be affecting of your focus, your orientation is the choice of this particular attention, this particular focus, for a particular experience, in conjunction with the choice of manifestation.

TOM: Okay. Aisha is I-E-S-H-A?

ELIAS: The spelling has already been offered.

TOM: Okay, so I can just pass that information to Michael.

ELIAS: Yes. You may express also to Michael and Lawrence that their essence tones alter at times also. Generally speaking, they are resuming the tone which has been offered in the translation of those particular essence names, but within particular time frameworks or moments, those translations are in actuality different also.

TOM: Okay. I will pass that along.

ELIAS: Therefore, be remembering: Although a new essence name may be offered, such as that which I have offered to you this day of Malhaine, the expression of the focus of attention chooses to allow that incorporation of alteration within the focus, and may choose that to be a temporary alteration.

This is not an action which merely occurs to you, in a manner of speaking. Subjectively, you hold full awareness of this action and choose to be incorporating of this alteration. You also choose whether you shall continue in that alteration or you shall not continue in that alteration.

TOM: Or you may continue altering constantly, so to speak?

ELIAS: Yes, you may, and this is not necessarily an action of fragmentation.

TOM: It’s an action of energy.

ELIAS: It is an incorporation of energy, which may be expressed in tonal quality, incorporating the recognition of mergences of essences, which may be affecting of the particular focus of attention within certain moments.

There are other actions which occur also within essence, of which we have spoken little previously. At times, more than one essence may be choosing to be focusing one attention within a particular manifestation.

TOM: This is why sometimes the tonal quality will change, and people will comment that you’re a different person?

ELIAS: At times. Or, an individual may be within a particular time framework inquiring as to essence families, and within the moment, I may express the response that the individual holds more than two essence families within that focus.

TOM: Okay, that’s interesting. There’s a lot more to this than we are objectively aware of.

ELIAS: You are correct. It is, as I have stated, dependent upon the expression of the attention of the focus within a particular time framework. It is not entirely what you presently identify as the attention of essence all together, in a manner of speaking.

Let me express briefly a comparison in simplicity.

You may present yourself with an object, and through your perception, which creates your reality, you may view that particular object within one moment to be blue. You may alter your perception. You may view the very same object, and within the subsequent moment, you may express that you view that object to be violet.

You are viewing the same object. You are creating that object through your perception in the same form. Your attention is focused in the same direction, but you have altered your perception in that attention slightly. Therefore, what you create within one moment is blue, and what you create within another moment is violet. In this, you remain the same. The object remains the same, other than its color. Your attention remains the same, in a manner of speaking.

In like manner, within different moments, dependent upon the movement of the focus and the attention of the focus – as it is affecting of essence, just as your perception, which creates your reality, is affecting of you, but they may not be separated – as the attention of the focus is affecting of essence, the tonal quality within that moment may be altered, or the alignment of family may be altered.

Or, dependent upon the expression of the focus and the manifestation of the focus, the family which the focus is belonging to may be affected, for the attention may be directed to the expression of one essence within one moment and to another essence within another moment, and if the focus is a projection, a manifestation of combined essences, it may be turning its attention within different moments and it may be expressing different essence families.

We shall be incorporating more information concerning this subject matter futurely.

But briefly, I offer this to you, that you may hold an understanding that you have merely incorporated the initial identifications of these concepts of essence names, essence tones, essence families, essence colors, focus colors, other focuses of essences, chapter focuses of essence, or essence as consciousness.

You have incorporated the beginnings of your objective understanding, which presents you with the viewing of the flatness, so to speak, in like manner to the picture which is painted as the representation of reality, that which you define as two-dimensional, in your very physical terminology.

The painting incorporates the flatness, for it is merely the initial representation. The creation of your actual reality is what you term to be three- or four-dimensional, which incorporates more depth, and as you have moved into this millennium, now you incorporate more of the depth in objective reality, not merely subjective reality. Are you understanding?

TOM: I think I am. We’re just touching, in an analogy, the tip of the iceberg with our concepts presently, and now we’re moving the iceberg above the water? (Laughing)

ELIAS: Ha ha ha!

TOM: Slowly! (Elias chuckles) I can see the vastness of even my perception, and how we place even essence as an outside god.

ELIAS: Quite, and I shall express to you, you are moving much more rapidly than you allow yourself the realization of in actuality, and in this, you are quite right in your identification, that you view yourselves as essence to be merely another form of a god to the focus.

But I express to you that you are also, within this now, redefining your terms, as I have stated previously, and therefore, you are also redefining your reality, and in this, you are allowing yourselves to be inserting this shift in consciousness into your objective reality. All that you have viewed previously as imagination is becoming not so very imaginary! (Chuckling)

TOM: We’re releasing the limitations.

ELIAS: Quite.

TOM: I was going to enter something for the game, but I’m not sure there’s a category. But under the category of acceptance, I want to enter smooth energy flow, so to speak, and non-acceptance as a holding energy?

ELIAS: And with which shall place this entry in relation to?

TOM: Belief systems?

ELIAS: No. Which essence family shall you identify with....

TOM: Oh, which essence family? I would identify with the essence family of Tumold. (Pause)

ELIAS: And what shall you identify with your second entry?

TOM: With the second entry? (Laughing) I would identify that entry with Sumafi.

ELIAS: Therefore, you identify the acceptance with Tumold and the lack of acceptance with Sumafi.

TOM: (Laughing) Yes.


TOM: (Laughing) And that, I guess, is the objective....

ELIAS: And I shall express to you, to both entries, in conjunction with your belief systems, acceptable. HA HA HA! And I shall offer to you the challenge to be understanding what you have just presented and what I have accepted! Ha ha ha ha!

TOM: Okay, in energy I’m beginning to pick it up. I don’t have an objective knowing. (Laughing)

ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha!

TOM: But it’s within belief systems.

ELIAS: Hee hee hee ha ha!

TOM: That is probably the key to that entry. (Laughing)

I guess there were a few other little things I was gonna talk to you about. You’ve covered the things that I have jotted down. You know my energy before we begin.

ELIAS: I am quite familiar with you. (Chuckling) Ah, but you are quite familiar with myself also!

TOM: Yes, I am. (Elias chuckles) These spirals ... I guess I’ve been sending energy in spirals occasionally. I don’t know what to say about it ... we’ll maybe pass over that.

I have one question about energy centers, and the belief that you must use certain energy centers for leaving the body, so to speak. This is just merely a belief or part of belief systems, and not an absolute also, correct?

ELIAS: Quite correct.

TOM: Okay, that was my experience.

I guess the other thing was a couple of essence names or tones ... presently! (Laughing) One is for Eden. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Waix; W-A-I-X. (wakes)

TOM: Okay, and then a new focus also called Thomas John. (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Zonya; Z-O-N-Y-A. (zon’ya)

TOM: What would be the family and alignment for Thomas John? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence family, Sumafi; alignment, Milumet.

TOM: Hmm. Interesting.

Opan has talked about a Native American focus, and he asked about the possibility of myself holding a focus as the medicine man or sorcerer in that time – Antonzia or something like that? Is this correct? (Pause)

ELIAS: You do not hold this position, but you do incorporate a focus in this culture, and within this tribe, so to speak, you hold a relationship of brother to an individual which exercises that role.

TOM: Okay. I’m more of a warrior type in that focus?

ELIAS: Not necessarily what you may identify as warrior, for these individuals are not engaging within their time framework the expression of aggression, for the most part, but occupying the accepted male role within that culture.

TOM: Okay, so not a lot of battling, and more hunting! (Laughing)

ELIAS: Ha ha! Quite disappointing in the adventuresome direction!

TOM: Yes! (Laughing) I think we’ve talked about most everything. I guess I’ve been connecting with Ruther. Do you have any input on our connection?

ELIAS: I shall leave you to your investigation!

Be remembering, you are inserting this shift in consciousness into your objective awareness NOW. Therefore, you shall allow yourself more and more ease in which you incorporate the realization of your abilities. (Chuckling)

TOM: Okay. (Laughing)

ELIAS: Therefore, my friend, you may stand challenged! (Chuckling)

TOM: Send a challenge?

ELIAS: I have challenged you!

TOM: Oh, okay! You’re challenging me! Now I get it! (Laughing)

Okay, I think we’ve covered everything. I have more essence names and families, but we can do that in our next objective meeting.

ELIAS: Very well. I offer to you much affection this day, and I continue in my offering of energy in encouragement with you. You may also extend my greetings, once again, to Sena.

TOM: Okay.

ELIAS: To you this day, my friend, continue in playfulness, and so shall I! (Chuckling)

TOM: Okay, that sounds great!

ELIAS: To you this day, au revoir.

TOM: Au revoir to you.

Elias departs at 2:17 PM.

< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >

© 2000 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.